Genetic elements driving circular rna translation and methods of use

ABSTRACT

Provided herein are recombinant circular RNA (circRNA) molecules comprising an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) operably linked to a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence. The IRES includes at least one RNA secondary structure element; and a sequence region that is complementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Methods of producing a protein in a cell using the recombinant circRNA molecules are also provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No.17/937,617, filed Oct. 3, 2022, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,685,924, issuedJun. 27, 2023, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.17/696,606, filed Mar. 16, 2022, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,560,567, issuedJan. 24, 2023, which is a continuation of International Application No.PCT/US2021/039127, filed Jun. 25, 2021, which claims priority to U.S.Provisional Application No. 63/186,507, filed May 10, 2021, and U.S.Provisional Application No. 63/043,964, filed Jun. 25, 2020, thecontents of which are herein incorporated by reference in theirentireties.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY-SPONSORED RESEARCH

This invention was made with Government support under contract CA209919awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certainrights in the invention.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The computer readable sequence listing filed herewith, titled“STDU2-38293-404 SQL”, created Sep. 29, 2022, having a file size of34,190,405 bytes, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD

The present invention relates to recombinant circular RNA (circRNA)molecules comprising internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) that containan RNA secondary structure element and a nucleic acid sequence regioncomplementary to 18S rRNA, as well as methods of use thereof.

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, results from deep sequencing and computationalanalysis have suggested that circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a large classof RNAs in mammalian cells that play important roles in variousbiological processes. Disruption of circRNA expression has been found tobe associated with human diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease,diabetes, and cancers. Furthermore, the exceptional stability andcell-specific expression patterns of circRNAs have led to the use ofcircRNAs as biomarkers for diseases such as cancers, and as indicatorsof the efficacy of certain treatments. While most of the studiesdemonstrate that circRNAs function as non-coding RNAs, such as spongesfor miRNAs, regulators of mRNA splicing machinery, sequestration ofRNA-binding proteins (RBPs), regulators of RBP interaction, andactivators of immune responses, emerging evidence suggests that somecircRNAs encode peptides and/or proteins and thereby function throughthese encoded polypeptides. Proteins known to be translated fromcircRNAs regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, andmyogenesis. Dysregulation of circRNA-encoded proteins has beenassociated with tumorigenesis in certain cancers. Accordingly,circRNA-encoded proteins may be an important link between the class ofbiologically relevant circRNA and cancer, and perhaps other diseases.Understanding the mechanism of circRNA translation, therefore, may aidin the development of therapeutic methods and/or modalities whichexploit circRNA biology and their encoded proteins.

Because circRNA is generated by spliceosome-mediated head-to-tailjoining of pre-mRNAs, it does not contain the 5′cap that is commonlyknown to be required for cap-dependent translation. Thus, circRNAtranslation utilizes alternate mechanisms to initiate cap-independenttranslation, such as the use of an internal ribosome entry site (IRES)sequence that is recognized by ribosomes. Introduction of an IRES onsynthetically generated circRNAs is sufficient to initiate translationof encoded circRNA proteins, thereby suggesting that endogenous circRNAsharboring IRES sequence may have translation potential as they areexported to the cytoplasm.

Given the rapidly advancing yet nascent state of the art, there remainsa need for the identification and characterization of the geneticelements, beyond the presence of an IRES, that can facilitate, initiate,direct or regulate circRNA translation. In particular, there is a needto identify novel IRES sequences that can operably facilitate expressionof proteins encoded by circRNAs.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The disclosure provides polynucleotides (e.g., DNA sequences) thatencode one or more circular RNA (circRNA) molecules; wherein thecircular RNA molecule comprises a payload sequence region (e.g., proteincoding or non-coding sequence region) and an internal ribosome entrysite (IRES) sequence region operably linked to the payload sequenceregion. In some embodiments, the IRES comprises: at least one sequenceregion having an RNA secondary structure element; and a sequence regionthat is complementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). In someembodiments, the IRES has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9kJ/mol and a melting temperature of at least 35.0° C. Some embodimentsof the disclosure include those wherein the RNA secondary structuresequence region or element is formed from the nucleotides at aboutposition 40 to about position 60 of the IRES, wherein the firstnucleotide at the 5′ end of the IRES is considered to be position 1.

The disclosure also provides polynucleotides (e.g., a DNA sequence)encoding a circular RNA molecule; wherein the circular RNA moleculecomprises a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence and an internalribosome entry site (IRES), wherein the IRES is encoded by any one ofthe nucleic acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201,or a nucleic acid sequence having at least 90% or at least 95% identityor homology thereto over at least 50% of the length of the nucleic acidsequence.

The disclosure also provides recombinant circular RNA moleculescomprising a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region and an internalribosome entry site (IRES) sequence region operably linked to theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence region, wherein the IRES comprises:at least one sequence region having secondary structure element; and asequence region that is complementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA);wherein the IRES has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9kJ/mol and a melting temperature of at least 35.0° C. In someembodiments, the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region is operablylinked to the IRES in a non-native configuration.

The disclosure also provides recombinant circular RNA moleculescomprising a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region and an internalribosome entry site (IRES) sequence region operably linked to theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence; wherein the IRES is encoded by anyone of the nucleic acid sequences listed in of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQID NO: 229-17201, or a nucleic acid sequence having at least 90% or atleast 95% homology or identity thereto. In some embodiments, theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence region is operably linked to theIRES in a non-native configuration.

Also provided are methods of producing a protein in a cell using theaforementioned recombinant circular RNA molecules, or polynucleotides(e.g., DNA molecules) encoding the same.

Also provided are as vectors comprising the aforementioned recombinantcircular RNA molecules, or DNA molecules encoding the same.

Also provided are host cells comprising the aforementioned recombinantcircular RNA molecules, or DNA molecules encoding the same.

Also provided are compositions comprising (i) a DNA sequence encoding acircular RNA, and (ii) a non-coding circular RNA or a DNA sequenceencoding the same.

Also provided are methods for delivering a non-coding circular RNA to acell, the methods comprising contacting the cell with a compositioncomprising a DNA sequence encoding a circular RNA, and (ii) a non-codingcircular RNA or a DNA sequence encoding the same, thereby delivering thenon-coding circular RNA to the cell.

The disclosure further provides an oligonucleotide comprising a nucleicacid sequence region that hybridizes to an internal ribosome entry site(IRES) sequence region present on a circular RNA molecule and uponhybridization inhibits translation of the coding sequence region of thecircular RNA molecule. Also provided is a method of inhibitingtranslation of a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region (e.g.,payload) of a circular RNA molecule using the aforementionedoligonucleotide.

These and other embodiments will be explained in further detail below,and in the appended drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed incolor. Copies of this patent or patent application publication withcolor drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and paymentof the necessary fee.

FIG. 1A-1D show high-throughput identification of RNA sequences that canfacilitate cap-independent translation activity on circRNA. FIG. 1Aprovides a schematic overview of the high-throughput split-eGFP circRNAreporter screening assay for identifying circRNA IRES. A synthetic oligolibrary containing 55,000 oligos was cloned into a split-eGFP circRNAreporter. Since the full-length eGFP will only be reconstituted whenback-spliced into the circRNA, the eGFP fluorescence signal can onlycome from the cap-independent translation activity driven by theinserted oligos on the circRNA. The eGFP(+) cells were sorted into sevenexpression bins by their eGFP fluorescence intensity with FACS. Thenumber of reads for each synthetic oligo within each bin was determinedby next-generation DNA sequencing. The final eGFP expression for eachsynthetic oligo was quantified by the mean weighted bin number accordingto the distribution of the number of reads across seven expression binsfrom two independent biological replicates. Shown in FIG. 1B is the eGFPexpression distribution of 40,855 captured synthetic oligos. eGFP(+)oligos were defined as the oligos with eGFP expression higher than thebackground eGFP threshold (the eGFP expression of no-oligo-inserted eGFPcircRNA reporter). The pie chart represents the composition of differentoligo categories among eGFP(+) oligos. Shown in FIG. 1C isquantification of the percentage of captured eGFP(+) oligos among theoligos originated from the sequences of the reported IRES, viral 5′ UTR,or human 5′ UTR in the screening assay. Shown in FIG. 1D isidentification of circular and linear RNA specific IRESs. NormalizedeGFP expression (log 10) is shown for each captured oligo in thescreening assay performed on the circular RNA (described herein) or thelinear RNA (Weingarten-Gabbay et al., 2016)) screening system utilizingthe same synthetic oligo library. Circular IRESs (green circles) orlinear IRESs (blue circles) were identified by comparing the IRESactivity of the oligos that were detected only in either circular orlinear RNA screening system, respectively. Red dashed lines representthe normalized eGFP expression threshold.

FIG. 2A-2E show that circRNAs containing an eGFP(+) oligo have highercap-independent translation activity. FIG. 2A shows a schematic overviewof the circRNA polysome profiling method for capturing translatedcircRNAs. FIG. 2B shows (poly)ribosome fractionations of cellstransfected with split-eGFP circRNA reporter containing the syntheticoligo library followed by cycloheximide (CHX) treatment. Fractions 7 to12 (shaded in blue) were determined as (poly)ribosome fractionsaccording to the Abs254 pattern. Shown in FIG. 2C is quantification ofthe percentage of (poly)ribosome-enriched oligos among the capturedeGFP(−) oligos with eGFP expression below the 20th percentile or theeGFP(+) oligos with eGFP expression above the 80th percentile,respectively. FIG. 2D provides sequencing reads from Ribo-seq andQTI-seq plotted on the genes showing eGFP(+) oligos harboring aTIS(top), nTIS (middle), and dTIS (bottom) with overlapped annotatedcircRNAs (brown segments). FIG. 2E shows quantification of thepercentage of eGFP(−) or eGFP(+) oligos harboring no TIS (TIS(−)) (left)or more than one TIS (TIS(+)) (right), and the percentage of aTIS, nTIS,or dTIS oligos among eGFP(+)/TIS(+) oligos.

FIG. 3A-3J shows that the 18S rRNA complementary sequence on the IRESfacilitates circRNA cap-independent translation activity. Provided inFIG. 3A is a schematic of the sliding-window design of synthetic oligosfor mapping the active regions on the human 18S rRNA. FIG. 3B showsquantification of the mean eGFP expression of the synthetic oligosoverlapped with the corresponding position across the human 18S rRNA.The dashed line indicates the background eGFP expression. The identifiedactive regions on the 18S rRNA are shaded in green. FIG. 3C provides anillustration of the secondary structure of human 18S rRNA showing theidentified active regions and reported RNA contact regions on the 18SrRNA. The identified active regions 1 to 6 are shaded in green. Boxesoutlined the regions on the 18S rRNA that have been reported to contactwith mRNA (red) or IRES RNA (orange). FIG. 3D shows quantification ofthe number of the 18S rRNA active 7-mers or the random 7-mers harboredby eGFP(+) or eGFP(−) oligos plotted on a Tukey box-plot (outliers notshown). Ns: not significant; ****: p-value<0.001 by an unpairedtwo-sample t-test. Shown in FIG. 3E is quantification of the IRESactivity for the oligo with higher or lower 18S rRNA complementaritydetermined by FACS (MFIeGFP/mRuby). *: p-value<0.05 relative to thewild-type (WT) oligo by an unpaired two-sample t-test (n=4-6 independentreplicates). Error bar: SEM. FIG. 3F provides a schematic of the designof synthetic oligos for systematic scanning mutagenesis. FIG. 3G showsthe eGFP expression of each oligo containing the random substitutionmutation at the corresponding position on the HCV IRES. The black dotrepresents the start position of each mutation on the IRES. Theidentified essential elements are shaded in blue. The red linesrepresented the functional domains on the HCV IRES that have beenreported. The eGFP expression for each oligo was normalized to the meaneGFP expression of all the oligos on the HCV IRES. In FIG. 311 ,examples are provided of circRNA IRES with local and global sensitivityidentified by scanning mutagenesis. The identified essential elements onthe IRES are shaded in blue. In FIG. 3I, the mean eGFP expression of allthe circRNA IRES oligos with global sensitivity is shown at eachmutation position across the IRES. The regions harboring regulatoryelements were shaded in different 10 colors (blue: 5-15 nt and 135-165nt; red: 40-60 nt). Shown in FIG. 3J is quantification of the local MFEin a 15 nucleotide (nt) sliding window on the IRES. The regionsharboring regulatory elements were shaded in different colors (blue:5-15 nt and 135-165 nt; red: 40-60 nt).

FIG. 4A-4K shows that a distinct SuRE at 40-60 nucleotide (nt) positionon the IRES can facilitate circular IRES activity. FIG. 4A-4H show thesecondary structure of the mutated IRESs (SEQ ID NOs: 33925-33932)determined by M2-seq. The arrowheads indicate the high-confidencesecondary structure identified by M2-net; the corresponding positionsare labeled with the same color on the RNA structure panel. Redarrowheads indicate the SuRE at the 40-60 nt position on the circularIRES. CircIRES-dis: circular IRES with the SuRE disrupted by sequencesubstitution. CircIRES-relocate: Circular IRES with the SuRE relocatedto 90-110 nt region. CircIRES-single and circIRES-comp: circular IRESwith single complementary mutations and compensatory doublecomplementary mutations, respectively. circIRES-BoxB: circular IRES withthe SuRE substituted by BoxB stem-loop. linearIRES-add: linear IRES with40-60 nt region substituted by the SuRE at the 40-60 nt position on thecircular IRES. Shown in FIG. 4I is quantification of the IRES activityfor each mutated IRES determined by FACS (MFIeGFP/mRuby). The activityof each permuted IRES was normalized to the linear IRES. Ns: notsignificant; **: p-value<0.01, ****: p-value<0.001 relative to thelinear IRES by an unpaired two-sample t-test (n=4-6 independentreplicates). Error bar: SEM. Shown in FIG. 4J is quantification of thepercentage of the eGFP(+) oligos (left) and endogenous translatedcircRNAs (right) harboring 18S rRNA complementarity or the SuRE element.FIG. 4K provides an illustration of two key regulatory elements,complementary 18S rRNA sequence and the SuRE at 40-60 nt position on theIRES, facilitating circRNA cap-independent translation.

FIG. 5A-5E show that IRES elements facilitate translation initiation ofendogenous circRNAs. FIG. 5A shows a schematic of disrupting the keyregulatory elements on the IRES of the oligo-split-eGFP-circRNA reporterby co-transfecting the anti-sense LNAs targeting specific regions on theIRES. LNA-18S: the LNA targeting the 18S rRNA complementary sequence onthe IRES; LNA-SuRE: the LNA targeting the SuRE at the 40-60 nt positionon the IRES; LNA-Rnd: the LNA targeting the random position downstreamof LNA-18S or LNA-SuRE on the IRES. Shown in FIG. 5B is quantificationof the normalized eGFP fluorescence signal intensity of the cellsco-transfected with the corresponding LNA and theoligo-split-eGFP-circRNA reporter carrying the corresponding IRES. Thenumber represents the index number of the oligo. Ns: not significant; *:p-value<0.05; **: p-value<0.01, ***: p-value<0.005 relative to the mocktransfection by an unpaired two-sample t-test (n=3-5 independentreplicates). Error bar: SEM. Provided in FIG. 5C is a schematic ofQTI-qRT-PCR quantification of the level of translation-initiatingendogenous circRNAs. FIG. 5D shows quantification of thetranslation-initiating RNA level of the human endogenous circRNAscontaining the corresponding IRES upon disrupting the IRES by thecorresponding LNA transfection. The circRNA level was normalized to theGAPDH mRNA. Ns: not significant; *: p-value<0.05; **: p-value<0.01, ***:p-value<0.005 relative to the mock transfection by an unpairedtwo-sample t-test (n=4-6 independent replicates). Error bar: SEM. Shownin FIG. 5E are images of western blots showing the level of proteinproduced from the endogenous circRNAs upon IRES disruption by thetransfection of the corresponding LNA.

FIG. 6A-6L demonstrate the identification of putative endogenouscircRNA-encoded proteins. FIG. 6A shows quantification of the percentageof IRES-mapped human endogenous circRNAs harboring one or more eGFP(+)oligo sequences (IRES(+) circRNA), or no eGFP(+) oligo sequences(IRES(−) circRNA). FIG. 6B shows quantification of the distribution ofthe parent genes among IRES(+) circRNAs. Each part of the pie chartrepresents a different gene. FIG. 6C shows quantification of thepercentage of potential cancer-associated IRES(+) circRNAs from theCSCD. Provided in FIG. 6D is a histogram showing the distribution of thenumber of IRES harbored by each individual IRES(+) circRNA (capped atn=20). FIG. 6E is a histogram showing the distribution of the number ofmapped circRNA for each individual eGFP(+) oligo (capped at n=20). FIG.6F shows the top 12 represented biological processes from GO termanalysis that are enriched in the parent genes of IRES(+) circRNAs.Provided in FIG. 6G is a schematic of generating the putative endogenouscircORF list. FIG. 6H shows the top 15 represented conserved motifs fromPfam analysis that are enriched in the predicted circRNA-encodedpolypeptides. FIG. 6I shows a schematic of peptidomic validation of theputative circORFs. Provided in FIG. 6J is a heat map showing the numberof unique tryptic polypeptides detected in the peptidomic dataset ofeach MS captured circORF. Shown in FIG. 6K are the MS1 and MS2 spectraof a representative tryptic BSJ polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 33933) capturedfrom circORF 575. FIG. 6L shows the representative MS2 spectra and thetop 3 rank PRM-MS transition ions spectra of the spike-in heavy isotopelabeled polypeptide (top right (SEQ ID NO: 33934)) and the sampletryptic polypeptide (bottom right (SEQ ID NO: 33934)) from circORF 19.[V]: heavy isotope labeled valine (13C5, 15N; +6 Da).

FIG. 7A-7L show that circRNA-encoded circFGFR1p suppresses cellproliferation under stress conditions. FIG. 7A provides is a schematicof the CDS of FGFR1 and circFGFR1 transcript. Shown in FIG. 7B is aschematic of the design of junctional RT-PCR primers (black arrows) andthe Sanger sequencing results detecting the back-splicing junction(yellow box) of circFGFR1 (SEQ ID NO: 33935). FIG. 7C provides is aschematic of the conserved motifs on FGFR1 and circFGFR1p. Ab (both):the antibody which can detect both FGFR1 and circFGFR1p. Ab-circFGFR1p:custom circFGFR1p antibody. The blue lines indicate the location of theantigen peptide for each antibody. FIG. 7D shows a schematic of thepolypeptides captured by IP-LC-MS.MS (underline) that matched thecircFGFR1p unique region (red) and the region overlapped with FGFR1(black) using a custom antibody against the unique region of thecircFGFR1p (in bold) (circFGFR1p (SEQ ID NO: 33902); circFGFR1p fragment(SEQ ID NO: 33936)). The extracted region (˜30-45 kDa) on the coomassieblue stained SDS-PAGE gel is outlined in red box. Shown in FIG. 7E arethe representative MS2 spectra and the top 3 rank PRM-MS transition ionsspectra of the spike-in heavy isotope labeled polypeptide (top (SEQ IDNO: 33937)) and the BJ tryptic polypeptide (bottom (SEQ ID NO: 33937))of circFGFR1p. [L]: heavy isotope labeled leucine (13C6, 15N; +7 Da).FIG. 7F provides are images of FGFR1(red), circFGFR1p (green) and DAPI(blue) in HEK-293T cells co-transfected with plasmids expressingHA-FGFR1 and FLAG-circFGFR1p without permeabilization. Scale bars: 10micrometers. Shown in FIG. 7G are western blots showing circFGFR1p andFGFR1 protein level (Ab-both), and the quantification of FGFR1 andcircFGFR1 RNA level by qRT-PCR of cells transfected with siRNA or LNA.siCtrl: non-targeting siRNAs; siCircFGFR1: circFGFR1 specific siRNAs;circFGFR1-LNA: anti-sense LNA oligo targeting the 18S rRNA complementarysequence on the circFGFR1 IRES. P-FGFR1: phosphorylated FGFR1. Ns: notsignificant; **p-value<0.01 relative to the siCtrl by an unpairedtwo-sample t-test (n=3 independent replicates). Error bar: SEM. (FIG.711 ) Shown is quantification of cell proliferation in cells with theknockdown of circFGFR1 RNA (siCircFGFR1) or circFGFR1p (circFGFR1-LNA)from day 1 to 4 with FGF1 addition. *p-value<0.05; **p-value<0.01;***p-value<0.005 relative to the siCtrl by an unpaired two-sample t-test(n=3-5 independent replicates). Error bar: SEM. Provided in FIG. 7I areimages of a western blot showing the cells with FGFR1, circFGFR1p, orFGFR1+circFGFR1p overexpression (left panel) and their correspondingcell proliferation from day 1 to 4 with FGF1 addition (right panel). Ns:not significant; *p-value<0.05, **p-value<0.01, ****p-value<0.001relative to the mock transfection by an unpaired two-sample t-test(n=4-6 independent replicates). Error bar: SEM. FIG. 7J provides imagesof western blots showing FGFR1 protein and circFGFR1p level with orwithout the heat-shock. FIG. 7K shows quantification of the Western blotof circFGFR1p protein level relative to FGFR1 (all isoforms) undernormal (WT) and the heat-shock (HS) condition. Error bar: SEM from threeindependent blots. *p-value<0.05 relative to the WT by an unpairedtwo-sample t-test (n=3 independent blots). Shown in FIG. 7L isquantification of the Western blot showing the change of the proteinlevel of FGFR1 and circFGFR1p under the heat-shock condition. Proteinlevel is normalized to the GAPDH protein loading control of eachcondition. Error bar: SEM from three independent blots. Ns: notsignificant; *p-value<0.05 relative to 1 by a one-sample t-test (n=3independent blots).

FIG. 8A-8C show that the oligo-split-eGFP-circRNA reporter constructdoes not generate eGFP signal from trans-splicing. FIG. 8A shows imagesof northern blots of IRES-split-eGFP circRNA reporter transfected andmRuby(+)/eGFP(+) sorted cells using probes against the mRuby, 3′eGFP,and the eGFP back-splicing junction region on the reporter transcriptwith or without RNase R treatment. Shown in FIG. 8B is quantification ofthe RNA level of the eGFP circRNA or the mRuby linear transcript in theIRES-split-eGFP circRNA reporter transfected and mRuby(+)/eGFP(+) sortedcell total RNA with RNase R treatment relative to the RNaseR (−)samples. The level of RNA was normalized to the GAPDH mRNA level in eachsample. Error bar: SEM. Ns: not significant; ****: p-value<0.001relative to the RNase R(−) sample by an unpaired two-sample t-test (n=3independent replicates). Error bar: SEM. FIG. 8C illustrates flowcytometry analysis of eGFP(+) cells upon transfected with correspondingreporter constructs. eGFP(+) cells were gated according to the cellswith mock transfection.

FIG. 9A-9F show high-throughput identification of IRES sequences thatcan facilitate cap-independent translation activity on circRNAs. FIG. 9Aprovides a reproducibility measurement of the eGFP expression for eachcaptured oligo of two independent biological replicates from thescreening assay. Only the oligos recovered in both replicates wereincluded in the analysis. The R represents the Pearson's correlationcoefficient. Provided in FIG. 9B is a schematic of the primers design toquantify the expression level of linear and circular transcripts of thereporter construct. The divergent circular primers spanning theback-splicing junction of circRNA should detect circular transcriptsonly. FIG. 9C shows quantification of circularization efficiency byqRT-PCR of seven randomly picked clones transfected oligo-split-eGFPreporter plasmid. The circularization efficiency was calculated bynormalizing the expression level of the circular transcripts to theexpression level of the linear transcripts. The number indicates theindex of the oligo. No-IRES: no-IRES-inserted reporter plasmid. Ns: notsignificant relative to the empty circRNA by an unpaired two-samplet-test (n=3 independent replicates). Error bar: SEM. FIG. 9D illustratesthe distribution of the fraction of reads across all 7 bins of cellstransfected with IRES-split-eGFP circRNA reporter carrying no-IRES(background eGFP expression), or the oligo showing high (oligo #25674),moderate (oligo #26338) or no (oligo #26961) cap-independent translationactivity. The black line represents the polynomial trend line of thedistribution. FIG. 9E provides images of western blots showing theexpression level of eGFP, Cre, and CD4 from the split-eGFP circRNAreporter containing no-IRES or the corresponding IRES. The numberindicates the index of the oligo. Provided in FIG. 9F are images of awestern blot showing eGFP expression level of the cap-dependenttranslated linear RNA (CMV promoter driven) and the cap-independenttranslated circRNA (IRES driven; oligo #8788).

FIG. 10A-10C show the high-throughput IRES screening assay can captureIRES from viral and human 5′ UTRs. These figures show examples of IRESscaptured in the screening assay with top 10 eGFP expression among thereported IRESs (i.e., linear IRESs) (FIG. 10A), viral 5′ UTRs (FIG.10B), and human 5′ UTRs (FIG. 10C).

FIG. 11A-11D show the IRES composition among the captured linear andcircular IRES. FIG. 11A provides a Venn diagram representing the numberof circular and linear specific IRES by comparing the results from thestudy (circular RNA system) with the results from the study described inWeingarten-Gabbay et al., Science 351, aad4939 (2016) (linear RNAsystem). Shown in FIG. 11B-11C is the composition of the captured viraland human IRES in the circular IRES (FIG. 11B), the linear IRES (FIG.11C), and the IRES showing cap-independent translation activity in boththe linear and circular RNA system (Both) (FIG. 11D).

FIG. 12A-12E show that the circRNAs containing the eGFP(+) oligosequence are more actively translated. FIG. 12A shows 40S and(poly)ribosome fractions of cells transfected with split-eGFP reportercontaining the synthetic oligo library and treated with puromycin (PMY;left panel) or cycloheximide (CHX; right panel) followed by sucrosegradient fractionation. FIG. 12B shows quantification of the ratio ofthe eGFP circRNA level relative to the mRuby linear transcript level ofthe IRES-split-eGFP circRNA reporter transfected and mRuby(+)/eGFP(+)sorted cell total RNA with RNase R treatment in a time-course manner (20U RNase R per 20 μg of RNA). Error bar: SEM. Shown in FIG. 12C isquantification of the fraction of the number of total reads of thecaptured oligos in 40S and (poly)ribosome fraction with PMY or CHXtreatment. FIG. 12D provides the number of captured eGFP(−) and eGFP(+)oligos before and after the RNase R treatment. FIG. 12E shows thenormalized number of reads of total captured oligos with RNase Rtreatment and captured oligos in the poly(ribosome) fraction.

FIG. 13A-13D show that eGFP(+) oligos are more frequently overlappedwith the translation initiation sites (TIS) on the human genome. Shownin FIG. 13A is quantification of the number of TIS reads in eGFP(+) oreGFP(−) oligos on the human genome. * * * * represents p-value<0.001 byan unpaired two-sample t-test. Error bar: SEM. Shown in FIG. 13B are themapped positions of TIS on each TIS(+) oligo plotted on the oligo. TheTIS positions were sorted by the mapped position on the oligo. FIG. 13Cshows the percentage of the number of active 7-mers on each position onthe oligo among all eGFP(+) oligos. FIG. 13D shows the cumulativefrequency distribution of number of the RRACH motif on the eGFP(+) andeGFP(−) oligos. Ns: not significant by Kolmogorov-Smirnov cumulativedistribution test.

FIG. 14A-14G show a feature comparison between linear and circular IRESsequences. Shown in FIG. 14A is quantification of the GC-content (left)and MFE (right) of circular IRESs and linear IRESs, plotted as Tukeybox-plot (outliers not shown). * * * * represents p-value<0.001 by anunpaired two-sample t-test. FIG. 14B shows cumulative frequencydistribution of number of canonical translation start codon (ATG) on thecircular and linear IRESs. Ns: not significant by Kolmogorov-Smirnovcumulative distribution test. Shown in FIG. 14C is cumulative frequencydistribution of number of m6A motif (RRACH, SEQ ID NO: 3394) on thecircular and linear IRESs. Ns: not significant by Kolmogorov-Smirnovcumulative distribution test. Shown in FIG. 14D is quantification ofnumber of Kozak sequence (ACCATGG, SEQ ID NO: 33945) on the circular andlinear IRESs. Ns: not significant by an unpaired two sample t-test.Error bar: SEM. FIG. 14E shows quantification of the IRES activity ofthe oligo in the circular RNA reporter (left) and linear RNA reporter(right), respectively. The IRES activity was determined with FACS bynormalizing the eGFP medium fluorescence intensity driven by the oligo(MFIeGFP) to the linear RNA expression level of the reporter constructdetermined by the mRuby medium fluorescence intensity (MFImRuby). Thevalue was further normalized to the oligo-6472. Ns: not significant, *:p-value<0.05, ***: p-value<0.005, ****: p-value<0.001 relative tooligo-6742 by an unpaired two-sample t-test (n=4-6 independentreplicates). Error bar: SEM. FIG. 14F-14G show the secondary structureof example circular IRESs (SEQ ID NOs: 33938-33940) and linear IRESs(SEQ ID NOs: 33941-33943) (three IRESs for each) determined by M2-seq.The arrowheads indicate the high confident secondary structureidentified by M2-net; the corresponding positions are labeled with thesame color on the RNA structure panel. Red arrowheads indicate the SuREat the 40-60 nt position on the circular IRESs.

FIG. 15A-15B show that IRES elements facilitate translation initiationof endogenous circRNAs. FIG. 15A shows quantification of the eGFPcircRNA level relative to the mRuby linear transcript level of the cellsco-transfected with the corresponding LNA and theoligo-split-eGFP-circRNA reporter carrying the corresponding IRES. Ns:not significant; *: p-value<0.05 relative to the mock transfection by anunpaired two-sample t-test (n=4-6 independent replicates). Error bar:SEM. Shown in FIG. 15B is quantification of the human endogenous circRNAlevel harboring the corresponding IRES upon disrupting the IRES by thecorresponding LNA transfection. The circRNA level was normalized to theGAPDH mRNA. Ns: not significant relative to the mock transfection by anunpaired two-sample t-test (n=4-6 independent replicates). Error bar:SEM.

FIG. 16A-16L show identification of putative endogenous circRNA-encodedpolypeptides. FIG. 16A shows quantification of the percentage of allendogenous human circRNAs harboring no oligo sequences, no eGFP(+) oligosequences, or one or more eGFP(+) oligo sequences. Provided in FIG. 16Bis a histogram showing the distribution of the number of IRESs harboredby each individual IRES(+) circRNA (capped at n=20) among the circRNAsgenerated from the 159 transcripts for which oligos were designed tilingacross the entire transcripts. Provided in FIG. 16C is a histogramshowing the distribution of the number of mapped circRNAs for eachindividual eGFP(+) oligo (capped at n=20) among the circRNAs generatedfrom the 159 transcripts for which oligos were designed tiling acrossthe entire transcripts. Shown in FIG. 16D is the distribution of thedistance from the back-splicing junction to the mapped IRES on eachcircRNA (capped at nt=2000). The distance is calculated from theback-splicing junction to the first mapped nucleotide of the IRES. GCmatched oligo: the RNA sequence on the circRNA with the same length andGC-content as the mapped IRES. The distance of GC matched oligo wasdetermined on each IRES-mapped circRNA by taking the average distancefrom the back-splicing junction to all the GC matched oligos on thecircRNA. FIG. 16E illustrates quantification of the percentage ofcircRNA-encoded polypeptide with the ORF overlapping the IRES region onthe circRNA. Shown in FIG. 16F is quantification of the percentage ofcircRNA-encoded polypeptide with infinite recursive ORF on circRNA amongIRES-overlapping ORFs. FIG. 16G shows an image of a Western blot showinginfinite recursive eGFP translation of cells transfected with thesplit-eGFP circRNA reporter containing an in-frame IRES (oligo-2007).FIG. 16H provides a histogram showing the size distribution of predictedcircRNA-encoded polypeptides. Shown in FIG. 16I is quantification of thepercentage of circORFs with matched sORFs using the mapped IRES ORFanalysis method or traditional ORF analysis method. Shown in FIG. 16J isquantification of the percentage of the circRNAs identified bypeptidomics that contain at least one RFP fragment uniquely overlappingwith the back-splicing junction. Shown in FIG. 16K is the percentage ofthe coverage of MS-20 identified polypeptides on each protein withdifferent expression level in human iPSCs. The MS profiling data wasobtained and mapped as described in Chen et al. (2020). FIG. 16L showsis the MS-identified polypeptide coverage on a lowly expressed EGFRprotein in human iPSCs. The red boxes represent the mapped position ofthe MS-identified polypeptides on the protein.

FIG. 17A-17I show that circRNA-encoded circFGFR1p suppresses cell growthunder stress conditions. FIG. 17A shows the H3K4me3 level obtained fromENCODE on the genomic region of FGFR1 and circFGFR1 showing noenrichment of the promoter signature near circFGFR1 IRES. FIG. 17Bprovides are images of FGFR1(red), circFGFR1p (green) and DAPI (blue) inHEK-293T cells co-transfected with plasmids expressing FGFR1 andFLAG-circFGFR1p with permeabilization. Scale bars: 10 micrometers. Shownin FIG. 17C is quantification of the expression level of circFGFR1 intumor samples and normal adjacent samples plotted as Tukey box-plot(outliers not shown). The data was extracted from the TCGA analysiswithout filtering (Nair et al., Oncotarget 7, 80967, (2016)). ERBC:estrogen receptor positive breast cancer; TNBC: triple-negative breastcancer. Shown in FIG. 17D is quantification of the expression level ofcircFGFR1 in non-transformed cell lines and cancer cell lines plotted asTukey box-plot. The data was extracted from the CSCD database (Xia etal., 2018). FIG. 17E shows quantification of circFGFR1 IRES activitywith or without heat-shock. Ns: not significant relative to the normalcondition (WT) by an unpaired two-sample t-test (n=3 independentreplicates). Error bar: SEM. Shown in FIG. 17F is quantification of therelative circularization efficiency of circFGFR1 RNA under normal or theheat-shock (HS) condition with qRT-PCR by normalizing the circFGFR1 RNAlevel to the linear FGFR1 RNA level using linear and circular RNAspecific primers respectively. Ns: not significant relative to thenormal condition by an unpaired two-sample t-test (n=3 independentreplicates). Shown in FIG. 17G is quantification of the circFGFR1 RNAlevel by qRT-PCR with or without heat-shock (normalized to GAPDH mRNAlevel). Ns: not significant relative to the normal condition by anunpaired two-sample t-test (n=3 independent replicates). Provided inFIG. 1711 is a schematic showing that, under normal conditions, upon FGFaddition, FGFR1 undergoes dimerization and autophosphorylation,activating the downstream cell signaling pathway and facilitating cellproliferation. FIG. 17I provides is a schematic showing that, understress conditions, the translation of FGFR1 RNA is downregulated,resulting in low FGFR1 protein level, where the cap-independenttranslation activity of circFGFR1 IRES remains steady. Upon FGFaddition, circFGFR1p dimerizes with FGFR1. However, since circFGFR1placks the autophosphorylation domain, the circFGFR1p-FGFR1 dimer cannotactivate the downstream cell signaling pathway, resulting in thesuppression of cell proliferation.

FIG. 18A-18B shows mean free energies (MFE) of various IRES identifiedand/or tested in the screen described herein. FIG. 18A shows MFEs forall viral IRES positive oligos in DNA format and all human IRES positiveoligos in DNA format. Provided in FIG. 18B is a histogram showing eGFPexpression levels driven by representative viral IRESs from DNA-basedIRES screen.

FIGS. 19A and 19B provide schematics of fixed positions of secondarystructure elements as part of an IRES, wherein the secondary structureelement spans from approximately nucleotide positions 40-60 bp from +1start site of IRES sequence. The 18S complementary sequences may bepositioned either 5′ (FIG. 19A) or 3′ (FIG. 19B) to the secondarystructure element. In these figures, the secondary structure element isa hairpin; however the secondary structure element may have one or morealternative structures as described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure is predicated, at least in part, on thedevelopment of a high-throughput reporter assay that can systematicallyscreen and quantify the IRES activity of RNA sequences that canfacilitate circRNA translation. This assay can identify elements in theprimary and secondary structure of a circRNA IRES that are important forfacilitating circRNA translation. This assay also enables theidentification of potential endogenous protein-coding circRNAs, furtherexpanding the currently-understood proteome. For example, the disclosuredemonstrates the identification of a circRNA-encoded protein,circFGFR1p, that functions as a negative regulator of FGFR1 through adominant negative mechanism to suppress cell growth under stressconditions. The embodiments described herein provide a resource torecognize and manipulate circRNA translation and reveal a new scope ofthe endogenous circRNA proteome, which provides insights intocircRNA-associated diseases and the development of new therapeuticmethods targeting circRNA-encoded proteins.

The disclosure is further based on the discovery that circFGFR1p is anendogenous circRNA-encoded protein that is a negative regulator of FGFR1signaling and suppresses cell growth under stress conditions. Whilecells decrease global translation under stress conditions, many IRES candrive higher cap-independent translation activity under stressconditions, including the IRES of circZNF-609. Embodiments describedherein highlight an important regulatory mechanism for how cells utilizedifferent translation machinery to respond to stress conditions, andillustrate how circRNAs may be used to maintain protein translationunder such conditions. While cells predominantly utilize cap-dependentlinear mRNA translation to produce proteins, they can shift the RNAsource of translation toward circRNA by upregulating the cap-independenttranslation activity of circRNA IRES under stress conditions. Thedepletion of circFGFR1 in human cancers may occur to down-regulatecircFGFR1p and increase the proliferative signaling through FGFsignaling. circRNA-encoded proteins may be useful for expressingindividual subunits or “modules” of multi-domain proteins, allowingcells the ability to independently control translation thereof. Thedisclosure provides a new model of how circRNA translation is regulatedby a mechanism which differs from linear mRNA translation and how cellsutilize circRNA-encoded proteins to respond to a dynamic environment.The disclosure also provides recombinant circular RNAs comprising aprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence and an IRES operably linked to theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence, which can be used to express oneor more proteins of interest in a cell.

Definitions

To facilitate an understanding of the present technology, a number ofterms and phrases are defined below. Additional definitions are setforth throughout the detailed description.

The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and “at least one” andsimilar referents in the context of describing the invention (especiallyin the context of the following claims) are to be construed to coverboth the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein orclearly contradicted by context. The use of the term “at least one”followed by a list of one or more items (for example, “at least one of Aand B”) is to be construed to mean one item selected from the listeditems (A or B) or any combination of two or more of the listed items (Aand B), unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted bycontext. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended toserve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separatevalue falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, andeach separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it wereindividually recited herein. All methods described herein can beperformed in any order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwiseclearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, orexemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merelyto better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on thescope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in thespecification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed elementas essential to the practice of the invention.

The terms “nucleic acid sequence,” “polynucleotide,” and“oligonucleotide” are used interchangeably herein and refer to a polymeror oligomer of pyrimidine and/or purine bases, such as cytosine,thymine, and uracil, and adenine and guanine, respectively (See AlbertL. Lehninger, Principles of Biochemistry, at 793-800 (Worth Pub. 1982)).The terms encompass any deoxyribonucleotide, ribonucleotide, or peptidenucleic acid component, and any chemical variants thereof, such asmethylated, hydroxymethylated, or glycosylated forms of these bases. Thepolymers or oligomers may be heterogenous or homogenous in composition,may be isolated from naturally occurring sources, or may be artificiallyor synthetically produced. In addition, the nucleic acids may be DNA orRNA, or a mixture thereof, and may exist permanently or transitionallyin single-stranded or double-stranded form, including homoduplex,heteroduplex, and hybrid states. A nucleic acid or nucleic acid sequencemay comprise other kinds of nucleic acid structures such as, forinstance, a DNA/RNA helix, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), morpholinonucleic acid (see, e.g., Braasch and Corey, Biochemistry, 41(14):4503-4510 (2002) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506), locked nucleic acid (LNA;see Wahlestedt et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 97: 5633-5638(2000)), cyclohexenyl nucleic acids (see Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122:8595-8602 (2000)), and/or a ribozyme. The terms “nucleic acid” and“nucleic acid sequence” may also encompass a chain comprisingnon-natural nucleotides, modified nucleotides, and/or non-nucleotidebuilding blocks that can exhibit the same function as naturalnucleotides (e.g., “nucleotide analogs”). The term “DNA sequence” isused herein to refer to a nucleic acid comprising a series of DNA bases.

The terms “polypeptide,” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein,and refer to a polymeric form of amino acids comprising at least two ormore contiguous amino acids chemically or biochemically modified orderivatized amino acids, and polypeptides having modified peptidebackbones. The term “peptide” as used herein refers to a class of shortpolypeptides. The term peptide may refer to a polymer of amino acids(natural or non-naturally occurring) having a length of up to about 100amino acids. For example, peptides may have a length of about 1 to about10, about 10 to about 25, about 25 to about 50, about 50 to about 75,about 75 to about 100 amino acids. In some embodiments, the peptides are5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 or 50 amino acids in length.

Nomenclature for nucleotides, nucleic acids, nucleosides, and aminoacids used herein is consistent with International Union of Pure andApplied Chemistry (IUPAC) standards (see, e.g.,bioinformatics.org/sms/iupac.html).

When referring to a nucleic acid sequence or protein sequence, the term“identity” is used to denote similarity between two sequences. Sequencesimilarity or identity may be determined using standard techniques knownin the art, including, but not limited to, the local sequence identityalgorithm of Smith & Waterman, Adv. Appl. Math. 2, 482 (1981), by thesequence identity alignment algorithm of Needleman & Wunsch, J Mol.Biol. 48,443 (1970), by the search for similarity method of Pearson &Lipman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2444 (1988), by computerizedimplementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA inthe Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group, 575Science Drive, Madison, WI), the Best Fit sequence program described byDevereux et al., Nucl. Acid Res. 12, 387-395 (1984), or by inspection.Another algorithm is the BLAST algorithm, described in Altschul et al.,J Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410, (1990) and Karlin et al., Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 90, 5873-5787 (1993). A particularly useful BLAST program isthe WU-BLAST-2 program which was obtained from Altschul et al., Methodsin Enzymology, 266, 460-480 (1996); blast.wustl/edu/blast/README.html.WU-BLAST-2 uses several search parameters, which are optionally set tothe default values. The parameters are dynamic values and areestablished by the program itself depending upon the composition of theparticular sequence and composition of the particular database againstwhich the sequence of interest is being searched; however, the valuesmay be adjusted to increase sensitivity. Further, an additional usefulalgorithm is gapped BLAST as reported by Altschul et al, (1997) NucleicAcids Res. 25, 3389-3402. Unless otherwise indicated, percent identityis determined herein using the algorithm available at the internetaddress: blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.govBlast.cgi.

The terms “internal ribosome entry site,” “internal ribosome entrysequence,” “IRES” and “IRES sequence region” are used interchangeablyherein and refer to cis elements of viral or human cellular RNAs (e.g.,messenger RNA (mRNA) and/or circRNAs) that bypass the steps of canonicaleukaryotic cap-dependent translation initiation. The canonicalcap-dependent mechanism used by the vast majority of eukaryotic mRNAsrequires an m⁷G cap at the 5′ end of the mRNA, initiator Met-tRNAmet,more than a dozen initiation factor proteins, directional scanning, andGTP hydrolysis to place a translationally competent ribosome at thestart codon. IRESs typically are comprised of a long and highlystructured 5′-UTR which mediates the translation initiation complexbinding and catalyzes the formation of a functional ribosome.

The terms “coding sequence,” “coding sequence region,” “coding region,”and “CDS” when referring to nucleic acid sequences may be usedinterchangeably herein to refer to the portion of a DNA or RNA sequence,for example, that is or may be translated to protein. The terms “readingframe,” “open reading frame,” and “ORF,” may be used interchangeablyherein to refer to a nucleotide sequence that begins with an initiationcodon (e.g., ATG) and, in some embodiments, ends with a terminationcodon (e.g., TAA, TAG, or TGA). Open reading frames may contain intronsand exons, and as such, all CDSs are ORFs, but not all ORF are CDSs.

The terms “complementary” and “complementarity” refers to therelationship between two nucleic acid sequences or nucleic acid monomershaving the capacity to form hydrogen bond(s) with one another by eithertraditional Watson-Crick base-paring or other non-traditional types ofpairing. The degree of complementarity between two nucleic acidsequences can be indicated by the percentage of nucleotides in a nucleicacid sequence which can form hydrogen bonds (e.g., Watson-Crick basepairing) with a second nucleic acid sequence (e.g., about 50%, about60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, and 100% complementary). Twonucleic acid sequences are “perfectly complementary” if all thecontiguous nucleotides of a nucleic acid sequence will hydrogen bondwith the same number of contiguous nucleotides in a second nucleic acidsequence. Two nucleic acid sequences are “substantially complementary”if the degree of complementarity between the two nucleic acid sequencesis at least 60% (e.g., at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, atleast 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 97%, atleast 98%, at least 99%, or 100%) over a region of at least 8nucleotides (e.g., at least 9, at least 10, at least 11, at least 12, atleast 13, at least 14, at least 15, at least 16, at least 17, at least18, at least 19, at least 20, at least 21, at least 22, at least 23, atleast 24, at least 25, at least 30, at least 35, at least 40, at least45, at least 50, or more nucleotides), or if the two nucleic acidsequences hybridize under at least moderate, or, in some embodimentshigh, stringency conditions. Exemplary moderate stringency conditionsinclude overnight incubation at 37° C. in a solution comprising 20%formamide, 5×SSC (150 mM NaCl, 15 mM trisodium citrate), 50 mM sodiumphosphate (pH 7.6), 5×Denhardt's solution, 10% dextran sulfate, and 20mg/ml denatured sheared salmon sperm DNA, followed by washing thefilters in 1×SSC at about 37-50° C., or substantially similarconditions, e.g., the moderately stringent conditions described inSambrook, J., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press; 4th edition (Jun. 15, 2012). High stringencyconditions are conditions that use, for example (1) low ionic strengthand high temperature for washing, such as 0.015 M sodium chloride/0.0015M sodium citrate/0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 50° C., (2) employa denaturing agent during hybridization, such as formamide, for example,50% (v/v) formamide with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/0.1%Ficoll/0.1% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/50 mM sodium phosphate buffer atpH 6.5 with 750 mM sodium chloride and 75 mM sodium citrate at 42° C.,or (3) employ 50% formamide, 5×SSC (0.75 M NaCl, 0.075 M sodiumcitrate), 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8), 0.1% sodium pyrophosphate,5×Denhardt's solution, sonicated salmon sperm DNA (50 μg/ml), 0.1% SDS,and 10% dextran sulfate at 42° C., with washes at (i) 42° C. in 0.2×SSC,(ii) 55° C. in 50% formamide, and (iii) 55° C. in 0.1×SSC (optionally incombination with EDTA). Additional details and an explanation ofstringency of hybridization reactions are provided in, e.g., Sambrook,supra; and Ausubel et al., eds., Short Protocols in Molecular Biology,5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J. (2002). The term“hybridization” or “hybridized” when referring to nucleic acid sequencesis the association formed between and/or among sequences havingcomplementarity.

The term “secondary structure,” or “secondary structure element” or“secondary structure sequence region” as used herein in reference tonucleic acid sequences (e.g., RNA, DNA, etc), refers to any non-linearconformation of nucleotide or ribonucleotide units. Such non-linearconformations may include base-pairing interactions within a singlenucleic acid polymer or between two polymers. Single-stranded RNAtypically forms complex and intricate base-pairing interactions due toits increased ability to form hydrogen bonds stemming from the extrahydroxyl group in the ribose sugar. Examples of secondary structures orsecondary structure elements include but are not limited to, forexample, stem-loops, hairpin structures, bulges, internal loops,multiloops, coils, random coils, helices, partial helices andpseudoknots. In some embodiments, the term “secondary structure” mayrefer to a SuRE element. The term “SuRE” stands for stem-loop structuredRNA element (SuRE).

The term “free energy,” as used herein, refers to the energy released byfolding an unfolded polynucleotide (e.g., RNA or DNA, etc.) molecule,or, conversely, the amount of energy that must be added in order tounfold a folded polynucleotide (e.g., RNA or DNA, etc.) The “minimumfree energy (MFE)” of a polynucleotide (e.g., DNA, RNA, etc.) describesthe lowest value of free energy observed for the polynucleotide whenassessed for various secondary structures thereof. The MFE of an RNAmolecule may be used to predict RNA or DNA secondary structure and isaffected by the number, composition, and arrangement of the RNA or RNAnucleotides. The more negative free energy a structure has, the morelikely is its formation since more stored energy is released byformation of the structure.

The term “melting temperature (Tm)” refers to the temperature at whichabout 50% of double-stranded nucleic acid structures (e.g., DNA/DNA,DNA/RNA, or RNA/RNA duplexes) denature and dissociate to single-strandedstructures.

The term “recombinant,” as used herein, means that a particular nucleicacid (DNA or RNA) is the product of various combinations of cloning,restriction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or ligation stepsresulting in a construct having a structural coding or non-codingsequence distinguishable from endogenous nucleic acids found in naturalsystems. DNA sequences encoding polypeptides can be assembled from cDNAfragments or from a series of synthetic oligonucleotides to provide asynthetic nucleic acid which is capable of being expressed from arecombinant transcriptional unit contained in a cell or in a cell-freetranscription and translation system. Genomic DNA comprising therelevant sequences can also be used in the formation of a recombinantgene or transcriptional unit. Sequences of non-translated DNA may bepresent 5′ or 3′ from the open reading frame, where such sequences donot interfere with manipulation or expression of the coding regions andmay act to modulate production of a desired product by variousmechanisms. Alternatively, DNA sequences encoding RNA that is nottranslated may also be considered recombinant. Thus, the term“recombinant” nucleic acid also refers to a nucleic acid which is notnaturally occurring, e.g., is made by the artificial combination of twootherwise separated segments of sequence through human intervention.This artificial combination is often accomplished by either chemicalsynthesis means, or by the artificial manipulation of isolated segmentsof nucleic acids, e.g., by genetic engineering techniques. Such isusually done to replace a codon with a codon encoding the same aminoacid, a conservative amino acid, or a non-conservative amino acid.Alternatively, the artificial combination may be performed to jointogether nucleic acid segments of desired functions to generate adesired combination of functions. This artificial combination is oftenaccomplished by either chemical synthesis means, or by the artificialmanipulation of isolated segments of nucleic acids, e.g., by geneticengineering techniques. When a recombinant polynucleotide encodes apolypeptide, the sequence of the encoded polypeptide can be naturallyoccurring (“wild type”) or can be a variant (e.g., a mutant) of thenaturally occurring sequence. Thus, the term “recombinant” polypeptidedoes not necessarily refer to a polypeptide whose sequence does notnaturally occur. Instead, a “recombinant” polypeptide is encoded by arecombinant DNA sequence, but the sequence of the polypeptide can benaturally occurring (“wild type”) or non-naturally occurring (e.g., avariant, a mutant, etc.). Thus, a “recombinant” polypeptide is theresult of human intervention, but may comprise a naturally occurringamino acid sequence.

The terms “operably linked” and “operatively linked,” as used herein,refer to an arrangement of elements that are configured so as toperform, function or be structured in such a manner as to be suitablefor an intended purpose. For example, a given promoter operably linkedto a coding sequence is capable of effecting the expression of thecoding sequence when the proper enzymes are present. Expression is meantto include the transcription of any one or more of a recombinant nucleicacid encoding a circular RNA, or mRNA from a DNA or RNA template and canfurther include translation of a protein from a recombinant circular RNAcomprising an IRES sequence (e.g., a non-native IRES). Thus, forexample, intervening untranslated yet transcribed sequences can bepresent between a promoter sequence and a coding sequence and thepromoter sequence can still be considered to be “operably linked” to thecoding sequence.

As used herein, the term “nonviral-like particle” may refer anyprotein-based particle that is not a virus or viral-like particle. Forexample, in some embodiments, a nonviral-like particle is a proteinnanogel or protein spheres that allow encapsulation.

As used herein in reference to a lipid nanoparticle, the term“decorated” refers to a lipid nanoparticle that is coupled to one ormore targeting agents (e.g., small molecules, peptides, polypeptides,carbohydrates, etc.) The targeting agent binds to one or more peptides,polypeptides, carbohydrates, cells, etc., and allows for targeting ofthe lipid nanoparticle specifically thereto.

Circular RNAs

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are single-stranded RNAs that are joined headto tail and were initially discovered in pathogenic genomes such ashepatitis D virus (HDV) and plant viroids (Kos et al., Nature, 323:558-560 (1986); Sanger et al., PNAS USA, 73: 3852-3856 (1976)). circRNAshave been recognized as a pervasive class of noncoding RNAs ineukaryotic cells (Salzman et al., PLoS One, 7: e30733, (2012); Memczaket al., Nature, 495: 333-338 (2013); Hansen et al., Nature, 495:384-388, (2013)). Typically generated through back splicing, circRNAshave been postulated to function in cell-to-cell information transfer ormemory due to their extraordinary stability (Jeck, W. R. & Sharpless, N.E., Nat Biotech, 32: 453-461, (2014)).

Although the functions of endogenous circRNAs are not known, their largenumber and the presence of viral circRNA genomes necessitate a system ofcircRNA immunity, as evidenced by the recent discoveries of humancircRNA modulation of viral resistance through regulation of NF90/NF 110and autoimmunity through PKR regulation. Circular RNAs can act as potentadjuvants to induce specific T and B cell responses. In addition,circRNA can induce both innate and adaptive immune responses and havethe ability to inhibit the establishment and growth of tumors.

The instant inventors have previously shown that intron identitydictates circRNA immunity. See, e.g., Chen, Y G, et. al, Mol. Cell(2019) 76(1):96-109.e9; Chen, Y G, et. al, Mol. Cell (2017)67(2):228-238.e5. Because introns are not part of the final circRNAproduct, it has been hypothesized that introns may direct the depositionof one or more covalent chemical marks onto circRNA. Among the over 100known RNA chemical modifications, m⁶A is the most abundant modificationon linear mRNAs and long noncoding RNAs, present on 0.2% to 0.6% of alladenosines in mammalian polyA-tailed transcripts (Roundtree et al.,Cell, 169: 1187-1200 (2017)). m⁶A has recently been detected onmammalian circRNAs (Zhou et al., Cell Reports, 20: 2262-2276 (2017)).Human endogenous circRNAs appear to be marked at birth by one or morecovalent m⁶A modifications, based on the introns that program their backsplicing.

The instant disclosure provides a recombinant circular RNA moleculecomprising a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence and a non-native aninternal ribosome entry site (IRES) operably linked to theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence, and DNA sequences encoding thesame. Recombinant circRNA molecules may be generated or engineeredaccording to several methods. For example, recombinant circRNA moleculesmay be generated by back-splicing of linear RNAs. For example, in someembodiments, a recombinant circular RNA is produced by back-splicing ofa downstream 5′ splice site (splice donor) to an upstream 3′ splice site(splice acceptor). The splice donor and/or splice acceptor may be found,for example, in a human intron or portion thereof that is typically usedfor circRNA production at endogenous loci as shown in FIG. 1A. In someembodiments, a recombinant circular RNA is produced by contacting a cellwith a DNA plasmid, wherein the DNA plasmid encodes a linear RNA, andthe linear RNA is back-spliced to produce a recombinant circular RNA. Insome embodiments, the DNA plasmid comprises introns from the mammalianZKSCAN1 gene.

Circular RNAs can be generated by any non-mammalian splicing method. Forexample, linear RNAs containing various types of introns, includingself-splicing group I introns, self-splicing group II introns,spliceosomal introns, and tRNA introns can be circularized. Inparticular, group I and group II introns have the advantage that theycan be readily used for production of circular RNAs in vitro as well asin vivo because of their ability to undergo self-splicing due to theirautocatalytic ribozyme activity.

Alternatively, circular RNAs can be produced in vitro from a linear RNAby chemical or enzymatic ligation of the 5′ and 3′ ends of the RNA.Chemical ligation can be performed, for example, using cyanogen bromide(BrCN) or ethyl-3-(3′-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) foractivation of a nucleotide phosphomonoester group to allowphosphodiester bond formation (Sokolova, FEBS Lett, 232:153-155 (1988);Dolinnaya et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 19: 3067-3072 (1991); Fedorova,Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 15: 1137-1147 (1996)).Alternatively, enzymatic ligation can be used to circularize RNA.Exemplary ligases that can be used include T4 DNA ligase (T4 Dnl), T4RNA ligase 1 (T4 Rnl 1), and T4 RNA ligase 2 (T4 Rnl 2).

In other embodiments, splint ligation may be used to generate circularRNA. Splint ligation involves the use of an oligonucleotide splint thathybridizes with the two ends of a linear RNA to bring the ends of thelinear RNA together for ligation. Hybridization of the splint, which canbe either a deoxyribo-oligonucleotide or a ribooligonucleotide, orientsthe 5′-phosphate and 3′-OH of the RNA ends for ligation. Subsequentligation can be performed using either chemical or enzymatic techniques,as described above. Enzymatic ligation can be performed, for example,with T4 DNA ligase (DNA splint required), T4 RNA ligase 1 (RNA splintrequired) or T4 RNA ligase 2 (DNA or RNA splint). Chemical ligation,such as with BrCN or EDC, is more efficient in some cases than enzymaticligation if the structure of the hybridized splint-RNA complexinterferes with enzymatic activity (see, e.g., Dolinnaya et al. NucleicAcids Res, 21(23): 5403-5407 (1993); Petkovic et al., Nucleic Acids Res,43(4): 2454-2465 (2015)).

While circular RNAs generally are more stable than their linearcounterparts, primarily due to the absence of free ends necessary forexonuclease-mediated degradation, additional modifications may be madeto the recombinant circRNA described herein to further improvestability. Still other kinds of modifications may improvecircularization efficiency, purification of circRNA, and/or proteinexpression from circRNA. For example, the recombinant circRNA may beengineered to include “homology arms” (i.e., 9-19 nucleotides in lengthplaced at the 5′ and 3′ ends of a precursor RNA with the aim of bringingthe 5′ and 3′ splice sites into proximity of one another), spacersequences, and/or a phosphorothioate (PS) cap (Wesselhoeft et al., Nat.Commun., 9: 2629 (2018)). The recombinant circRNA also may be engineeredto include 2′-O-methyl-, -fluoro-or —O-methoxyethyl conjugates,phosphorothioate backbones, or 2′,4′-cyclic 2′-O-ethyl modifications toincrease the stability thereof (Holdt et al., Front Physiol., 9: 1262(2018); Krützfeldt et al., Nature, 438(7068): 685-9 (2005); and Crookeet al., Cell Metab., 27(4): 714-739 (2018)). The recombinant circRNAmolecule also may comprise one or more modifications that reduce theinnate immunogenicity of the circRNA molecule in a host, such as atleast one N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A).

In some embodiments, the recombinant circular RNA molecule is encoded bya nucleic acid that comprises at least two introns and at least oneexon. In some embodiments, a DNA sequence encoding a circular RNAmolecule comprises sequences that encode at least two introns and atleast one exon. The term “exon,” as used herein, refers to a nucleicacid sequence present in a gene which is represented in the mature formof an RNA molecule after excision of introns during transcription. Exonsmay be translated into protein (e.g., in the case of messenger RNA(mRNA)). The term “intron,” as used herein, refers to a nucleic acidsequence present in a given gene which is removed by RNA splicing duringmaturation of the final RNA product. Introns are generally found betweenexons. During transcription, introns are removed from precursormessenger RNA (pre-mRNA), and exons are joined via RNA splicing. In someembodiments, the recombinant circular RNA molecule comprises a nucleicacid sequence which includes one or more exons and one or more introns.

Accordingly, circular RNAs can be generated by splicing of either anendogenous or exogenous intron, as described in WO 2017/222911. As usedherein, the term “endogenous intron” means an intron sequence that isnative to the host cell in which the circRNA is produced. For example, ahuman intron is an endogenous intron when the circRNA is expressed in ahuman cell. An “exogenous intron” means an intron that is heterologousto the host cell in which the circRNA is generated. For example, abacterial intron would be an exogenous intron when the circRNA isexpressed in a human cell. Numerous intron sequences from a wide varietyof organisms and viruses are known and include sequences derived fromgenes encoding proteins, ribosomal RNA (rRNA), or transfer RNA (tRNA).Representative intron sequences are available in various databases,including the Group I Intron Sequence and Structure Database(rna.whu.edu.cn/gissd/), the Database for Bacterial Group II Introns(webapps2.ucalgary.ca/˜groupii/index.html), the Database for MobileGroup II Introns (fp.ucalgary.ca/group2introns), the Yeast IntronDataBase (emblS16 heidelberg.de/Externallnfo/seraphin/yidb.html), theAres Lab Yeast Intron Database(compbio.soe.ucsc.edu/yeast_introns.html), the U12 Intron Database(genome.crg.es/cgibin/u12db/u12db.cgi), and the Exon-Intron Database(bpg.utoledo. edu/˜afedorov/lab/eid.html).

In some embodiments, a DNA molecule encoding a recombinant circular RNAmolecule comprises a self-splicing group I intron. Group I introns are adistinct class of RNA self-splicing introns which catalyze their ownexcision from mRNA, tRNA, and rRNA precursors in a wide range oforganisms. All known group I introns present in eukaryote nucleiinterrupt functional ribosomal RNA genes located in ribosomal DNA loci.Nuclear group I introns appear widespread among eukaryoticmicroorganisms, and the plasmodial slime molds (myxomycetes) contain anabundance of self-splicing introns. The self-splicing group I intronincluded in the circular RNA molecule may be obtained or derived fromany organism, such as, for example, bacteria, bacteriophages, andeukaryotic viruses. Self-splicing group I introns also may be found incertain cellular organelles, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts, andsuch self-splicing introns may be incorporated into the circular RNAmolecule.

In some embodiments, the recombinant circular RNA molecule is generatedfrom a DNA molecule that comprises a self-splicing group I intron of thephage T4 thymidylate synthase (td) gene. The group I intron of phage T4thymidylate synthase (td) gene is well characterized to circularizewhile the exons linearly splice together (Chandry and Belfort, GenesDev., 1: 1028-1037 (1987); Ford and Ares, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,91: 3117-3121 (1994); and Perriman and Ares, RNA, 4: 1047-1054 (1998)).When the td intron order is permuted (i.e., 5′ half placed at the 3′position and vice versa) flanking any exon sequence, the exon iscircularized via two autocatalytic transesterification reactions (Fordand Ares, supra; Puttaraju and Been, Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 33: 49-51(1995)).

In some embodiments, the recombinant circular RNA molecule is encoded bya DNA molecule that comprises a ZKSCAN1 intron. The ZKSCAN1 intron isdescribed in, for example, Yao, Z., et al., Mol. Oncol. (2017)11(4):422-437. In some embodiments, the recombinant circular RNAmolecule is encoded by a DNA molecule that comprises a miniZKSCAN1intron.

The recombinant circular RNA molecule may be of any length or size. Forexample, the recombinant circular RNA molecule may comprise betweenabout 200 nucleotides and about 10,000 nucleotides (e.g., about 300,about 400, about 500, about 600, about 700, about 800, about 900, about1,000, about 2,000, about 3,000, about 4,000, about 5,000, about 6,000,about 7,000, about 8,000, or about 9,000 nucleotides, or a range definedby any two of the foregoing values). In some embodiments, therecombinant circular RNA molecule comprises between about 500 and about6,000 nucleotides (about 550, about 650, about 750, about 850, about950, about 1,100, about 1,200, about 1,300, about 1,400, about 1,500,about 1,600, about 1,700, about 1,800, about 1,900, about 2,100, about2,200, about 2,300, about 2,400, about 2,500, about 2,600, about 2,700,about 2,800, about 2,900, about 3,100, about 3,300, about 3,500, about3,700, about 3,800, about 3,900, about 4,100, about 4,300, about 4,500,about 4,700, about 4,900, about 5,100, about 5,300, about 5,500, about5,700, or about 5,900 nucleotides, or a range defined by any two of theforegoing values). In one embodiment, the recombinant circular RNAmolecule comprises about 1,500 nucleotides.

In some embodiments, a recombinant circular RNA molecule comprises aprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence region and an internal ribosomeentry site (IRES) sequence region operably linked to the protein-codingnucleic acid sequence region, wherein the IRES comprises: at least onesequence region having secondary structure element; and a sequenceregion that is complementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA); wherein theIRES has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9 kJ/mol and amelting temperature of at least 35.0° C. In some embodiments, the IRESsequence is linked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region ina non-native configuration.

The disclosure also provides a recombinant circular RNA moleculecomprising a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region and an internalribosome entry site (IRES) sequence region operably linked to theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence; wherein the IRES is encoded by anyone of the nucleic acid sequences listed in of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQID NO: 229-17201, or a nucleic acid sequence that has at least 90% or atleast 95% identity or homology thereto. In some embodiments, the IRESsequence is linked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region ina non-native configuration.

circRNA Internal Ribosome Entry Sites

The recombinant circular RNAs described herein comprise an internalribosome entry site (IRES) operably linked to a protein-coding sequenceof the circRNA in a non-native configuration. Inclusion of an IRESpermits the translation of one or more open reading frames from acircular RNA. The IRES element attracts a eukaryotic ribosomaltranslation initiation complex and promotes translation initiation. Itwill be appreciated that there are two known mechanisms by whichtranslation is initiated in eukaryotes. The first is the canonicalcap-dependent mechanism that is used by the vast majority of eukaryoticmRNAs, which requires an m⁷G cap at the 5′ end of the mRNA, initiatorMet-tRNAmet, more than a dozen initiation factor proteins, directionalscanning, and GTP hydrolysis to place a translationally competentribosome at the start codon. The second mechanism is cap-independentinitiation that is used by some mRNAs as well as manyeukaryote-infecting viruses. This mechanism bypasses the need for thecap and often many of the protein factors, using cis-acting IRES RNAelements to recruit the ribosome and initiate protein synthesis. Thereis great diversity among viral IRES RNAs in terms of their sequences,proposed secondary structures, and functional requirements for proteinfactors, but all drive a mode of translation initiation that depends onspecific RNA sequences and likely specific RNA structures in the IRES.

Accordingly, provided herein are various IRES sequences which, whenpresent in a circRNA, may drive translation of a protein. In someembodiments, the IRES of a circRNA may be operably linked to aprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence. In some embodiments, the IRES of acircRNA is operably linked to a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence ina non-native configuration. In some embodiments, the IRES is a humanIRES. In some embodiments, the IRES is a viral IRES.

As used herein, the term “non-native configuration” refers to a linkagebetween an IRES and a protein-coding nucleic acid that does not occur ina naturally occurring circRNA molecule. For example, a viral IRES may beoperably linked to a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence in a circularRNA, or an IRES that is not found in naturally occurring circRNAmolecules may be operably linked to a protein-coding nucleic acidsequence in a circRNA. In some embodiments, an IRES that is found innaturally occurring circRNA molecules operably linked to a certainprotein-coding nucleic acid is operably linked to a differentprotein-coding nucleic acid (i.e., a nucleic acid to which the IRES isnot operably linked in any naturally-occurring circRNA). In someembodiments, an IRES that is found in naturally occurring linear mRNAsis operably linked to a protein coding sequence in a circular RNA.

A number of linear IRES sequences are known and may be included in arecombinant circular RNA molecule as described herein. For example,linear IRES sequences may be derived from a wide variety of viruses,such as from leader sequences of picornaviruses (e.g.,encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) UTR) (Jang et al., J. Virol., 63:1651-1660 (1989)), the polio leader sequence, the hepatitis A virusleader, the hepatitis C virus IRES, human rhinovirus type 2 IRES(Dobrikova et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100(25): 15125-15130 (2003)),an IRES element from the foot and mouth disease virus (Ramesh et al.,Nucl. Acid Res., 24: 2697-2700 (1996)), and a giardiavirus IRES(Garlapati et al., J. Biol. Chem., 279(5): 3389-3397 (2004)). A varietyof nonviral IRES sequences also can be included in a circular RNAmolecule, including but not limited to, IRES sequences from yeast, thehuman angiotensin II type 1 receptor IRES (Martin et al., Mol. CellEndocrinol., 212: 51-61 (2003)), fibroblast growth factor IRESs (e.g.,FGF-1 IRES and FGF-2 IRES, Martineau et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 24(17):7622-7635 (2004)), vascular endothelial growth factor IRES (Baranick etal., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105(12): 4733-4738 (2008); Stein etal., Mol. Cell. Biol., 18(6): 3112-3119 (1998); Bert et al., RNA, 12(6):1074-1083(2006)), and insulin-like growth factor 2 IRES (Pedersen etal., Biochem. J., 363(Pt 1): 37-44 (2002)).

IRES sequences and vectors encoding IRES elements are commerciallyavailable from a variety of sources, such as, for example, Clontech(Mountain View, CA), Invivogen (San Diego, CA), Addgene (Cambridge, MA)and GeneCopoeia (Rockville, MD), and IRESite: The database ofexperimentally verified IRES structures (iresite.org). Notably, thesedatabases focus on activity of IRES sequences in mRNA (i.e., linearRNAs), and do not focus on circRNA IRES activity profiles.

In some embodiments, the IRES comprises at least one RNA secondarystructure element. Intramolecular RNA base pairing is often the basis ofRNA secondary structure and in some circumstances be a criticaldeterminant of overall macromolecular folding. In conjunction withcofactors and RNA binding proteins (RBPs), secondary structure elementscan form higher order tertiary structures and thereby confer catalytic,regulatory, and scaffolding functions to RNA. Thus, the IRES maycomprise any RNA secondary structure element that imparts suchstructural or functional determinants. In some embodiments, the RNAsecondary structure may be formed from the nucleotides at about position40 to about position 60 of the IRES, relative to the 5′ end thereof. Themost common RNA secondary structures are helices, loops, bulges, andjunctions, with stem-loops or hairpin loops being the most commonelement of RNA secondary structure. A stem-loop is formed when the RNAchains fold back on themselves to form a double helical tract called thestem, with the unpaired nucleotides forming a single-stranded regioncalled the loop. Bulges and internal loops are formed by separation ofthe double helical tract on either one strand (bulge) or on both strands(internal loops) by unpaired nucleotides. A tetraloop is a four-basepairs hairpin RNA structure. There are three common families oftetraloop in ribosomal RNA: UNCG, GNRA, and CUUG (N is one of the fournucleotides and R is a purine). Pseudoknots are formed when nucleotidesfrom the hairpin loop pair with a single stranded region outside of thehairpin to form a helical segment. RNA secondary structure is furtherdescribed in, e.g., Vandivier et al., Annu Rev Plant Biol., 67: 463-488(2016); and Tinoco and Bustamante, supra). In some embodiments, the IRESof the recombinant circRNA molecule comprises at least one stem-loopstructure. The at least one RNA secondary structure element may belocated at any position of the IRES, so long as translation isefficiently initiated from the IRES. In some embodiments, the stemportion of the stem-loop may comprise from 3-7 base pairs, 4, 5, 6, 7,8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 base pairs or more. The loop portion of the stem-loopmay comprise from 3-12 nucleotides, including 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12 or more nucleotides. The stem-loop structure may also have on eitherside of the stem one or more bulges (mismatches). In some embodiments,the RNA secondary structure element is formed from the nucleotides atabout position 40 to about position 60 of the IRES, wherein the firstnucleic acid at the 5′ end of the IRES is considered to be position 1.In some embodiments, the sequence that is complementary to an 18S rRNAis located 5′ to the at least one RNA secondary structure element (i.e.,in the range of about position 1 to about position 40 of the IRES, SeeFIG. 19A). In some embodiments, the sequence that is complementary to an18S rRNA is located 3′ to the a least one RNA secondary structureelement (i.e., in the range of about position 61 to the end of the IRES,See FIG. 19B). Sequences encoding exemplary secondary structure-formingRNA sequences that may be included in the IRES described herein areprovided in SEQ ID NO: 17202-28976.

In some embodiments, the at least one RNA secondary structure element ofthe IRES is a stem-loop. In some embodiments, the at least one RNAsecondary structure element is encoded by any one of the nucleic acidsequences of SEQ ID NO: 17202-28976. In some embodiments, the at leastone RNA secondary structure element is encoded by a nucleic acidsequence having at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%,at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, atleast 97%, at least 98%, or at least 99% sequence identity relative toany one of SEQ ID NO: 17202-28976. In some embodiments, the at least oneRNA secondary structure element is encoded by a nucleic acid sequencehaving at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, atleast 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9 at least 10, or morenucleotide substitutions relative to any one of SEQ ID NO: 17202-28976.

RNA secondary structure typically can be predicted from experimentalthermodynamic data coupled with chemical mapping, nuclear magneticresonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and/or sequence comparison. In someembodiments, the RNA secondary structure is predicted by amachine-learning/deep-learning algorithm (e.g., CNN) (See, Zhao, Q., etal., “Review of Machine-Learning Methods for RNA Secondary StructurePrediction,” Sep. 1, 2020 (available on the world wide web at:arxiv.org/abs/2009.08868). A variety of algorithms and software packagesfor RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis are known in the artand can be used in the context of the present disclosure (see, e.g.,Hofacker I. L. (2014) Energy-Directed RNA Structure Prediction. In:Gorodkin J., Ruzzo W. (eds) RNA Sequence, Structure, and Function:Computational and Bioinformatic Methods. Methods in Molecular Biology(Methods and Protocols), vol 1097. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ; Mathews etal., supra; Mathews, et al. “RNA secondary structure prediction,”Current Protocols in Nucleic Acid Chemistry, Chapter 11 (2007): Unit11.2. doi:10.1002/0471142700.nc1102s28; Lorenz et al., Methods, 103:86-98 (2016); Mathews et al., Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol., 2(12):a003665 (2010)).

In some embodiments, the IRES of the recombinant circRNA may comprise anucleic acid sequence that is complementary to 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA).Eukaryotic ribosomes, also known as “80S” ribosomes, have two unequalsubunits, designated small subunit (40S) (also referred to as “SSU”) andlarge subunit (60S) (also referred to as “LSU”) according to theirsedimentation coefficients. Both subunits contain dozens of ribosomalproteins arranged on a scaffold composed of ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Ineukaryotes, eukaryotic 80S ribosomes contain greater than 5500nucleotides of rRNA: 18S rRNA in the small subunit, and 5S, 5.8S, and25S rRNA in the large subunit. The small subunit monitors thecomplementarity between tRNA anticodon and mRNA, while the large subunitcatalyzes peptide bond formation. Ribosomes typically contain about 60%rRNA and about 40% protein. Although the primary structure of rRNAsequences can vary across organisms, base-pairing within these sequencescommonly forms stem-loop configurations.

In some embodiments, the IRES of the recombinant circRNA may compriseany nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to any eukaryotic 18SrRNA sequence. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid sequence that iscomplementary to 18S rRNA is encoded by any one of the nucleic acidsequences set forth in Table 1. In some embodiments, the nucleic acidsequence that is complementary to 18S rRNA is encoded by a nucleic acidsequence that has at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least96%, at least 97%, at least 98%, or at least 99% identity or homology toa sequence set forth in Table 1. In some embodiments, the nucleic acidsequence that is complementary to 18S rRNA is encoded by a nucleic acidsequence that has at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, atleast 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10, ormore nucleotide substitutions relative to a nucleic acid sequence setforth in Table 1.

TABLE 1Illustrative DNA sequences that encode RNA sequences that are complementary to18S RNA SEQ ID NO: Nucleic Acid Sequence 28977CACCTACGGAAACCTTGTTACGACTTTTACTTCCTCTAGATAGTCAAGTTCGACCGTCTTCTCAGCGCTCCGCCAGGGCCGTGGGCCGACCCCGGCGGGGCCGATCCGAGGGCCTCACTAAACCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCGACGGGCGGTGTGTACAAAGGGCAGGGACTTAATCAACGCAAGCTTATGACCCGCACTTACTGGGAATTCCTCGTTCATGGGGAATAATTGCAATCCCC 28978GGGACGCCGACCGCTCGGGGGTCGCGTAACTAGTTAGCATGCCAGAGTCTCGTTCGTTATCGGAATTAACCAGACAAATCGCTCCACCAACTAAGAACGGCCATGCACCACCACCC 28979GTTTATGGTCGGAACTACGACGGTATCTGATCGTCTTCGAACCTCCGACTTTCGTTCTTGATTAATGAAAACATTCTTGGCAAATGCTTTCGCTCTGGTCCGTCTTGCGCCGGTCCAAGAATTTCACCTCTAGCGGCGCAATACGAATGCCCCCGGCCGTCCCTCTTAATCATGGCCTCAGTTCCGAAAACCAACAAAATAGAACCGCGGTCCTATTCCATTATTCCTAGCTGCGGTATCCAGGCGGCTCGGGCCTGCTTTGAACACTCTAATTTTTTCAAAGTAAACGCTTCGGG 28980AGAGCATCGAGGGGGCGCCGAGAGGCAAGGGGCGGGGACGGGCGGTGGCTCGCCTCGCGGCGGACCGCCCGCCCGCTCCC 28981 TACGAGCTTT 28982ATACGCTATTGGAGCTGGAATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCACCAGACTTGCCCTCCAATGGATCCTCGTTAAAGGATTTAAAGTGGACTCATTCCAATTACAGGGCCTCGAAAGAGTCCTGTA 28983GGGGGCGTGCGATCGGCCCGAGGTTATCTAGAGTCACCAAAGCCGCCGGCGCCCGCCCCCCGGCCGGGGCCGGAGAGGGG

The most commonly used criterion for RNA secondary structure predictionis the minimum free energy (MFE), since, according to thermodynamics,the MFE structure is not only the most stable, but also the mostprobable one in thermodynamic equilibrium. The MFE of an RNA or DNAmolecule is affected by three properties of nucleotides in the RNA/DNAsequence: number, composition, and arrangement. For example, longersequences are on average more stable because they can form more stackingand hydrogen bond interactions, guanine-cytosine (GC)-rich RNAs aretypically more stable than adenine-uracil (AU)-rich sequences, andnucleotide order influences the folding structure stability because itdetermines the number and the extension of loops and double-helixconformations. It has been found that mRNAs and microRNA precursors,unlike other non-coding RNAs, have greater negative MFE than expectedgiven their nucleotide numbers and compositions. Thus, free energy alsocan be employed as a criterion for the identification of functionalRNAs.

The IRES of the recombinant circRNA molecule may comprise a minimum freeenergy (MFE) of less than about −15 kJ/mol (e.g., less than about −16kJ/mol, less than about −17 kJ/mol, less than about −18.5 kJ/mol, lessthan about −19 kJ/mol, less than about −18.9 kJ/mol, less than about −20kJ/mol, less than about −30 kJ/mol). In some embodiments, the MFE isgreater than about −90 kJ/mol (e.g., greater than about −85 kJ/mol,greater than about −80 kJ/mol, greater than about 70 kJ/mol, greaterthan about −60 kJ/mol, greater than about −50 kJ/mol, greater than about−40 kJ/mol). In some embodiments, the IRES has a has a minimum freeenergy (MFE) of about −18.9 kJ/mol or less. In some embodiments, theIRES has a MFE in the range of about −15.9 kJ/mol to about −79.9 kJ/mol.In some embodiments, the IRES may comprise a MFE in the range of about12.55 kJ/mol to about −100.15 kJ/mol. In some embodiments, the IRES is aviral IRES and has a MFE in the range of about −15.9 kJ/mol to about−79.9 kJ/mol. In some embodiments, the IRES is a human IRES and has aMFE in the range of about −12.55 kJ/mol to about −100.15 kJ/mol.

In some embodiments, the at least one secondary structure element of anIRES of may comprise a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than about −0.4kJ/mol, less than about −0.5 kJ/mol, less than about −0.6 kJ/mol, lessthan about −0.7 kJ/mol, less than about −0.8 kJ/mol, less than about−0.9 kJ/mol, or less than about −1.0 kJ/mol. In some embodiments, the atleast one secondary structure element of the IRES may comprise a MFE ofless than about −0.7 kJ/mol.

In some embodiments, the RNA sequence comprising the nucleotides atabout position 40 to about position 60 of an IRES of a circRNA describedherein may comprise a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than about −0.4kJ/mol, less than about −0.5 kJ/mol, less than about −0.6 kJ/mol, lessthan about −0.7 kJ/mol, less than about −0.8 kJ/mol, less than about−0.9 kJ/mol, or less than about −1.0 kJ/mol. In some embodiments, theRNA sequence comprising the nucleotides at about position 40 to aboutposition 60 of the IRES may comprise a MFE of less than about −0.7kJ/mol.

As discussed, above, the minimum free energy of a particular RNA (e.g.,an RNA produced from a DNA sequence) may be determined using a varietyof computational methods and algorithms. The most commonly used softwareprograms, employed to predict the secondary RNA or DNA structures by MFEalgorithms, make use of the so-called nearest-neighbor energy model.This model uses free energy rules based on empirical thermodynamicparameters (Mathews et al., J Mol Biol, 288: 911-940 (1999); and Mathewset al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101: 7287-7292 (2004)) and computes theoverall stability of an RNA or DNA structure by adding independentcontributions of local free energy interactions due to adjacent basepairs and loop regions. In sequences with homogeneous nucleotidearrangements and compositions, the additive and independent nature ofthe local free energy contributions suggests a linear relationshipbetween computed MFE and sequence length (Trotta, E., PLoS One, 9(11):e113380 (2014)). Algorithms for determining MFE are further describedin, e.g., Hajiaghayi et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 13: 22 (2012); Mathews,D. H., Bioinformatics, Volume 21, Issue 10: 2246-2253 (2005); and Doshiet al., BMC Bioinformatics, 5: 105 (2004) doi 10.1186/1471-2105-5-105).

One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the meltingtemperature (T_(m)) of a particular circRNA molecule may also beindicative of stability. Indeed, RNA sequences with high T_(m) generallycontain thermo-stable functionally important RNA structures (see, e.g.,Nucleic Acids Res., 45(10): 6109-6118 (2017)). Thus, in someembodiments, the IRES of the recombinant circRNA molecule has a meltingtemperature of at least 35.0° C. In some embodiments, the IRES of therecombinant circRNA molecule has a melting temperature of at least 35.0°C., but not more than about 85° C. In some embodiments, in someembodiments, the RNA secondary structure has a melting temperature of atleast 35° C., at least 36° C., at least 37° C., at least 38° C., atleast 39° C., at least 40° C., at least 41° C., at least 42° C., atleast 43° C., at least 44° C., at least 45° C., at least 46° C., atleast 47° C., at least 48° C., at least 49° C. or greater. In someembodiments, the melting temperature is not more than about 85° C., notmore than about 75° C., not more than about 70° C., not more than about65° C., not more than about 60° C., not more than about 55° C., not morethan about 50° C. or less.

The melting temperature of a particular nucleic acid molecule can bedetermined using thermodynamic analyses and algorithms described hereinand known in the art (see, e.g., Kibbe W. A., Nucleic Acids Res., 35(WebServer issue): W43-W46 (2007). doi:10.1093/nar/gkm234; and Dumousseau etal., BMC Bioinformatics, 13: 101 (2012).doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-101).

In some embodiments, the IRES comprises at least one RNA secondarystructure element; and a nucleic acid sequence that is complementary toan 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA); wherein the IRES has a minimum free energy(MFE) of −18.9 kJ/mol or less and a melting temperature of at least35.0° C. In some embodiments, the RNA secondary structure element of theIRES has a has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9 kJ/mol,and is formed from the nucleotides at about position 40 to aboutposition 60 of the IRES, wherein the first nucleic acid at the 5′ end ofthe IRES is considered to be position 1. In some embodiments, the RNAsecondary structure element has a melting temperature of at least 35.0°C., and is formed from the nucleotides at about position 40 to aboutposition 60 of the IRES, wherein the first nucleic acid at the 5′ end ofthe IRES is considered to be position 1.

Because circRNA molecules are often generated from linear RNAs byback-splicing of a downstream 5′ splice site (splice donor) to anupstream 3′ splice site (splice acceptor), the recombinant circular RNAmolecule may further comprise a back-splice junction. In someembodiments, the IRES may be located within about 100 to about 200nucleotides of the back-splice junction. In addition, it has beenobserved that regions of RNA with higher G-C content have more stablesecondary structures than RNA strands with lower G-C content. Thus, insome embodiments, the IRES of the recombinant circRNA molecule mayfurther comprise a minimum level of G-C base pairs. For example, thenon-native IRES of the recombinant circRNA molecule may comprise a G-Ccontent of at least 25% (e.g., at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%,at least 45% or more), but not more than about 75% (e.g., about 70%,about 65%, about 60%, about 55%, about 50% or less). In someembodiments, the IRES has a G-C content of at least 25%.

G-C content of a given nucleic acid sequence may be measured using anymethod known in the art, such as, for example chemical mapping methods(see, e.g., Cheng et al., PNAS, 114 (37): 9876-9881 (2017); and Tian, S.and Das, R., Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, 49: e7doi:10.1017/S0033583516000020 (2016)).

Exemplary sequences encoding IRESs for use in the circRNA molecules ofthe present disclosure are set forth in of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ IDNO: 229-17201. Thus, the disclosure further provides a recombinantcircular RNA molecule comprising a protein-coding nucleic acid sequenceand an IRES operably linked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequencein a non-native configuration; wherein the IRES is encoded by any one ofthe nucleic acid sequences listed in of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO:229-17201.

In some embodiments, the IRES is encoded by any one of the nucleic acidsequences set forth in any one of SEQ ID NO: 1-228. In some embodiments,the IRES is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence that has at least 80%, atleast 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, atleast 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98, or atleast 99% identity to any one of the nucleic acid sequences of SEQ IDNO: 1-228. In some embodiments, the IRES is encoded by a nucleic acidsequence that has at least 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, atleast 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10 ormore nucleotide substitutions relative to any one of the sequences ofSEQ ID NO: 1-228.

In some embodiments, the IRES is encoded by any one of the nucleic acidsequences set forth in any one of SEQ ID NO: 229-17201. In someembodiments, the IRES is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence that has atleast 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, atleast 93%, at least 94%, at least 95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, atleast 98, or at least 99% identity or homology to any one of the nucleicacid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 229-17201. In some embodiments, the IRES isencoded by a nucleic acid sequence that has at least 1, at least 2, atleast 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, at least 7, at least 8, atleast 9, at least 10 or more nucleotide substitutions relative to anyone of the sequences in any one of SEQ ID NO: 229-17201.

In some embodiments, the IRES is encoded by the nucleic acid sequencesdenoted Index 876 (SEQ ID NO: 531), 6063 (SEQ ID NO: 2270), 7005 (SEQ IDNO: 2602), 8228 (SEQ ID NO: 3042), or 8778 (SEQ ID NO: 3244). In someembodiments, the IRES is encoded by the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ IDNO: 33948.

In some embodiments, the IRES is encoded by any one of the nucleic acidsequences set forth in Table 2. In some embodiments, the IRES is encodedby a nucleic acid sequence that has at least 80%, at least 85%, at least90%, at least 91%, at least 92%, at least 93%, at least 94%, at least95%, at least 96%, at least 97%, at least 98, or at least 99% identityor homology to one or the nucleic acid sequences of Table 2. In someembodiments, the IRES is encoded by a nucleic acid sequence that has atleast 1, at least 2, at least 3, at least 4, at least 5, at least 6, atleast 7, at least 8, at least 9, at least 10 or more nucleotidesubstitutions relative to any one of the sequences in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Illustrative Sequences Encoding IRES sequences Oligo- nucleotideSEQ ID Identifier Sequence NO: 4173CATCCTCCTGCTGAAGTGACAAGCCACGCTGCTTCTGGAGCCAAAGC 33946TGACCAAGAAGAACAAATCCACCCCAGATCTAGACTCAGGTCACCTCCTGAAGCCCTCGTTCAGGGTCGATATCCCCACATCAAGGACGGTGAGGATCTTAAAGACCACTCAACAGAAAGTAAAAAA 2125GCAGAAGGGAAACGTGAAGAAGGTGAAGATGGCGGTGGCCAGGGC 33947CGGGGTCTTGGGAGTCCAGTGGCTGCAAAGGGCATCCCGGAACGTGATGCCGCTGGGCGCACGGACAGCCTCCCACATGACCAAGGACATGTTCCCGGGGCCCTATCCTAGGACCCCAGAAGAACGGGC 6742AGACTCGGGAACTGCCTGAATGTGGTTTGGGACACGAGACCTCATC 33948ATATTGATGAGCGAACAAACAAGAACATTTCCTCCCTCCCCTCCTTTGAATTGAAATGGCACATTAAGACTTGTCACGGCTTCTCACTGGGACTGGAGACCTCGTTCCTTCACCCCGCGTGTCGCCAG 8839AGGTGGGCGGTGGCGGTAGGTGGGTGGCCAGCGACTGGCAACGCGG 33949TGGCTTAGACGCGCGAGATCCGGCCAGGGTCAGAGTACTGTAAGATTGATGTTAAAGGCATGGTGTTCACCCCACTTCATCAGCGTACATAAGTTATCTCTTCTTTTGGACCCTTATTTTATGCCATA 8279GGAGGCAGGTTGATGTGTTTGTGCTTCCTTCTACAGCCAATATGAAA 33950AGGCCTAGTAAGTGGGGTCGGGAGGCGGGCGTGGAGGGACCCACGTCTGGAAGTTGCTGCAGCCACCACGACGCTCTTCTACGGCTACGGCTTTGTCTCTGCTGAGTTAAAGAAAGCAAGTAAACGC 1637ATTTATAAGCAATAGTAGCTTATTTGGCTCACAGTTCTGGAGGCTGA 33951GAAGATCGTGAGGCTGCATCTGGCAAGGGCCTTCTTGCTGCTTCATAACATGGCAGAAGACATCATGCGGGTGTGTGTCTGGGGAAGAGACTTACAGAAGTGGAGTTGCTGAGTCAAAGATCTAACC 27147TCTTTTGGTGCAGAAGGTGACGGGAAACAGGCCGCAGACCTGAACT 33952TCCAACCGTATGTAGGCGAGAAGCCGGTGCCGATACTCCCACTATCCCACAATGTCCCACTGGGCCCCAGAGTGGAAGAGGGCGGAGGCTAATCCAAGAGACCTTGGGGCCAGCTGGGATGTCAGGGG 7408ATCCACCATGAAGCAGAATCTAAAGAAAAAGGTCCAAGCATGAAGG 33953AACCAAATCCAATTTCTCCACCAATTTTCCATGGTCTGGACACCCTAACCGTGATGGGCATTGCGTTTGCAGCCTTTGTGATCGGAGCACTCCTGACGGGGGCCTTGTGGTACATCTATTCTCACACA 29135CAGATTAGAGGACGGGCGCTTTGGAGCCGGCCCCAGGCAGCGTGTG 33954TCGGTCGCCTAGTCTGGAGAACTAGTCCTCGACTCACGTGCAAGGATGATGCTGAAAGGAATAACAAGGCTTATCTCTAGGATCCATAAGGCCAAGCATGGGGATCAGCACGAGGGTCAGCACTACAA 7806CTCTCGGGGGCCAGGGGTCATCGGTTTGACCCCTGACCTATAAGCCA 33955AGATACCCCATAAACACACTCAGAAAGCAGAGAAAAAGGACAAGAGTCTGTGTTTGAGAGGGGGTCTGCCATTCCTGCTTGGGGACTGGTGGGGAAGAGGGCCAGGACATCTTCTGAGCCAGGACGT 661AGTCTGGCTGCGGCGGCAGAGCTGAAGTGAGCGGAGCCACCAGGAG 33956GCCATGTCGGGTGAGGACGCTGAGGTCCGGGCAGTCTCTGAAGATGTCTCCAATGGAAGCAGTGGCTCGCCCAGCCCTGGGGACACACTGCCCTGGAACCTTGGGAAAACGCAGCGGAGCCGGCGCAG 1258ATCTGCCTCAGCCTCTTTGTCACTGCCTGGACCATTGTCCCTGCTGTT 33957TCTCAGACAGCATAGAGGCTGAGGCTGGGGCCAGGACCCAGACAGAGACACACGGTCACTGCAGCTGAAGCCGCTGCCCCTGCTACAGGCACCACCAGGACCAGCTGATCATTCCAGCCCACAGCA 6757CTCAGGCTGTGGCCCCACCTGCCCCCAAGCCCACCCAGGCTGGGGA 33958AGGAACGCTGTCAGAGGCCCTGCTGCAGCTGCAGTTTGATGATGAAGACCTGGGGGCCTTGCTTGGCAACAGCACAGACCCAGCTGTGTTCACAGACCTGGCATCCGTCGACAACTCCGAGTTTCAGC 5825CTCAAGGTTTTGAAGAGACAGGGGACACGCTCTATGCCCCCTATTCC 33959ACACATTTTCAGCTGCAGAACCAGCCTCCCCAAAAGGAATTCTCCATCCCACGGGCCCACGCTTGGCCGAGCCCTTACAAAGACTATGAAGTAAAGAAAGAGGGCAGCTAACTCTGTCCTGAAGAGT 27115GCTTCCGTAGAGGCCAGCTGGTTGCTACGCAGCAACAGGAAACATT 33960CCGCGCTACCGAGTACTTTCTACTCCCGACCAGGCATTGCTCTCTCTGGAGACCCTCGGCGGTGGTTGCTGTATTTTGACTTGGAGTAAGGATGACTTTTCGGGCCACAGATAGTGAATTTGACCTGA 3130CTGGAGGGCCGCACTCCCGTTCCAGCCAGGCTGAGCCTTCTGTCCCC 33961TGCCTCTGGGGCCTGGGAACCCCCCTTCTTCTTTCTCCTGAATGGCACCCCCGCCCTAGAATCCAGACACCGAGTTTCCCACTGTGGCTGGTTCAAGGAGCTCCCTGGTGACAGTCTGTGGCTGAGC 5065TAGAGTGGGGGGTGGAAGATGATTCTCGCCTGTTGCTGGGGATTTAT 33962GAACATGGCTATGGAAACTGGGAGTTAATTAAAACAGACCCAGAGCTTAAATTAACTGACAAAATTCTGCCGGTGGAGACAGATAAAAAGCCTCAGGGGAAGCAGCTACAGACCCGAGCGGATTACT 8066AGCGGCTGCAGCATCCAGCCAGCTTGGATGTCTGGCCTGTGAGCCTG 33963GGGAAACTATTATTAATAATATTTACTGTTGATAATATTGGGGAAAACAGCCCTTAACTCTGAGGTTTCTGCTGTGCTCCTTTCCAAAACAGACTTCCAGGACTCTGAAGAAACAGTTACAAGCAGG 1952AAGGGAGGAGGCGCCGAGCTGACCGGGCGACGCCGCGGGAGGTTCT 33964GGAAACGCCGGGAGCTGCGAGTGTCCAGACACTTCCCTCTGTGACCATGAAACTCTGGGTGTCTGCATTGCTGATGGCCTGGTTTGGTGTCCTGAGCTGTGTGCAGGCCGAATTCTTCACCTCTATTG 5020GCGAACTGAAGGTGGCCCAAGGGAAGGCTCTGCAAGAGAATTTGGC 33965CCTCCTGACCCAGACCCTAGCTGAAAGAGAAGAGGAGGTGGAGACTCTGCGGGGACAAATCCAGGAACTGGAGAAGCAACGGGAAATGCAGAAGGCTGCTTTGGAATTGCTGTCTCTGGACCTGAAGA 8766AGGAAGCCGAGGAAGGCTGTGTTTCTGACTCACACGGGGGAGTCGG 33966GGGAGTCGTAAACAACCCTGAAGAGAACAGCCAGGCCTGGCGCTCTGGGCTTGGTCCTGGGACACCCGTTTGACACTGTAAAGGTGAGGCTGCAGACCCAGACCACCTACCGGGGCATCGTTGATTGC 27433CTGCCTCCCCCCCGCTCCCGCTCCCCTGAGCCCAGCCAGACCCCGCG 33967CCGCCCGCGCCCCGCTCGACTCCGGAGGCTCCCGCAGCCCCGGCGTCCGCCCCGCTGCCCCCTCCCCCGGGGGCCATGGGGGCGCCCCCGGGCTACCGGCCCTCAGCTTGGGTGCATCTCCTCCACC 27818CTCAGTGAAGCAACGAGGATGCCGGGGAGAGGGAAGGGGCTGGGC 33968TCTGGGCGGTGCCAAGTCTGTGAGGGGGCGCGGTCACCGCCCAGGGTTCCCACGAACGCCAAGGCGGCCACGTCCTGCTCCCCCTGGTGAAGAAGCTGCCCTGGGCTTGTCGTCCTAGGGTCTCCAGAC 8861CTGATGTGAGCTAGTTTGTCTGGTTGAGTTGGATGTTTAAATAGAAG 33969GCAGAACAACAACAGGTACTCCACATCAGCATTCTCAAGACTGGAGAAGTTAGGCCTCAGACATCCCAAGCCTTCTCCTTTCATTGGAAACTTGACATTTTTCCGCCAGGGTTTTTGGGAAAGCCAA 8040GCCACATTCCACACTAACGTGTTGGTGAATTCTTCTGGGCATTGCCA 33970GTACCTGCCTCCAGGCATATTCAAGAGTTCCTGCTACATCGATGTACGCTGGTTTCCCTTTGATGTGCAGCACTGCAAACTGAAGTTTGGGTCCTGGTCTTACGGAGGCTGGTCCTTGGATCTGCAG 27907TCCTGCCTCGGCAACCCCGGGCCCTGAGGGCAGGCCCCAACCGCGG 33971AGGAGCAGGAGAGGGCGGAGGCCGGCGGGCCATGCCCTGGTCGTCCCGCGGCGCCCTCCTTCGGGACCTGGTCCTGGGCGTGCTGGGCACCGCCGCCTTCCTGCTCGACCTGGGCACCGACCTGTGGG 2392AAGTTTGAAACTGGTAACTTCGGGAGTTGAGCCACGAGCTGTTGTGC 33972ATCCAGAGGTGGAATTGGGGCCCGGCATTCCCTCCTCGTCCCGGGCTGGCCCTTGCCCCCACCCTGCAACTCCTGGTTGAGATGGGCTCAGCCAAGAGCGTCCCAGTCACACCAGCGCGGCCTCCGC 7802AGCCTTCGCTGGATCTCCTTCCCGAACTCACAAATCCTGACGAGCTC 33973CTGTCTTATCTGGACCCCCCCGACCTGCCGAGCAATAGTAACGATGACCTCCTGTCTCTATTTGAGAACAACTGAGGGCCACCCGGTCGGGGCCATCCCTCCACACTCTGCATCCTACCCCACCTAC 7655TTTTTAGAGGTTGGTTGTTGTGTTTTAGGATTCTGTCCATTTTCTTTTA 33974AAGTTATAAACACGTACTTGTGCGAATTATTTTTTTAAAGTGATTTGCCATTTTTGAAAGCGTATTTAATGATAGAATACTATCGAGCCAACATGTACTGACATGGAAAGATGTCAAAGATATGT 981AGCCAGCGGACGTCCAGGAACCGGGATGCCTCCAGCAGTGAGGCGG 33975TCAGCCTGCAGCATGGGATGGCTGTGGATCTTTGGGGCAGCCCTGGGGCAGTGTCTGGGCTACAGTTCACAGCAGCAAAGGGTGCCATTTCTTCAGCCTCCCGGTCAAAGTCAACTGCAAGCGAGTTA 5027GGGACCAGGAACTGGAGGCTCTGCAGCAAGAACAGCAGCAGGCCCA 33976GGGACAGGAGGAGAGGGTGAAGGAAAAGGCAGACGCCCTCCAGGGAGCTCTGGAGCAAGCCCATATGACACTGAAGGAGCGTCATGGAGAGCTTCAGGACCACAAGGAACAGGCACGAAGGCTGGAGG 7683CTACTCCGGAGCCTGAGGTGGGAGGATCGCTTGAGTCTGGGAGGCA 33977GAGGCTGCATTGAGCTATGATCATGGCACTGCATTCCAGCCTGGGTGACAGTGCAAGACCTTGTCTCAGAATAAATAAAGTATGTGATGAAGATGTGCATACATTATATGCAAATACTGTTTTTTTTT 8650CACCAATTCGGCTGGCGTCTCCGAGACCGCGGACTCCCGTAGGGTCC 33978CCGTGGCCCCGAGTTGTAGTCGGGACACCCCGGCCGCGGGTGATCGTCGGGTCTCCACGCGCCCGGGTCGCTGACGCGGATCCGGCCTCGGCGCCTTCTCAGGGCGCCCTGCAAGGCCGCAGGCAGG 6898CCTCCTCTCTGGCTAATCAACAGCTGCCCCCAGCCTGTGGTGCCAGG 33979CAACTCAGCAAGCTGAAAAGGTTCCTTACTACCCTGCAGCAGTTTGGCAATGACATTTCACCCGAGATAGGAGAAAGAGTTCGCACCCTCGTTCTGGGACTAGTGAACTCCACTTTGACAATTGAAG 2042TTTAGTGTCACAGGAGACACGAGGGCAAAGTGCTGAGGAAACTCTA 33980GAGCAACATCGGAATGCATGGTGAAGCATCAGATGGTGAAGGAGAAGGAGACACAGAAGTGATGCAGCAGGAGACAGTTCCAGTTCCTGTACCTTCAGAGAAAACCAAACAGCCTAAAGAATGTTTTT 1686GCCACTTCTCTTCCCTTCATTCTTCGCCAGGCTCTCTGCTGACTCAAG 33981TTCTTCAGTTCACGATCTTCTAGTTGCAGCGATGAGTGCACGAGTGAGATCAAGATCCAGAGGAAGAGGAGATGGTCAGGAGGCTCCCGATGTGGTTGCATTCGTGGCTCCCGGTGAATCTCAGCA 5902CTTCAACTTGGCAACAGTTGCCTGGGGTAGCTCTACACAACTCTGTC 33982CAGCCCACAGCAATGATTCCAGAGGCCATGGGGAGTGGACAGCAGCTAGCTGACTGGAGGAATGCCCACTCTCATGGCAACCAGTACAGCACTATCATGCAGCAGCCATCCTTGCTGACTAACCATG 3399CACCCTGACCCAAGCCGAGACAGGTTCCAAACCTCAACCTGCAGCC 33983GGAAGGGGGAAGTGAAACTCGGCTGGGGGTGGGGGCTCAGAAGCCGCCCCAGAAAGCACTGAAAGCCACAGCACGTACACCCACTCCAGGGATCTGCCAGCACCCTGTGGGGCCCAGACTACAGGCTG 6560GGGACGCCATTGTGATTGGGGGGGGGATCCAGGGCTGCTTCACTGC 33984ATACCACCTGGCCAAACACAGGAAGAGGATCCTCCTGCTGGAGCAGTTCTTTCTACCACACTCCCGAGGAAGCTCCCATGGACAAAGCCGGATAATCCGAAAGGCGTACCTGGAAGACTTTTACACCC 2890CACCGTAGTGCTTAGAGGCCGAAAAAGTACAGCCCCTTCCGGGCTCC 33985GCGGTACGGGAAGACAGCTTTGGGATGTCGGAAGATCCTAGAGGTCCCAAGGTACCACGAAAGGCAGTGGTAGAAAAGCCAGCTCGGGCAGCAGAGCGAGAGGCCCGGGCCCTGCTGGAGAAGAACC 4343ATTGGCTGAGCCCGGCTGTCAGTCCTTTCGCGCCTCGGCGGCGCGGC 33986ATAGCCCGGCTCGGCCTGTAAAGCAGTCTCAAGCCTGCCGCAGGGAGAAGATGGCGGTCGCCGTGAGAACTTTGCAGGAACAGCTGGAAAAGGCCAAAGAGAGTCTTAAGAACGTGGATGAGAACAT 6138ACAAGGAGACTGGGAGGTGTCTCAAGTGCCTGTACCACACGGAAGG 33987GGAACACTGTCAGTTCTGCCGGTTTGGATACTATGGTGATGCCCTCCAGCAGGACTGTCGAAAGTGTGTCTGTAATTACCTGGGCACCGTGCAAGAGCACTGTAACGGCTCTGACTGCCAGTGCGACA 2241GAGGAAGGAGAGAGTGGAGGAGGAGGGCTTTGGGTTAGGGAGAGT 33988GCTTTCGTTTGTTTTAAATGGGAGAAACTGGAGCATGTTGCCAAGGGCAGAGAGCCAGCAGAGAGGGGTGAATGGAAGAAGGAGCGAGAAGGGGGTTACTGACGAAGCCTTATCCTGGAGGAGAGAAGG 5715CAAGTGGTCCTGTCGAAGTATTTATCACTGAGACTCCGAGTCAGCCC 33989AACTCCCACCCCATCCAGTGGAATGCACCACAGCCATCTCACATTTCCAAGTACATTCTCAGGTGGAGACCTAAAAATTCTGTAGGCCGTTGGAAGGAAGCTACCATACCAGGCCACTTAAACTCCT 3456CTAGACCAAAGGGTGCGGCTGCTGCAGAGGTGGCTGATGCAGGTTT 33990CCATCCTTGGGGAATGACCACGCAACTGGGCCCAGCCCTGGTGCTGGGGGTGGCCCTGTGCCTGGGTTGTGGCCAGCCCCTACCACAGGTCCCTGAACGCCCCTTCTCTGTGCTGTGGAATGTACCCT 5260ATCTCCAGCCATTGCTCCTCCAACAGAGACCATGGCTCCTCCAGTCA 33991GGGATCCTGTTCCTGGGAAACCCACGGTCACCATCCGGACTCGAGGCGCCATTATTCAAACCCCAACCCTAGGCCCCATCCAGCCTACTCGGGTGTCAGAAGCTGGCACCACAGTTCCTGGCCAGAT 1288GGAGGCAGGCGGTGCCGCGGCGCCGGGACCCGACTCATCCGGTGCT 33992TGCGTGTGGTGGTGAGCGCAGCGCCGAGGATGAGGAGGTGCAACAGCGGCTCCGGGCCGCCGCCGTCGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTGTGGCTGCTCGCGGTTCCCGGCGCTAACGCGGCCCCGCGGTCG 8756CACCCCCACCGACCTCTCGGAGACAGGAATCCGCTCTGCCCCTGCAT 33993CCTCCTCTGCTCACCCTTCTCTCAGTAGTGTTTGTCAGACACCAGTCCGGACCTCAGCTCTCGATCTAGTTCCCGAGTAAGATTTAGCTCCCGGGAAAGCGTGCCTGAAACAAGCCGGAGTGAGCCT 8952CCTGTACCATAACCAGGAGGCTGATGGTTGCTCAGGCCTCCCTCAAA 33994CTAGCCAATGAGAAGTGCACGGGTCCTGGTCGCCTAGGAAACCGCGTGACAACAAGATGGCGGCGCTGCGGGACGGCTAGCGGCCCTGCGTGGGAGTTCCTGACAGCTGGATTCTAGAAGTAGAACT 2759TTCCCCGGAAGTGTTGGTTAAAGCCCCTCCAATCAGCGGCTCGGTGC 33995GGCAAGTTTGAATTTCGTGGAGGCTCGGGTTGTGAGGGTTCCTGCTTCGGAGTCGGCGGTGGTCGTCCAGACCGAGTGTTCTTTACTTTTTGTTTGGTTGAGGTTTCACGCTAGAAGGTGGCTCAGG 1241CTGTCCATACACTCTCTCATCATCCTGTTCCTTGGATTGGACTTCACT 33996AAGCAATTTATCACTCACCTTCAGACTTACATGTGGGAGTTTTCACAACAGTAGTTTTGGAATCATTAGAACTTGGATTGATTTCATCATTTAACAGAAACAAACAGCCCAAATTACTTTATCACC 28013GAGCTCCAGCCTCCAGGCACCCGGGATCCAGCGCCGCCGCTCATAA 33997CACCCGCGACCCCGCAGCTAAGCGCAGCTCCCGACGCAATGGACCCGGCGCTGGCAGCCCAGATGAGCGAGGCTGTGGCCGAGAAGATGCTCCAGTACCGGCGGGACACAGCAGGCTGGAAGATTTGC 4681TGTTGACTCATGCAAATGAGGTATCTGAACTGCAGCTTCAGTATTAG 33998CAGAGCCACAGGCCGCCTCTGTGGCATCACCAGGGTTTCTCTGAAGAAGAGGGTCTGCATTTTCCTAAACCCAGTGCTGCTCTCCCATCTCCCATCTTCCTCTCGCAGCTTGATGAGCCCCGGTGTG 5602TGCCCCAGCCCTCAGGGCCGCCAGCAAGGAAGAAATTTGTGATACC 33999CCTCGACGAGGATGAGGTCCCTCCTGGAGTGGCCAAGCCCTTATTCCGATCTACACAGAGCCTTCCCACTGTGGACACCTCGGCCCAGGCGGCCCCTCAGACCTACGCCGAATATGCCATCTCACAGC 1945GAGAGGCCGGCGTCTCTCCCCCAGTTTGCCGTTCACCCGGAGCGCTC 34000GGGACTTGCCGATAGTGGTGACGGCGGCAACATGTCTGTGGCTTTCGCGGCCCCGAGGCAGCGAGGCAAGGGGGAGATCACTCCCGCTGCGATTCAGAAGATGTTGGATGACAATAACCATCTTATT 5229AACCCCAACCCTAGGCCCCATCCAGCCTACTCGGGTGTCAGAAGCTG 34001GCACCACAGTTCCTGGCCAGATTCGCCCAACGATGACCATTCCTGGCTATGTGGAGCCTACTGCAGTTGCTACCCCTCCCACAACCACCACCAAGAAGCCACGAGTATCCACACCAAAACCAGCAAC 7542CTGCAGCATCTTCTACGTCGGGACCACAGCCTCCGCCTCCACAAAGC 34002CTGAACCTCCTTTCGCAGGCTCAGCTGCAGGCACAGCCTCTTGCGCCAGGCGGAACTCAAATGAAAAAGAAAAGTGGCTTCCAGATAACTAGCGTTACTCCTGCTCAGATCTCCGCTAGTATCAGCT 6866CCAATACCTGGGATCCATTGCCTCTCCTTCTGTGCACCCAGCAACGC 34003CCATTTCACCTGGACGTGCCAGCGGCATGACAACCCTCTCTGCAGAACTTTCCAGTCGACTCTCAACGGCACCCGACCTGACAGCGTTCAGCGACCCGCGCCAGTTCCCCGCGCTGCCCTCCATCTC 1849TCTCTTGCTTCAACAGTGTTTGGACGGAACAGATCCGGGGACTCTCT 34004TCCAGCCTCCGACCGCCCTCCGATTTCCTCTCCGCTTGCAACCTCCGGGACCATCTTCTCGGCCATCTCCTGCTTCTGGGACCTGCCAGCACCGTTTTTGTGGTTAGCTCCTTCTTGCCAACCAACC 2558AGTTACCTCTCCCCTTTCACGTAGTTTTCATTTGTGGTGAGATTCTCT 34005CCCAGGCCACAAGACATTTCCTGCTCGGAACCTTGTTTACTAATTTCCACTGCTTTTAAGGCCCTGCACTGAAAATGCAAGCTCAGGCGCCGGTGGTCGTTGTGACCCAACCTGGAGTCGGTCCCG 2109ATCAGCCCAAAGGTAGGCTCAGGCTCCGACGGTGGCCGGCGGGGGT 34006CACGAGGCTTCGTAGTGGAGGAACGGGTTTGGCGTGTGGGACGCAGCTGCCTCTGTACTGGGGAGTCACGGAGTGGCCGGGCTCCAGGGACATGGCGGCGGCCTCTGCGGTGTCGGTGCTGCTGGTGG 297ATCCGGAGGCAGCCTGCAGGAAGCCGTAGCGCCGGTACGTGCCCCT 34007CTCCTGTCTGGAGGCGGGTGTAGAAGTCCGACCGCGGAAGCCAGACTGCTGTCCAGTCGGCGAGCGCGTACCATTCAGCATCGGCTCCGCCCGAGTCCCACCTTCCTCAGGCTCTGATTGGCTGACAC 2621CAACAGAAGCCAAGAAGGAAGCCGTCTATCTTGTGGCGATCATGTA 34008TAAGCTGGCCTCCTGCTGTTTGCTTTTCATAGGATTCTTAAATCCTCTCTTATCTCTTCCTCTCCTTGACTCCAGGGAAATATCCTTTCAACTCTCAGCACCTCATGAAGACGCGCGCTTAACTCCGG 6574TGGCTGACACATTCCTGGAGCACATGTGCCGCCTGGACATTGATTCA 34009CCACCCATCACAGCCCGGAACACTGGCATCATCTGTACCATTGGCCCAGCTTCCCGATCAGTGGAGCTGAAGAAGGGAGCCACTCTCAAAATCACGCTGGATAACGCCTACATGGAAAAGTGTGACG 1033GACATTTACATCCTGCCCAGCGACAACTCTGGACAAGTCAGTCCCCC 34010AGAGTCTCCAACTGTGACCACTTCCTGGCAGTCTGAGAGCTTACCTGTGTCACTGTCAGCTAGCCAGAGTTGGCACACAGAAAGCCTGCCAGTGTCACTAGGCCCTGAGTCCTGGCAGCAGATTGCA 8789CCTCTGACTTGACCCAATGAAAGAAGCATATGGCACTTGTGAAGATA 34011AATGTTACTCCTCCCTTTTTAATTGGAACTTCTGCTTAGGACCTGTGTATGACGTTTCACCTGTGATCTGTTCTTTCGGTAGCCACTGACTTTGAGTTACAGGAAGGTCTCCGAAGATTTGTGTCAA 6392CTTCCCTGAGGAGGACGACCCCACCAACTGGCTGCGTTGCTACTACT 34012ACGAAGACACCATCAGCACCATCAAGTCTGTGGCCTGGGAGGGAGGGGCCTGTCCAGCCTTCCTGCCATCCCTACGACCACTGCCCCTCACATCACCTTCTCATGGGTCCCTCTCCCACTCCAAAGC 6885ATTTATGATTTCAACATGGATACATATTTCAGTTCTTTCTTTTTCTCAC 34013TATCTGAAAATACATTTCCCTCCCTCTCTTCCCCCCAATATCTCCCTTTTTTTCTCTCTTCCTCTATCTTCCAAACCCCACTTTCTCCCTCCTCCTTTTCCTGTGTTCTCTTAAGCAGATAGCAC 561CCCTTCCGGCTGGCCCCGCTCAGTCACCCGCAGCAGGCGTGCAGTTT 34014CCCGGCTCTCCGCGCGGCCGGGGAAGGTCAGCGCCGTAATGGCGTTCTTGGCGTCGGGACCCTACCTGACCCATCAGCAAAAGGTGTTGCGGCTTTATAAGCGGGCGCTACGCCACCTCGAGTCGTG 7556ATACAAATTTGCCTTTGGCACAACAGATACCACTAAGTTCTACCCAG 34015TTCTCCGCACAATCATTAGCTCAGGCAATTGGAAGCCAAATTGAAGATGCCAGGCGTGCAGCGGAGCCCTCCTTAGTTGGCTTACCTCAGACTATCAGTGGTGACAGTGGGGGAATGTCAGCAGTTT 8800TCCGTCCTCCAGGATCTGGGGAGAAAGAGCCCCATCCCTTCTCTCTC 34016TGCCACCATTTCGGACACCCCGCAGGGACTCGTTTTGGGATTCGCACTGACTTCAAGGAAGGACGCGAACCCTTCTCTGACCCCAGCTCGGGCGGCCACCTGTCTTTGCCGCGGTGACCCTTCTCTC 5781GTTTACTTCCCCTGCCAGCATTGGGGTGCTCTCTAAGCAACAGTAGG 34017CGGAGAGTGGTCTGGCGTATTAAAAACAAAGGATCGTCAAGTGGGCCTTCCCAGGCATTGCTTTGACTTAGTACATGTAGAGGATGTGGCAGTTCTCTCCGTCCCTGCCACTGCTGGTTTCTTTGTT 2930TATTTTAAGCCCAGTCTTCCCTGGGCCACCTTTAGCAGATCCTCGTGC 34018GCCCCCGCCCCCTGGCCGTGAAACTCAGCCTCTATCCAGCAGCGACGACAAGTAAAGTGGCCCGCCGGTTTCTGAGCCTTCTGCCCTGCGGGGACACGGTCTGCACCCTGCCCGCGGCCACGGACC 3426CCAGCGGAAGTAATTCTTTCGACTGCCCCGGAACCCACCGGAGCAG 34019GCAGCTGGGGGTGGGGGGGCGGCCCTGGGATAGGGGCTGTGGCAGTACGCGGGGACCCGGCTGCGGTGGCTGCGGGACTGACGAATGGAGAGGAGAAAACCTATGGTGGCTGTGAAGGACCTGATGCC 5800ATGGGGAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGTATTGGGC 34020GCCTGGTCACCAGGGCTGCTTTTAACTCTGGTAAAGTGGATATTGTTGCCATCAATGACCCCTTCATTGACCTCAACTACATGGTTTACATGTTCCAATATGATTCCACCCATGGCAAATTCCATGGC 27433CTGCCTCCCCCCCGCTCCCGCTCCCCTGAGCCCAGCCAGACCCCGCG 34021CCGCCCGCGCCCCGCTCGACTCCGGAGGCTCCCGCAGCCCCGGCGTCCGCCCCGCTGCCCCCTCCCCCGGGGGCCATGGGGGCGCCCCCGGGCTACCGGCCCTCAGCTTGGGTGCATCTCCTCCACC 424ATTTCTGGGAAGCAGTCGATATTATCTGTACGCCTAGAACAGTGCCC 34022TCTGCAGCTGAATAACCCTTTTAACGAGTATTCCAAATTTGATGGCAAGGGTCATGTAGGTACAACAGCAACCAAGAAGATCGATGTCTACCTCCCTCTGCACTCGAGCCAGGACAGACTGCTGCCA 28259CTCTGGTGATACAGAAGAAAAGACAGTCTCCATTTTCAAACAGTCCC 34023TCCTGGGAGAACACAGACAGGCAGAGGATTACAACACAAGGCAGCAAGCACTGGGAGACGAAAGTTTTGGCATCTGTTCCCTGGCTGTGCCAAGATGGGCGATTGGAGCTTCCTGGGAAATTTCCTG 6972GTCTACTATGTCTGAACTGTGGTTTCTTGTTTATCCTTTTTTCCTTAGT 34024TGGACTGTAATGTATGGTCTGTCAACCTGTGAATCTTTAAAGTATGATTCAGGTATTGTTGTATTCTTTACTGTGTAATAAAAAAGTTGAAAAAAATCTGGATCCTCTGTCTCCCTCGTCCCCGG 417TTTCGTGACCTTGTCCAGTAGAAGGCTATTTAATTTTCACAACTGCTT 34025GAATTTTGACATACAAGATGAAGCAAGATGCCTCAAGAAATGCTGCCTACACTGTGGATTGTGAAGATTATGTGCATGTGGTAGAATTTAATCCCTTTGAGAATGGGGATTCAGGAAACCTAATTG 8182TGTCTGCACCAGCCGGCCTCCAGCCTGGCTGGACCCTGCTGCCTGTG 34026TGGCCCGGAGCCAGAGGCCCCCACACTCCCAGCTGCTCTTCTACAGATGCCATCAACGAGCAGGACTCTGGGTGGCTCCACTGTCTAAGGGCTCTGCGAGTGACCCGGGGGCGAGCTCCGTGCTGC 7572CTTACGTAGTAATTACATTTCCTTGAAAAAACTATAGTGAATAGAAA 34027TCCCTAGCCATTTCATTTTTTATGTTTTTAATGAAGATCTTTAAAATACCATAGGTGGTAATCGTGGAAAATTTGAAAAATCTCATGTCAGTGTATTAAGATGGTGGAGAAGTTTTTTTCTCCATTA 1415ATTCATGAAAATCCACTACTCCAGACAGACGGCTTTGGAATCCACCA 34028GCTACATCCAGCTCCCTGAGGCAGAGTTGAGAATGGAGAGAATGTTACCTCTCCTGGCTCTGGGGCTCTTGGCGGCTGGGTTCTGCCCTGCTGTCCTCTGCCACCCTAACAGCCCACTTGACGAGGA 7327GAGCTTCCAGGGATATTTGAGGCACCATCCCTGCCATTGCCGGGCAC 34029TCGCGGCGCTGCTAACGGCCTGGTCACATGCTCTCCGGAGAGCTACGGGAGGGCGCTGGGTAACCTCTATCCGAGCCGCGGCCGCGAGGAGGAGGGAAAAGGCGAGCAAAAAGGAAGAGTGGGAGGA 705GCCCCCTCCCCTGACTATCAAAGCAGCGGCCGGCTGTTGGGGTCCAC 34030CACGCCTTCCACCTGCCCCACTGCTTCTTCGCTTCTCTCTTGGAAAGTCCAGTCTCTCCTCGGCTTGCAATGGACCCCAACTGCTCCTGCGCCGCTGGTGTCTCCTGCACCTGCGCTGGTTCCTGCA 8561AGTCGCATAGTGGTTTTTCCGCTCGCGTCGCTGTGTGAAAGTTGGCT 34031CGCCGCTCTTTGCACGCCCTCCCTGGAGGCCGACCCGAGACGCCAAGCTGGAGAGACCGTGCCTCCCCGAGGCCGGCCGCCCCGCGAGCACAGCCTCCGCCCCCGTTGCACTGCCGGGCTGGGCAAT 1679GGTGGCGGGAAGAGGAGGCGCGAGAATGGAGGTGGAGGCCGTCTG 34032TGGTGGCGCGGGCGAGGTGGAGGCCCAGGACTCTGACCCTGCCCCTGCCTTCAGCAAGGCCCCCGGCAGCGCCGGCCACTACGAACTGCCGTGGGTTGAAAAATATAGGCCAGTAAAGCTGAATGAAAT 5635TATTTCCCTCTACTGAGTAAACCCTATCTGTGATTCCCCCAAACATCT 34033GGCATGGCTCCCTTTTGTCCTTCCTGTGCCCTGCAAATATTAGCAAAGAAGCTTCATGCCAGGTTAGGAAGGCAGCATTCCATGACCAGAAACAGGGACAAAGAAATCCCCCCTTCAGAACAGAGG 5583TGTTACTTAAGAATGCTTTCCAGGTGGAAAGTTCCTTAAGTTTGAGG 34034CTTCAAATTCCATACAGCACATTAAAATCCCATTCATGAGTTTGAAATACTGCTCTGTTGTCTTGGAAATACCAATCAGATTGTTGGCTGAAGTGATGTGGATAAAGAAGGGATCTTAGAAAAACTA 9027ACGAAGTTCCGGAAATGGAATTACCGAGTCAGATGAGAAACACAAG 34035TCATCAATGAATTAACAAGCAACACATTGTCACATCCAGCTGTTGAAGAGTGGTTAACTCAGCTTGATCTCCGAAGACTCTTCTGCACCCCACCCCGCCCCCAACTGCTTTCCAAAGAGAAACAGAAA

The IRES may be of any length or size. For example, the IRES may beabout 100 nucleotides to about 600 nucleotides in length (e.g., about200, about 225, about 250, about 275, about 300, about 325, about 350,about 375, about 400, about 425, about 450, about 475, about 500, about525, about 550, or about 575 nucleotides in length, or a range definedby any two of the foregoing values). In some embodiments, the IRES maybe about 200 nucleotides to about 800 nucleotides in length (about 200,about 210, about 220, about 240, about 260, about 280, about 320, about340, about 360, about 380, about 420, about 440, about 460, about 480,about 500, about 520, about 540, about 560, about 580, about 600, about620, about 640, about 660, about 680, about 700, about 720, about 740,about 760, about 780, or about 800 nucleotides in length, or a rangedefined by any two of the foregoing values). In some embodiments, theIRES may be about 200 to about 400, about 400 to about 600, about 600 toabout 700, or about 600 to about 800 nucleotides in length. In someembodiments, the IRES is about 210 nucleotides in length. In someembodiments, the IRES may be about 100 to about 3000 nucleotides inlength.

In some embodiments, a circular RNA molecule comprises of an IRESsequence that consists of a sequence encoded by a DNA sequence of anyone of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201. In some embodiments, acircular RNA molecule comprises an IRES sequence encoded by a DNAsequence of any one of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201, whereinthe IRES sequence additionally comprises up to 1000 additionalnucleotides. In some embodiments, the IRES sequence is encoded by asequence of any one of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201andadditionally comprises up to 1000 additional nucleotides located at the5′ end of that sequence. In some embodiments, the IRES sequence isencoded by a sequence of any one of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO:229-17201and additionally comprises up to 1000 additional nucleotideslocated at the 3′ end of that sequence. In some embodiments, the IRESsequence is encoded by a sequence of any one of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQID NO: 229-17201and additionally comprises up to 1000 additionalnucleotides located at the 5′ end of that sequence and up to 1000additional nucleotides located at the 5′ end of that sequence.

In some embodiments, a circular RNA molecule comprises an internalribosome entry site (IRES) sequence region, wherein the IRES sequenceregion comprises a sequence encoded by a DNA sequence of any one of SEQID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201, and wherein the sequence encodedby a DNA sequence of any one of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9 kJ/mol and a meltingtemperature of at least 35.0° C.

In some embodiments, a circular RNA molecule comprises an internalribosome entry site (IRES) sequence region, wherein the IRES sequenceregion comprises a sequence encoded by a DNA sequence of any one of SEQID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201, and wherein the IRES sequenceregion has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9 kJ/mol and amelting temperature of at least 35.0° C., over its entire length.

In some embodiments, a circular RNA molecule comprises an internalribosome entry site (IRES) sequence region, wherein the IRES sequenceregion comprises a sequence encoded by a DNA sequence of any one of SEQID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201, and additionally comprises up to1000 additional nucleotides located at the 5′ end of and up to 1000additional nucleotides located at the 5′ end, and wherein the IRESsequence region has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9kJ/mol and a melting temperature of at least 35.0° C., over its entirelength.

In some embodiments, the recombinant circular RNA molecule comprises aprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence operably linked to the IRES in anon-native configuration. Any protein or polypeptide of interest (e.g.,a peptide, polypeptide, protein fragment, protein complex, fusionprotein, recombinant protein, phosphoprotein, glycoprotein, orlipoprotein) may be encoded by the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence.In some embodiments, the protein coding-nucleic acid sequence encodes atherapeutic protein. Examples of suitable therapeutic proteins includecytokines, toxins, tumor suppressor proteins, growth factors, hormones,receptors, mitogens, immunoglobulins, neuropeptides, neurotransmitters,and enzymes. Alternatively, the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence canencode an antigen of a pathogen (e.g., a bacterium, virus, fungus,protist, or parasite), and the circRNA can be used as, or as onecomponent of, a vaccine. Therapeutic proteins, and examples thereof, arefurther described in, e.g., Dimitrov, D.S., Methods Mol Biol., 899: 1-26(2012); and Lagasse et al., F1000Research, 6: 113 (2017).

Ideally, the IRES is “in-frame” with respect to the protein-codingnucleic acid sequence, that is, the IRES is positioned in the circRNAmolecule in the correct reading frame for the encoded protein. Examplesof IRES elements that were found to be in-frame with one or more codingsequences are set forth in SEQ ID NO: 28984-32953. In some embodiments,however, the IRES may be “out of frame” with respect to theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence, such that the position of the IRESdisrupts the ORF of the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence. In otherembodiments, the IRES may overlap with one or more ORFs of theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence. In addition, while in someembodiments the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence comprises at leastone stop codon, in other embodiments the protein-coding nucleic acidsequence may lack a stop codon. The instant inventors have found that acircRNA molecule comprising a protein-coding nucleic acid sequencehaving an in frame non-native IRES and lacking a stop codon can initiatea recursive (i.e., infinite loop) translation mechanism. Such recursivetranslation may produce a concatenated protein multimer (e.g., >200kDa). This particular circRNA design allows for the production ofrepeating ORF units up to 10 times the size of the single ORF. Withoutbeing bound to any particular theory, use of the circRNAs describedherein for recursive gene encoding may represent a novel “datacompression” algorithm for genes, addressing the gene size limitationassociated with many current gene therapy applications.

In some embodiments, the IRES comprises (i) at least one RNA secondarystructure element and (ii) a sequence that is complementary to an 18SrRNA. In some embodiments, the IRES comprises (i) at least one RNAsecondary structure element and (ii) a sequence that is complementary toan 18S rRNA, wherein the RNA secondary structure of the IRES is formedfrom the nucleotides at about position 40 to about position 60 of theIRES, wherein the first nucleic acid at the 5′ end of the IRES isconsidered to be position 1. The relative location of the at least oneRNA secondary structure and the sequence that is complementary to an 18SRNA may vary. For example, in some embodiments, the IRES comprises (i)at least one RNA secondary structure element and (ii) a sequence that iscomplementary to an 18S rRNA, and wherein the at least one RNA secondarystructure is located 5′ to the sequence that is complementary to an 18SrRNA (See FIG. 4K). In some embodiments, the IRES comprises (i) at leastone RNA secondary structure element and (ii) a sequence that iscomplementary to an 18S rRNA, and wherein the at least one RNA secondarystructure element is located 3′ to the sequence that is complementary toan 18S rRNA (See FIG. 19B).

DNA Molecules, Vectors, and Cells

In some embodiments, the disclosure provides a DNA molecule comprising anucleic acid sequence encoding any one of the recombinant circRNAmolecules disclosed herein. Accordingly, described herein are DNAsequences that may be used to encode circular RNAs. In some embodiments,a DNA sequence encodes a circular RNA comprising an IRES. In someembodiments, a DNA sequence encodes a circular RNA comprising aprotein-coding nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the DNA sequenceencodes a circular RNA molecule; wherein the circular RNA moleculecomprises a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence and an internalribosome entry site (IRES) operably linked to the protein-coding nucleicacid sequence in a non-native configuration. In some embodiments, theDNA sequence encodes a protein coding-nucleic acid sequence, wherein theprotein is a therapeutic protein.

The DNA sequences disclosed herein may, in some embodiments, comprise atleast one non-coding functional sequence. For example, the non-codingfunctional sequence may be a microRNA (miRNA) sponge. A microRNA spongemay comprise a complementary binding site to a miRNA of interest. Insome embodiments, a sponge's binding sites are specific to the miRNAseed region, which allows them to block a whole family of relatedmiRNAs. In some embodiments, the miRNA sponge is selected from any oneof the miRNA sponges shown in Table 3, below.

TABLE 3 miRNA sponges miRNA Binding sites Cell context 92, empty fourbulged sites rat cerebellar neuronal cultures miR-155, empty eightbulged sites B cell lymphoma cell line 15a, empty two perfect siteshuman prostate cell lines, xenograft 113, empty two perfect sites mousecardiac myocytes, heart 326, empty seven bulged sites tail veininjection, TH cells 16, 20, 21 four to nine bulged sites mammalian celllines 30-5p, CXCR4 16, 20, CXCR4 four to nine bulged sites mammaliancell lines let-7, 22, 124, 125, five to seven bulged sties rathippocampal neuronal cultures 132, 143, empty 183, CXCR4 seven bulgedsites HEK293T cell line A.t. 156, 319, one bulged site transgenicArabidopsis plants empty 16, CXCR4 seven to nine human multiple myelomacell bulged sites lines, xenograft 16, 23a, 142-3p. four perfect or fourU937 cell line, mouse hematopoietic 221, 223 bulged sitesstem/progenitor cells, transplant nonspecific KSHV miR-K1, nine bulgedsites BC-3 B cell lymphoma cell line CXCR4, empty 21, 140-3p, one to twoperfect sites mammalian cell lines 140-5p, empty 133, empty threeperfect sites mouse cardiac myocytes adipogenic differentiation 204,211, empty two perfect sites ST2 cell line, osteogenic and adipogenicdifferentiation 96/182/183, empty four bulged sites each mouse retinalet-7, 16, empty six to nine bulged sites lung cancer cell line D.m. 7,8, 9a, 276a 10 bulged sites Transgenic fruitflies 9, 10b, CXCR4 eightbulged sites 4T1 breast cancer cell line, xenograft herpesvirusmiR-K12-7, six bulged sites human B cell lines K12-8, BARTI-5p, BART4,empty 144, 451, empty four perfect sites mouse hematopoieticstem/progenitor cells, transplant let-7, 29, 125, 16 bulged sites neuralstem cells let-7/125. 128, empty 21, empty two perfect sites mousecardiocytes 18a, 19b, 20a, one perfect site K562 cell line nonspecific145/146, empty eight to nine bulged mouse hematopoietic stem/progenitorcells, sites each transplant 31, CXCR4 seven bulged sites MCF7-Rasbreast cancer cell line, xenograft

In some embodiments, the non-coding sequence may be an RNA bindingprotein site. RNA binding proteins and binding sites therefore arelisted in numerous databases known to those of skill in the art,including RBPDB (rbpdb.ccbr.utoronto.ca). In some embodiments, the RNAbinding protein comprises one or more RNA-binding domains, selected fromRNA-binding domain (RBD, also known as RNP domain and RNA recognitionmotif, RRM), K-homology (KH) domain (type I and type II), RGG(Arg-Gly-Gly) box, Sm domain; DEAD/DEAH box (SEQ ID NOs: 34036 and34037), zinc finger (ZnF, mostly C-x8-X-x5-X-x3-H (SEQ ID NO: 34038)),double stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD), cold-shock domain;Pumilio/FBF (PUF or Pum-HD) domain, and the Piwi/Argonaute/Zwille (PAZ)domain.

In some embodiments, the DNA sequence comprises an aptamer. Aptamers areshort, single-stranded DNA molecules that can selectively bind to aspecific target. The target may be, for example, a protein, peptide,carbohydrate, small molecule, toxin, or a live cell. Some aptamers canbind DNA, RNA, self-aptamers or other non-self aptamers. Aptamers assumea variety of shapes due to their tendency to form helices andsingle-stranded loops. Illustrative DNA and RNA aptamers are listed inthe Aptamer database(scicrunch.org/resources/Any/record/nlx_144509-1/SCR001781/resolver?q=*&1=).

In some embodiments, the DNA sequence encodes a circular RNA moleculethat comprises between about 200 nucleotides and about 10,000nucleotides.

In some embodiments, the DNA sequence encodes a circular RNA moleculethat comprises a spacer between the IRES and a start codon of theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence. The spacer may be of any length.For example, in some embodiments, the length of the spacer is selectedto optimize translation of the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence.

In some embodiments, the DNA sequence encodes a circular RNA moleculecomprising an IRES that is configured to promote rolling circletranslation. In some embodiments, the DNA sequence encodes a circularRNA comprising a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence that lacks a stopcodon. In some embodiments, the DNA sequence encodes a circular RNAmolecule comprising (i) an IRES that is configured to promote rollingcircle translation, and (ii) a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence thatlacks a stop codon.

The DNA sequences described herein may be comprised in one or morevectors. For example, in some embodiments, a viral vector comprises aDNA sequence encoding a circular RNA. The viral vector may be, forexample, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector, an adenovirus vector, aretrovirus vector, a lentivirus vector, a vaccinia or a herpesvirusvector.

In some embodiments, the viral vector is an AAV. As used herein, theterm “adeno-associated virus” (ANY), includes but is not limited to,AAV1., AAV2, AAV3 (including types 3 A and 3B), AAV4, AAV5, AAV6, AAV7,AAV8, AAV9, AAV10, AAV11, AAV12, avian AAV, bovine AAV, canine AAV,equine AAV, ovine AAV, and any other AAV now known or later discovered.in some embodiments, the AAV vector may be a modified form (i.e., a formcomprising one or more amino acid modifications relative thereto) of oneor more of AAV1., AAV2, AAV3 (including types 3 A and 3B), AAV4, AAV5,AAV6, AAV7, AAV8, AAV9, AAV10 AAV11, AAV12, avian AAV; bovine AAV,canine AAV, equine AAV, or ovine AAV. Various AAV serotypes and variantsthereof are described, e.g., BERNARD N. FIELDS et al, VIROLOGY, volume2, chapter 69 (4th ed., Lippincott-Raven Publishers). A number ofrelatively new AAV serotypes and chides have been identified (see, e.g.,Gao et al. (2004) J Virology 7S:638I-6388; Moris et al. (2004) Virology33-:375-383). The genomic sequences of various serotypes of AAV, as wellas the sequences of the native terminal repeats (TRs), Rep proteins, andcapsid subunits are known in the art. Such sequences may be found in theliterature or in public databases such as the GenBank® Database. See,e.g., GenBank Accession Numbers NC 044927, NC_002077, NC_001401,NC_001729, NC_001863, NC_001829, NC_001862, NC_000883, NC_001701,NC_001510, NC_006152, NC_006261, AF063497, U89790, AF043303, AF028705,AF028704, J02275, JO 1901, J02275, X01457, AF288061, AH009962, AY028226,AY028223, NC_001358, NC_001540, AF513851, AF513852, AY530579; thedisclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein for teachingparvovirus and AAV nucleic acid and amino acid sequences. See also,e.g., Srivistava et al. (1983) J Virology 45:555; Chiorini et al. (1998)J. Virology 71:6823; Chiorini et al (1999) J Virology 73:1309;Bantel-Schaal et al. (1999) J. Virology 73:939; Xiao et al. (1999) J.Virology 73:3994; Muramatsu et al. (1996) Virology 221:208; Shade et al.(1986) J Virol. 58:921; Gao et al. (2002) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1 1854; Moris et al. (2004) Virology 33-:375-383; international patentpublications WO 00/28061, WO 99/61601, WO 98/11244; and U.S. Pat. No.6,156,303; the disclosures of which are incorporated by referenceherein.

In some embodiments, a DNA sequence described herein is comprised in anAAV2 vector, or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, a DNA sequencedescribed herein is comprised an AAV4 vector, or a variant thereof. Insome embodiments, a DNA sequence described herein is comprised in anAAV8 vector, or a variant thereof. In some embodiments, a DNA sequencedescribed herein is comprised in an AAV9 vector, or a variant thereof.

In some embodiments, a DNA sequence described herein is comprised in aviral-like particle (VLP). Viral like particles are molecules thatclosely resemble viruses, but are non infectious because they containlittle or no viral genetic material. They can be naturally occurring orsynthesized through the individual expression of viral structuralproteins, which can then self-assemble into a virus-lie structure.Combinations of structural capsid proteins from different viruses can beused to create VLPs. For example VLPs may be derived from the, AAVs,retrovirus, Flaviviridae, paramyoxoviridae, or bacteriophages. VLPs canbe produced in multiple cell culture systems, including bacteria,mammalian cell lines, insect cell lines, yeast and plant cells.

In some embodiments, a DNA sequence described herein is comprised in anon-viral vector. The non-viral vector may be, for example, a plasmidcomprises the DNA sequence. In some embodiments, the non-viral vector isa closed-ended DNA. A closed-ended DNA is a non-viral, capsid-free DNAvector with covalently closed ends (see, e.g., WO2019/169233). In someembodiments, a mini-intronic plasmid vector comprises a DNA sequencedescribed herein. Mini-intronic plasmids are expression systems thatcontain a bacterial replication origin and selectable marker maintainingthe juxtaposition of the 5′ and the 3′ ends of transgene expressioncassette as in a minicircle (see, e.g., Lu, J., et al., Mol Ther (2013)21(5) 954-963).

In some embodiments, a DNA sequence described herein is comprised in alipid nanoparticle. Lipid nanoparticles (or LNPs) are submicron-sizedlipid emulsions, and may offer one or more of the following advantages:(i) control and/or targeted drug release, (ii) high stability, (iii)biodegradability of the lipids used, (iv) avoid organic solvents, (v)easy to scale-up and sterilize, (vi) less expensive thanpolymeric/surfactant based carriers, (vii) easier to validate and gainregulatory approval. In some embodiments, the lipid nanoparticles rangein diameter between about 10 and about 1000 nm.

In some embodiments, a DNA sequence encodes a circular RNA molecule,wherein the circular RNA molecule comprises a protein-coding nucleicacid sequence and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) operably linkedto the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence in a non nativeconfiguration wherein the IRES comprises: at least one RNA secondarystructure; and a sequence that is complementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA(rRNA).

In some embodiments, a DNA sequence encodes a circular RNA molecule,wherein the circular RNA molecule comprises a protein-coding nucleicacid sequence and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) operably linkedto the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence in a non nativeconfiguration wherein the IRES comprises: at least one RNA secondarystructure element; and a sequence that is complementary to an 18Sribosomal RNA (rRNA); wherein the IRES has a minimum free energy (MFE)of less than −18.9 kJ/mol and a melting temperature of at least 35.0°C.; and wherein the RNA secondary structure element is formed from thenucleotides at about position 40 to about position 60 of the IRES,wherein the first nucleic acid at the 5′ end of the IRES is consideredto be position 1.

In some embodiments, a DNA sequence comprises a nucleic acid sequenceencoding a circular RNA molecule; wherein the circular RNA moleculecomprises a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence and an internalribosome entry site (IRES) operably linked to the protein-coding nucleicacid sequence in a non-native configuration; wherein the IRES is encodedby any one of the nucleic acid sequences listed of SEQ ID NO: 1-228 orSEQ ID NO: 229-17201, or a nucleic acid sequence that is at least 90% orat least 95% identical thereto.

Also provided herein are cells comprising a recombinant circRNAmolecule, a DNA molecule, or a vector described herein. Any prokaryoticor eukaryotic cell that can be contacted with and stably maintain therecombinant circRNA molecule, DNA molecule encoding the recombinantcircRNA molecule, or vector comprising the recombinant circRNA moleculemay be used in the context of the present disclosure. Examples ofprokaryotic cells include, but are not limited to, cells from the generaBacillus (such as Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus brevis), Escherichia(such as E. coli), Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, Salmonella, and Envinia.In some embodiments, the host cell is a eukaryotic cell. Suitableeukaryotic cells are known in the art and include, for example, yeastcells, insect cells, and mammalian cells. Examples of yeast cellsinclude those from the genera Hansenula, Kluyveromyces, Pichia,Rhinosporidium, Saccharomyces, and Schizosaccharomyces. Suitable insectcells include Sf-9 and HIS cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and aredescribed in, for example, Kitts et al., Biotechniques, 14: 810-817(1993); Lucklow, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 4: 564-572 (1993); and Lucklowet al., J. Virol., 67: 4566-4579 (1993).

In some embodiments, the cell is a mammalian cell. A number of mammaliancells are known in the art, many of which are available from theAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Va.). Examples ofmammalian cells include, but are not limited to, HeLa cells, HepG2cells, Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) (e.g., ATCC No. CCL61), CHODHFR-cells (Urlaub et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 4216-4220(1980)), human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 or 293T cells (e.g., ATCC No.CRL1573), and 3T3 cells (e.g., ATCC No. CCL92). Other mammalian celllines are the monkey COS-1 (e.g., ATCC No. CRL1650) and COS-7 cell lines(e.g., ATCC No. CRL1651), as well as the CV-1 cell line (e.g., ATCC No.CCL70). Further exemplary mammalian host cells include primate celllines and rodent cell lines, including transformed cell lines. Normaldiploid cells, cell strains derived from in vitro culture of primarytissue, as well as primary explants also are suitable. Other mammaliancell lines include, but are not limited to, mouse neuroblastoma N2Acells, HeLa, mouse L-929 cells, and BHK or HaK hamster cell lines, allof which are available from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC;Manassas, VA). Methods for selecting mammalian cells and methods fortransformation, culture, amplification, screening, and purification ofsuch cells are well known in the art (see, e.g., Ausubel et al., supra).In some embodiments, the mammalian cell is a human cell.

Method of Producing a Protein

The disclosure further provides a method of producing a protein in acell, which comprises contacting a cell with the above-describedrecombinant circular RNA molecule, the above-described DNA moleculecomprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding the recombinant circRNAmolecule, or a vector comprising the recombinant circRNA molecule underconditions whereby the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence istranslated and the protein is produced in the cell.

In some embodiments, a method of producing a protein in a cell comprisescontacting a cell with a DNA sequence described herein, or a vectorcomprising the DNA sequence, under conditions whereby the protein-codingnucleic acid sequence is translated and the protein is produced in thecell. Also provided is a protein produced by the disclosed methods.

In some embodiments, production of the protein is tissue-specific. Forexample, the protein may be selectively produced in one or more of thefollowing tissues: muscle, liver, kidney, brain, lung, skin, pancreas,blood, or heart.

In some embodiments, the protein is expressed recursively in the cell.

In some embodiments, the half-life of the circular RNA in the cell isabout 1 to about 7 days. For example, the half-life of the circular RNAmay be about 1, about 2, about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, ormore days.

In some embodiments, the protein is produced in the cell for at leastabout 10%, at least about 20%, or at least about 30% longer than if theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence is provided to the cell using aviral vector encoding a linear RNA or as a linear RNA.

In some embodiments, the protein is produced in the cell at a level thatis at least about 10%, at least about 20%, or at least about 30% higherthan if the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence is provided to the cellusing a viral vector or as a linear RNA.

Use of the IRES sequences described herein to express a protein from acircular RNA may, in some embodiments, allow for continued expression ofa protein from the circular RNA in a cell even under stress conditions.In response to one or more stress conditions, production of proteinsfrom linear RNA is often suppressed. Accordingly, in some embodiments,circRNA can be used as an alternative for production of proteins fromlinear RNAs during stress conditions. In some embodiments, a proteinexpressed from a circular RNA in a cell is expressed under one or morestress conditions. In some embodiments, expression of a protein from acircular RNA in a cell is not substantially disrupted when the cell isexposed to one or more stress conditions. For example, exposure of thecell to one or more stress conditions may change expression of a proteinfrom a circular RNA by less than 15%, less than 10%, less than 5%, lessthan 3%, less than 1%, or less than 0.5%. In some embodiments, a proteinexpressed from a circular RNA is expressed at a level under one or morestress conditions that is substantially the same as the level expressedin the same cell in the absence of the one or more stress conditions. Insome embodiments, the level of expression of a protein from a circularRNA in a cell is at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, or atleast about 99%, relative to the level of expression in the absence ofthe one or more stress conditions. A non-limiting list of conditionswhich may cause cellular stress include changes in temperature(including exposure to extreme temperatures and/or heat shock), exposureto toxins (including viral or bacterial toxins, heavy metals, etc.),exposure to electromagnetic radiation, mechanical damage, viralinfection, etc.

In some embodiments, the circRNAs described herein (including componentsthereof, such as the IRES sequences) facilitate cap-independenttranslation activity from the circRNA. Canonical translation via acap-independent mechanism may be reduced in some human diseases.Accordingly, the use of circRNAs to express proteins may be particularlyhelpful for treating such diseases. In some embodiments, use of thecircRNAs described herein facilitates cap-independent translationactivity from the circRNA under conditions wherein cap-dependenttranslation is reduced or turned-off in a cell.

As discussed above, translation of the protein-coding nucleic acidsequence may occur in an infinite loop (i.e., recursively) when the IRESis in-frame with the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence and theprotein-coding sequence lacks a stop codon. Thus, in some embodiments,the method of producing a protein in a cell produces a concatenatedprotein.

Any prokaryotic or eukaryotic host cell described herein may becontacted with the recombinant circRNA molecule or a vector comprisingthe circRNA molecule. The host cell may be a mammalian cell, such as ahuman cell. In some embodiments, the cell is in vivo. In someembodiments, the cell is in vitro. In some embodiments, the cell is exvivo. In some embodiments, the cell is in a mammal, such as a human.

In some embodiments, regardless of cell type chosen, 5′ cap-dependenttranslation is impaired in the cell (e.g., decreased, reduced,inhibited, or completely obliterated). In some embodiments, there is nosubstantial 5′ cap-dependent translation in the cell.

The recombinant circular RNA molecule, a DNA molecule encoding same, orvectors comprising same, may be introduced into a cell by any method,including, for example, by transfection, transformation, ortransduction. The terms “transfection,” “transformation,” and“transduction” are used interchangeably herein and refer to theintroduction of one or more exogenous polynucleotides into a host cellby using physical or chemical methods. Many transfection techniques areknown in the art and include, for example, calcium phosphate DNAco-precipitation (see, e.g., Murray E. J. (ed.), Methods in MolecularBiology, Vol. 7, Gene Transfer and Expression Protocols, Humana Press(1991)); DEAE-dextran; electroporation; cationic liposome-mediatedtransfection; tungsten particle-facilitated microparticle bombardment(Johnston, Nature, 346: 776-777 (1990)); strontium phosphate DNAco-precipitation (Brash et al., Mol. Cell. Biol., 7: 2031-2034 (1987);and magnetic nanoparticle-based gene delivery (Dobson, J., Gene Ther, 13(4): 283-7 (2006)).

Naked RNA, DNA molecules encoding circular RNA molecules, or vectorscomprising the circular RNAs or DNAs encoding circular RNAs may beadministered to cells in the form of a composition. In some embodiments,the composition comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Thechoice of carrier will be determined in part by the particular circularRNA molecule, DNA sequence, or vector and type of cell (or cells) intowhich the circular RNA molecule, DNA sequence, or vector is introduced.Accordingly, a variety of formulations of the composition are possible.For example, the composition may contain preservatives, such as, forexample, methylparaben, propylparaben, sodium benzoate, and benzalkoniumchloride. A mixture of two or more preservatives optionally may be used.In addition, buffering agents may be used in the composition. Suitablebuffering agents include, for example, citric acid, sodium citrate,phosphoric acid, potassium phosphate, and various other acids and salts.A mixture of two or more buffering agents optionally may be used.Methods for preparing compositions for pharmaceutical use are known tothose skilled in the art and are described in more detail in, forexample, Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, LippincottWilliams & Wilkins; 21st ed. (May 1, 2005).

In some embodiments, the composition containing the recombinant circularRNA molecule, DNA sequence, or vector, can be formulated as an inclusioncomplex, such as cyclodextrin inclusion complex, or as a liposome.Liposomes can be used to target host cells or to increase the half-lifeof the circular RNA molecule. Methods for preparing liposome deliverysystems are described in, for example, Szoka et al., Ann. Rev. Biophys.Bioeng., 9: 467 (1980), and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,235,871; 4,501,728;4,837,028; and 5,019,369. The recombinant circRNA molecule may also beformulated as a nanoparticle.

A host cell can be contacted in vivo or in vitro with a recombinantcircRNA molecule, a DNA sequence, or a vector, or compositionscontaining any of the foregoing. The term “in vivo” refers to a methodthat is conducted within living organisms in their normal, intact state,while an “in vitro” method is conducted using components of an organismthat have been isolated from its usual biological context. When themethod is conducted in vivo, in some embodiments the production of theprotein is tissue-specific. By “tissue-specific” is meant that theprotein is produced in only a subset of tissue types within an organism,or is produced at higher levels in a subset of tissue types relative tothe baseline expression across all tissue types. The protein may beproduced in any tissue type, such as, for example, tissues of muscle,liver, kidney, brain, lung, skin, pancreas, blood, or heart.

Inhibiting circRNA Translation

The disclosure also provides an oligonucleotide molecule comprising anucleic acid sequence that hybridizes to an internal ribosome entry site(IRES) present on a circular RNA molecule and inhibits translation ofthe circular RNA molecule. In some embodiments, the circular RNAmolecule is a naturally occurring circular RNA molecule. In someembodiments, the circular RNA molecule is a recombinant circular RNAmolecule, such as the recombinant circRNA molecule described herein. Insome embodiments, the recombinant circRNA molecule may comprise aprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence and an IRES operably linked to theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence (optionally, in a non-nativeconfiguration), wherein the IRES comprises at least one RNA secondarystructure; and a sequence that is complementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA(rRNA); and wherein the IRES has a minimum free energy (MFE) of lessthan 18.9 kJ/mol and a melting temperature of at least 35.0° C., asdescribed herein. In some embodiments, the recombinant circRNA moleculemay comprise a protein-coding nucleic acid sequence and an IRES operablylinked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence (optionally, in anon-native configuration); wherein the IRES is encoded by any one of thenucleic acid sequences listed in SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO:229-17201, or a nucleic acid sequence that is at least 90% or at least95% identical thereto.

The oligonucleotide that hybridizes to the IRES on a recombinant circRNAmolecule may be of any type and size. In some embodiments, theoligonucleotide may be about 8 to about 80 nucleotides in length, suchas about 15 to about 30 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, theoligonucleotide may be about 20, about 22, or about 24 nucleotides inlength. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide may be an antisenseoligonucleotide (also referred to as “ASO”). The term “antisenseoligonucleotide,” as used herein, refers to a short, synthetic,single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide or oligodeoxyribonucleotide whichis complementary to a target RNA sequence and can reduce, restore, ormodify protein expression through several distinct mechanisms (Rinaldi,C., Wood, M., Nat Rev Neurol, 14: 9-21 (2018); Crooke, S. T., NucleicAcid Ther., 27: 70-77 (2017); and Chan et al., Clin. Exp. Pharmacol.Physiol. 33: 533-540 (2006)). In some embodiments, the antisenseoligonucleotide may be a locked nucleic acid oligonucleotide (LNA). Theterm “locked nucleic acid (LNA)” refers to oligonucleotides that containone or more nucleotide building blocks in which an extra methylenebridge fixes the ribose moiety either in the C3′-endo (beta-D-LNA) orC2′-endo (alpha-L-LNA) conformation (Grunweller A, Hartmann RK,BioDrugs, 21(4): 235-243 (2007)). In some embodiments, theoligonucleotide is a small interfering RNA (siRNA), small hairpin RNA(shRNA), CRISPR (sgRNA), or micro RNA (miRNA).

The oligonucleotide may comprise one or more modifications that enhancehybridization of the oligonucleotide to the IRES of the circRNA moleculeand/or inhibition of translation of the circRNA molecule. Themodification may be at the 5′ or at the 3′ end of the oligonucleotide.Suitable modifications include, but are not limited to, a modifiedinternucleoside linkage, a modified sugar, or a modified nucleobase. Insome embodiments, the oligonucleotide may be conjugated to a fluorophore(e.g., Cy3, FAM, Alexa 488, etc.) or to another molecule (e.g., biotin,alkaline phosphatase, antibody, nucleic acid aptamer, peptide, etc.). Insome embodiments, the oligonucleotide may be labeled with a peptide orprotein, for example using CLICK chemistry. It will be appreciated thatthe naturally occurring internucleoside linkage of RNA and DNA is a 3′to 5′ phosphodiester linkage. Oligonucleotides having one or moremodified, i.e. non-naturally occurring, internucleoside linkages areknown to exhibit desirable properties such as, for example, enhancedcellular uptake, enhanced affinity for target nucleic acids, andincreased stability in the presence of nucleases. Modifiedinternucleoside linkages include, for example, internucleoside linkagesthat retain a phosphorus atom as well as internucleoside linkages thatdo not have a phosphorus atom. Representative phosphorus-containinginternucleoside linkages include, but are not limited to,phosphodiesters, phosphotriesters, methylphosphonates, phosphoramidate,and phosphorothioates. Methods of preparing phosphorous-containing andnon-phosphorous-containing linkages are well known.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide molecule may comprise amodified backbone. Oligonucleotides having modified backbones includethose that retain a phosphorus atom in the backbone and those that donot have a phosphorus atom in the backbone. Modified oligonucleotidesthat do not have a phosphorus atom in their internucleoside backbone maybe referred to as “oligonucleosides.” Examples of modifiedoligonucleotide backbones include, but are not limited to,phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates,phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotri-esters, methyl and other alkylphosphonates including 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylenephosphonates and chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidatesincluding 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates,thiono-phosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates,thionoalkylphospho-triesters, selenophosphates and boranophosphateshaving normal 3′-5′ linkages, 2′-5′ linked analogs of these, and thosehaving inverted polarity wherein one or more internucleotide linkages isa 3′ to 3′, 5′ to 5′, or 2′ to 2′ linkage.

The oligonucleotide molecule may further comprise one or morenucleotides having modified sugar moieties. Sugar modifications mayimpart nuclease stability, binding affinity or some other beneficialbiological property to the oligonucleotide. The furanosyl sugar ring ofa nucleoside can be modified in a number of ways including, but notlimited to, addition of a substituent group, particularly at the 2′position; bridging of two non-geminal ring atoms to form a bicyclicnucleic acid (BNA); and substitution of an atom or group such as —S—,—N(R)— or —C(R¹)(R²) for the ring oxygen at the 4′-position. Modifiedsugars include, but are not limited to: substituted sugars, especially2′-substituted sugars having a 2′-F, 2′-OCH₂ (2′-OMe) or a2′-O(CH₂)2-OCH₃ (2′-O-methoxyethyl or 2′-MOE) substituent group; andbicyclic modified sugars (BNAs), having a 4′-(CH₂)n-O-2′ bridge, wheren=1 or n=2. Methods for the preparation of modified sugars are wellknown to those skilled in the art.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide may be chemically modified atits 5′ and/or its 3′ end. In other words, one or more moieties may bechemically (e.g., covalently) linked to the 5′ and/or 3′ end of theoligonucleotide molecule. Such modifications include, for example,chemical linkage of protein or sugar moieties to the 5′ and/or 3′ end ofthe oligonucleotide molecule. Other modifications that enhanceoligonucleotide affinity for target nucleic acids and/or increaseoligonucleotide stability are known in the art (see, e.g., U.S. PatentApplication Publication US 2019/0323013) and may be employed in thecontext of the present disclosure.

The disclosure also provides a method of inhibiting translation of aprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence present on a circular RNA molecule,which method comprises contacting the circular RNA molecule with theabove-described oligonucleotide molecule, whereby the oligonucleotidemolecule hybridizes to the RNA secondary structure and/or the nucleicacid sequence complementary to 18S rRNA present on the IRES of thecircular RNA molecule and inhibits translation of the circular RNAmolecule.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide can hybridize to either the RNAsecondary structure element or the nucleic acid sequence that iscomplementary to 18S rRNA present on the IRES. In other embodiments, theoligonucleotide can hybridize to both the RNA secondary structureelement and the nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to 18S rRNA.For example, a first oligonucleotide may hybridize to the RNA secondarystructure element and a second oligonucleotide may hybridize to thenucleic acid sequence that is complementary to 18S rRNA. Alternatively,a single oligonucleotide may hybridize to both the RNA secondarystructure element and the nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to18S rRNA present on the IRES. Appropriate hybridization stringencyconditions are described herein.

Also provided is a composition comprising (i) a DNA sequence disclosedherein and a (ii) non-coding circular RNA, or a DNA sequence encodingthe same. The DNA sequence may encode a circRNA. In some embodiments,the non-coding circular RNA may comprise one or more of a binding sitefor an RNA binding protein, an aptamer, or a miRNA sponge. In someembodiments, the non-coding circular RNA may have one or more functions,such as sponging miRNAs, regulating mRNA splicing machinery,sequestering RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), regulating RBP interaction, oractivating immune responses.

Also provided is a method of delivering a non-coding circular RNA to acell, the method comprising contacting the cell with a compositioncomprising (i) a DNA sequence disclosed herein and a (ii) non-codingcircular RNA, or a DNA sequence encoding the same, thereby deliveringthe non-coding circular RNA to the cell.

The following examples further illustrate the invention but, of course,should not be construed as in any way limiting its scope.

EXAMPLES

The following examples describe the development of a high-throughputscreen to systematically identify and quantify RNA sequences that candirect circRNA translation. Over 17,000 circRNA internal ribosome entrysites (IRES) were identified and validated, and it was shown that 18SrRNA complementarity and a structured RNA element on the IRES areimportant for facilitating circRNA cap-independent translation. Withgenomic and peptidomic analyses of the IRES, nearly 1,000 putativeendogenous protein-coding circRNAs were identified, along with hundredsof translational units encoded by these circRNAs. circFGFR1p, a proteinencoded by circFGFR1, was also characterized. This protein functions asa negative regulator of FGFR1 to suppress cell growth under stressconditions.

Example 1

This example describes the systematic identification of RNA sequencesthat facilitate cap-independent circRNA translation. Canonicaltranslation via a cap-independent mechanism may be reduced in numeroushuman diseases. Accordingly, the use of circRNAs to express proteins maybe particularly helpful for treating such diseases.

To systematically identify the RNA sequence that can facilitatecap-independent translation on circRNAs, an oligo-split-eGFP-circRNAreporter construct was developed that allows for screening andquantifying the cap-independent translation activity of syntheticoligonucleotide inserts (“oligos” hereafter) on circRNA in ahigh-throughput manner (FIG. 1A). Specifically, the construct contains abicistronic mRuby reporter followed by a permuted split-eGFP reporterflanked by human ZKSCAN1 introns, where during transcription, thepre-mRNA of the construct will undergo spliceosome-mediatedback-splicing and reconstitute full-length eGFP on the circRNA. Becausefull-length eGFP is only reconstituted upon back-splicing, the eGFPfluorescence signal can only come from the circRNA throughcap-independent translation. A synthetic oligonucleotide library wasthen cloned into the construct to drive the expression of eGFP reporter(FIG. 1A). The library contained 55,000 oligos of sequences from thereported IRESs in the IRESite database (including human and non-humanIRES; see Mokrejš et al., Nucleic acids research 38, D131-D136 (2009)),the native 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) of viral and human genes, andthe native and synthetic sequences from viral and human transcripts(FIG. 1A). Library design is detailed in Weingarten-Gabbay et al.,Science 351, aad4939 (2016). For the viral and human transcripts, geneswere selected that have been reported to remain associated withpolysomes when the cap-dependent translation was suppressed and thegenes with alternative isoforms that differ in their translation startsite (FIG. 1A).

Two well-known concerns for bicistronic IRES screens are crypticpromoters or splice sites that activate transcription or readthrough ofthe downstream open reading frame (ORF), respectively. The design usedherein obviates both concerns because ectopic transcription of only the5′ fragment of the split-eGFP cannot produce fluorescence signal.Northern blots, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chainreaction (qRT-PCR), RNase R treatment, and reporter gene experimentsconfirmed that the eGFP signal detected did not come from trans-splicingor the nicking of the eGFP circRNA (FIG. 8A-8C). The reporter produces a3000 nucleotide (nt) primary linear transcript and a ˜900 nt eGFPcircRNA; RNase R exonuclease treatment can efficiently remove the lineartranscript but not the circRNA (FIG. 8A). The mRuby gene allowed fornormalization for transduction efficiency by translation of a regularlinear mRNA. Following transfection into human embryonic kidney (HEK)293T cells, the transfected cells were sorted by the ratio of eGFP tomRuby fluorescence into seven bins, and deconvoluted the frequencies ofoligo sequences in each pool by deep sequencing (FIG. 1A). With thissystem, it is possible quantify the cap-independent translation activityon circRNA for each oligo in the library in a high-throughput manner.

40,855 out of 55,000 oligos were captured from the library (˜74.3%). Toquantify the eGFP expression level of each oligo, the mean weighted rankdistribution of the reads across the bins was calculated. The weight ofeach bin is the fraction of the number of reads in this bin of its totalreads in all seven bins. The rank is the bin number from the bin withthe lowest eGFP intensity (bin #1) to the bin with the highest eGFPintensity (bin #7). (FIG. 1B). It was found that the quantification oftranslation activity was highly reproducible between two independentbiological replicates (Pearson's correlation coefficient R=0.70) (FIG.9A). It was further confirmed that the results were not confounded bythe change of circRNA back-splicing efficiency due to different oligoinserts (FIGS. 9B and 9C). This screening assay revealed three groups ofoligos according to their eGFP expression level—a group (˜2,500) ofoligos which showed no eGFP expression (eGFP expression (bin)=0.0), andtwo groups of oligos showing a bimodal distribution of eGFP expression(eGFP expression (bin)=0.8-2.2 and 2.4-7.0, respectively). To determinethe oligos with cap-independent translation activity (eGFP(+) oligos),the weighted rank distribution of the eGFP intensity of the cellstransfected with no-IRES-inserted reporter plasmid (empty eGFP circRNA)was calculated as the background eGFP expression. The oligos weredefined as eGFP(+) oligos were the oligos with eGFP expression higherthan the background eGFP expression (eGFP expression (bin)=3.466387)(FIG. 1B). The background eGFP expression was calculated based on thedistribution of the reads across the bins rather than a simple cut offvalue, which is a more conservative approach to avoid possible falsepositive events because the empty circRNA eGFP reporter could have weaktranslation activity (FIG. 9D). With this approach, 17,201 eGFP(+)oligos were identified from the screening assay (FIG. 1B, SEQ ID NO:1-17201). Further, it was verified that the screening result was noteGFP reporter specific because the eGFP(+) oligos identified were ableto initiate circRNA translation of reporters with different codingsequences (CDSs) (FIG. 9E). Although circRNA translation is reproduciblydetected, substantially weaker cap-independent translation activity wasobserved for the circRNA driven by the eGFP(+) oligos compared to thelinear RNA translation driven by the cap-dependent translation (FIG.9F).

Because a previous study has utilized the same synthetic oligo libraryon a linear bicistronic eGFP reporter screening assay to identify oligoswith cap-independent translation activity on linear RNA overno-IRES-inserted reporter plasmid as threshold (Weingarten-Gabbay etal., 2016), it was possible to compare the cap-independent translationactivity of each oligo sequence on linear RNA and circular RNArespectively. For each oligo, the normalized eGFP expression wascalculated, from the circRNA vs. from the linear RNA template. It wasdiscovered that among the oligos captured in both circRNA and linear RNAreporter screens (n=13,645), a large number of the oligos showedcap-independent translation activity in both linear and circular RNAscreening system (n=7,424) (FIG. 1D, FIG. 11A). However, there waslittle correlation between the overall IRES activity of circular vs.linear RNA (Pearson's R=0.014; Spearman's R=0.010) (FIG. 1D).Interestingly, some oligos were also captured that show IRES activityspecifically in either linear or circular screening system (linear IRESand circular IRES, respectively) (FIG. 1D). To define linear andcircular IRES, a more conservative approach was taken, where linear IRESrepresents the oligo showing cap-independent translation activity in thelinear RNA screening system only; and circular IRES represents the oligoshowing cap-independent translation activity in the circular RNAscreening system only. With this approach, 4,582 circular IRESs and1,639 linear IRESs were identified (FIG. 1D, FIG. 11A).

Furthermore, when the distribution of the human and viral IRES wasexamined among circular IRES, linear IRES, and the IRES showingtranslation activity in both linear and circular RNA, respectively, nosignificant difference was found among the IRES (FIG. 11B-11D). Theresult suggests that the recruitment or the activity of circRNA-specificIRES trans-acting factors (ITAFs) on the circular IRES may depend oncircRNA-specific biogenesis, such as circRNA back-splicing or circRNAnuclear export to distinguish circRNAs from linear RNAs. Together, theseresults demonstrate that the high-throughput screening assay utilizingthe circRNA reporter construct is able to systematically identify theRNA sequences harboring IRES activity that can facilitatecap-independent translation on circRNA.

Example 2

This example demonstrates that synthetic circRNAs harboring eGFP+ oligosequences are actively translated.

To validate the screening results of Example 1, polysome profiling wasused to examine whether circRNAs containing the identified eGFP(+) oligosequence are actively translated and engaged on the ribosome. First,HEK-293T cells were transfected with the oligo-split-eGFP-circRNAreporter construct containing the synthetic oligo library, treated thetransfected cells with cycloheximide (CHX), and isolated(poly)ribosome-associated RNAs with sucrose gradient fractionation (FIG.2A, 2B, FIG. 12A). Further, the fractions with RNase R were treated toobtain high enrichment of (poly)ribosome-associated circRNAs andhigh-throughput sequencing was performed to identify the IRES sequencesharbored by the circRNA in each fraction. The RNase R treatment wasperformed in conditions that allows RNase R to digest potentialG-quadruplex containing linear RNA efficiently, and the RNase Rdigestion duration was optimized to obtain >100 fold circRNA enrichmentover linear RNA (FIG. 12B). In comparison to the CHX treatment, treatingtransfected cells with puromycin (PMY) caused translated circRNAsshifting from the poly(ribosome)-associated fractions to the 40Sfraction (FIG. 12C), suggesting that CHX treatment is able to capturetranslated circRNAs. To avoid the result being confounded by the weaklytranslated circRNAs (data not shown), the ratio of(poly)ribosome-enriched oligos among the eGFP(+) oligos with eGFPexpression above the 80th percentile was calculated and compared withthe eGFP(−) oligos with eGFP expression below the 20th percentile. Theresult demonstrated that the eGFP(+) oligos are more enriched in the(poly)ribosome fractions (57.2%) than the eGFP(−) oligos (17.9%) (FIG.2C). It was confirmed that the higher enrichment of(poly)ribosome-associated eGFP(+) oligos was not caused by the capturingefficiency or the expression level of the oligos (FIGS. 12D and 12E).The result suggests that the circRNAs containing the eGFP(+) oligosequences are more actively translated. However, since polysomeprofiling has a lower sensitivity for capturing weakly translatedcircRNAs (data not shown), quantitative translation initiationsequencing (QTI-seq) data was utilized for additional validation. Next,published data from the QTI-seq was examined, which is a modifiedribosome-profiling (Ribo-seq) technique that maps the translationinitiation sites (TIS) genome-wide (Gao et al., Nat Methods 12, 147-153,2015). First, it was examined if the eGFP(+) oligo sequences overlapwith those identified TIS on the human transcripts. The resultsdemonstrated that among the oligos derived from the human genome withRibo-seq coverage, the majority of the eGFP(+) oligos (˜76%) overlapswith the identified TIS on human transcripts identified by QTI-seq(TIS(+) oligos), while only 30% of the eGFP(−) oligos are TIS(+) (FIGS.2D and 2E, FIG. 13A), suggesting that the eGFP(+) oligos are more likelyto initiate translation at those TIS than the eGFP(−) oligos.Interestingly, by examining the eGFP(+)/TIS(+) oligos on the humangenome, three types of eGFP(+)/TIS(+) oligos were identified: (1) oligoscontaining the translated initiation site that have been annotated onlinear transcripts (annotated TIS; aTIS), (2) oligos containing thetranslated initiation site that were not annotated on linear transcripts(non-annotated TIS; nTIS) which can be located at the 5′ UTR, CDS or 3′UTR region of the transcripts, and (3) oligos containing both aTIS andnTIS signal (dual TIS; dTIS) (FIGS. 2D and 2E). These different types ofTIS(+) oligos may suggest that the oligos utilized different mechanismsfor initiating translation. While aTIS oligos (˜30%) may utilize thesame annotated translation initiation site as the linear transcript forcap-independent translation, nTIS (˜41%) in contrast represent noveltranslation initiation sites that are different from the lineartranscript for cap-independent translation, which has been observed ininitiating the synthesis of alternative translation products. For dTISoligos, they may utilize some uncharacterized regulatory mechanisms tocoordinate the dual activity between aTIS and nTIS which require furtherinvestigation. Importantly, while the oligo library was enriched of theoligos located at the upstream of the annotated start codon, no bias wasobserved towards the ratio of aTIS oligos, suggesting that the resultwas not confounded by the design of the oligo library. Interestingly, itwas found that eGFP(+)/TIS(+) oligos are located within the genomicregions that encode annotated circRNAs (FIG. 2D), which suggests thatthese circRNA may utilize the TIS on the oligo for initiating endogenouscircRNA translation. Nevertheless, when the position of translationinitiation sites was mapped on each oligo, no translation initiation hotspots were observed on the oligo (FIG. 13B), suggesting that thetranslation initiation is not influenced by the position on the oligo.Together, the results above provide strong evidence that the screeningassay described herein is able to identify the oligo sequences that arecapable of facilitating cap-independent translation activity oncircRNAs.

Example 3

This example describes the identification of 18S rRNA complementarysequences that facilitate circRNA translation.

Watson-Crick base-pairing between IRES and 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA)has been demonstrated to facilitate cap-independent translation oflinear mRNAs. Thus, it was evaluated whether the screen may identify theregions on human 18S rRNA that can interact with circRNA IRES andfacilitate cap-independent translation. The synthetic oligo library wasdesigned to contain 171 oligos with sequences complementary to human 18SrRNA, with a 10-nt sliding window between each consecutive oligo thatreconstitutes the entire 1869-nt full-length 18S rRNA sequence (FIG. 3A,SEQ ID NO: 28977-28983). For each position on the 18S rRNA, the averageeGFP expression of all the oligos containing the correspondingcomplementary sequence was calculated. With this sliding window method,the circRNA IRES activity was determined for each 10-nt window acrossthe human 18S rRNA sequence (FIG. 3A). Six “active regions” on the 18SrRNA were identified, where the complementary sequence within theseactive regions shows average eGFP expression higher than the backgroundeGFP expression (FIG. 3B). Interestingly, active regions 2, 4, 5, and 6harbor helices that have been reported to contact mRNAs in theeukaryotic ribosome initiation complex and interact with translated RNAs(Pisarev et al., EMBO J 27, 1609-1621 (2008)) (FIG. 3C). Furthermore,active region 4, and active regions 2 and 6, harbored the sequences thathave been characterized to facilitate cap-independent translation ofIGF1R and HCV IRES, respectively, by Watson-Crick base pairing (FIG.3C). Active region 3 is located in one of the expansion segments on 18SrRNA (ES6S), which has been implicated in the recruitment of eukaryoticinitiation factor 3 (eIF3). eIF3 directly binds to the 5′ UTRN6-methyladenosine (m6A) of linear mRNA and initiates cap-independenttranslation, suggesting that active region 3 on 18S rRNA may be crucialfor eIF3-m6A-mediated cap-independent translation. Active region 1 islocated in another expansion segment on 18S rRNA (ES3S) that interactsand forms a tertiary structure with active region 3, which suggests thatactive region 1 may be involved in the eIF3-m6A-mediated cap-independenttranslation as well. These results suggest that the active regions on18S rRNA identified indeed play roles in facilitating cap-independenttranslation.

Since the 7-mers derived from active region 4 have been shown to beenriched in reported IRES for linear RNAs, all 7-mers were extractedfrom the sequence complementary to the active regions of 18S rRNA(active 7-mers), and the number of active 7-mers harbored by the eGFP(+)and eGFP(−) oligos, respectively, were compared. It was found thateGFP(+) oligos have higher enrichment of active 7-mers than eGFP(−)oligos (FIG. 3D). In contrast, when the matched-number of random 7-merswhich do not overlap with the active 7-mers between eGFP(+) and eGFP(−)oligos was compared, no significant difference was found (FIG. 3D),suggesting that the higher enrichment of active 7-mers in eGFP(+) oligosobserved here is specific to the 18S rRNA complementary sequence.Nevertheless, no hot spot positions of the active 7-mers located on thecircRNA IRES were observed (FIG. 13C). To further validate the results,the 18S rRNA complementarity of the IRES was perturbed by eithersubstituting the 18S rRNA complementary sequence with a random 7-mer oradding the flanking 18S rRNA complementary sequence to the IRES andmeasured their circRNA translation activity (FIG. 3E). Diminished IRESactivity was observed with lower 18S rRNA complementarity on the IRES,and conversely stronger IRES activity was programmed with higher 18SrRNA complementarity added to the IRES (FIG. 3E). These results suggestthat the circRNA IRES containing RNA sequence complementary to theactive regions on 18S rRNA is one of the regulatory elements that canfacilitate cap-independent translation on circRNA.

Example 4

This example describes the identification of essential elements oncircRNA IRES using systematic scanning mutagenesis.

Scanning mutagenesis was employed to define the essential elements oncircRNA IRES. Included in this analysis were oligos designed forscanning mutagenesis of 99 reported IRESs and 734 native 5′ UTRs in thesynthetic oligo library. The oligos were designed as non-overlappingsliding windows of 14-nt random substitution mutation tiling across theentire IRES or 5′ UTR (FIG. 3F). With the screening results, it waspossible to determine the effect of the substitution mutations on each14-nt window on IRES activity across each oligo sequence (FIG. 3F). Theessential elements (FIG. 3G; highlighted in blue) were determined as theregion from the start position of the mutation (FIG. 3G; black dots)where there was a sharp decrease of the IRES activity to the next startposition of the mutation where the IRES activity was resumed or abovethe mean eGFP expression level. By comparing the quantification resultwith a well-characterized IRES, hepatitis C virus (HCV) IRES, it wasobserved that the known functional domains on the HCV IRES (FIG. 3G;redlines) co-localized with the mutation positions that havedramatically reduction in IRES activity. The specific reduction in IRESactivity at those mutation positions suggested that the mutationsdisrupted essential elements of the IRES, abolishing its cap-independenttranslation activity. The results demonstrated that the assay can indeedcapture all of the reported essential elements on the HCV IRES, as wellas one possible novel essential element that has not been characterizedyet (FIG. 3G).

The same scanning mutagenesis assay was also utilized to furtheridentify the essential elements on the identified circRNA IRES byscanning mutagenesis. The synthetic oligo library contains oligoscarrying sliding windows of 14-nt random substitution mutation tilingacross the circRNA IRES. With the scanning mutagenesis, two classes ofcircRNA IRES were captured—circRNA IRES with local sensitivity, whichshows reduction in circRNA IRES activity only when a specific positionin mutated (FIG. 311 ; top), and circRNA IRES with global sensitivity,which mutation in most positions can cause reduction in IRES activity(FIG. 311 ; bottom). The local and global sensitive IRES were defined aswhether the IRES activity was affected by a single mutation or multiplemutations, respectively. The global sensitive IRESs have more structuredsequences (i.e., significantly lower minimum free energy (MFE) value)compared to local sensitive IRESs; which suggests that the overallsecondary structure of global sensitive IRESs are crucial for their IRESactivity, because the more structured sequences are more likely to beaffected by the mutation regardless of the position of the mutation. Onthe other hand, local sensitive IRESs have less structured sequences andare more resistant to the mutation; which suggests that the IRESactivity of local sensitive IRESs may be regulated by a short sequenceas the essential element.

By overlaying the eGFP expression level of all the captured circRNAIRESs with global sensitivity, three regions (5-15 nt, 40-60 nt, and135-165 nt) were identified on the IRES, where when the mutation hitthese regions, the IRES activity decreased significantly (FIG. 3I),suggesting that these regions may harbor the key elements forfacilitating cap-independent translation of the circRNA IRES. To furthercharacterize if the element harbored by the regions isstructure-dependent, the local MFE was calculated along the circRNAIRESs with global sensitivity in a 15 nt non-overlapping window. It wasdiscovered that the local MFE of the 40-60 nt region on the circRNA IRESshows significantly lower local MFE (FIGS. 3I and 3J; shaded in red),suggesting that this region may harbor the local structural element thatcan drive circRNA translation. In contrast, the local MFE of 5-15 nt and135-165 nt regions do not differ from other regions on the IRES (FIGS.3I and 3J; shaded in blue), which suggests that the regulatory elementslocated at these two regions are not involved in local secondarystructures.

Taken together, this data indicates that, with scanning mutagenesis, theassay is able to determine circRNA IRES with local or globalsensitivity, and systematically identify essential circRNA IRES elementsthat are required for IRES activity in a high-throughput manner.

Example 5

This example demonstrates that a stem-loop structure at distinctpositions on circRNA IRESs facilitates cap-independent translation.

While many native and synthetic IRES have been reported to be able tofacilitate cap-independent translation on circRNA, most of the IRES werecharacterized in a linear RNA reporter system, and no differential IRESactivity of IRES on linear vs. circular RNA has been reported yet. Bycomparing the screening results from the circRNA reporter systemdescribed herein with the previous screening study done on a linear RNAreporter system using the same synthetic oligo library, two distinctgroups of oligos were identified that harbor IRES activity on eitherlinear or circular RNA specifically (linear IRES and circular IRES,respectively). To characterize the features on these oligos that candistinguish linear and circular IRESs, the primary sequence of theoligos was analyzed, and it was discovered that circular IRES containhigher GC-content and lower MFE than linear IRES (FIG. 14A). On theother hand, the number of the canonical translation start-codon (AUG),the Kozak consensus sequence (ACCAUGG, SEQ ID NO: 34039), and the m6Amotif (RRACH, SEQ ID NO: 33944) showed no difference between linear andcircular IRESs (FIG. 14B-14D). Since RNA with low MFE often indicatesthat the RNA has a stable secondary structure, the low MFE of circularIRES suggests some structural elements may play a role in facilitatingcap-independent translation activity on circRNA.

The secondary structure of linear and circular IRES was thencharacterized with M2-seq, an assay of systematic mutational profilingand chemical structure probing that captures RNA secondary structurewith very low false-positive rate. Four circular IRES and linear IRESwere selected that specifically show IRES activity on circRNA or linearRNA, respectively (FIG. 14E) and their secondary structure wasdetermined with M2-seq. These oligos were selected because they harborstrong IRES activity in circular RNA system (circular IRES: 6742, 9128,19420 and 18377) or linear RNA system (linear IRES: 6885, 6103, 5471 and6527), respectively, and do not show any activity of read-throughtranslation, ribosome re-initiation, and hidden promoter activity on thelinear bicistronic construct to ensure that the eGFP signal detectedhere on the linear bicistronic construct came from the cap-independenttranslation of the oligos. The M2-seq results revealed that while linearIRES harbored structured elements, the circular IRES are in general morestructured than linear IRES (FIGS. 4A and 4B, FIGS. 14F and 14G). Amongall four circular IRES examined, all contained a stem-loop structuredRNA element (SuRE) on the IRES at a distinct position (40-60 nt positionfrom the +1 position (the first nucleotide) of the IRES), while all thelinear IRES examined did not contain such a structure at this position(FIGS. 4A and 4B, FIGS. 14F and 14G). In line with previous systematicscanning mutation profiling, which also suggests that this distinctposition on IRES contains structural element required for facilitatingcircRNA translation (FIGS. 3I and 3J), it was proposed that the SuRE atthis distinct position on the IRES can facilitate cap-independenttranslation activity on circular IRES.

To test this hypothesis, the SuRE at 40-60 nt position on the circularIRES (oligo index: 6742) was disrupted by substituting it with thesequence extracted from the same position on the linear IRES (oligoindex: 6885), forming a different secondary structure at this position(FIG. 4C). Interestingly, disrupting the SuRE at this position on thecircular IRES leads to a reduction in its IRES activity (FIG. 4I).Moreover, to test if the SuRE element is position sensitive, the SuREelement was relocated from the 40-60 nt position to the 90-110 ntposition by swapping the sequences of these two regions on the IRES. Adecreased translation activity of the IRES was observed (FIGS. 4D and4I). To further validate that the SuRE is structural dependent ratherthan sequence-dependent, compensatory mutagenesis of the SuRE elementwas performed. Specifically, each of the seven base pairs on the stemregion of the SuRE element were mutated to disrupt its duplex structure.Lower translation activity of the IRES was observed (FIGS. 4E and 4I).Furthermore, the translation activity of the IRES can be rescued bycompensatory double complementary mutations to restore each of the sevenbase pairs on the stem region (FIGS. 4F and 4I). Interestingly, when theSuRE was substituted with MS2 or BoxB, which have a similar RNAstructure, the same IRES activity was observed as the wild-type IRES(FIGS. 4G and 4I), suggesting that the IRES activity regulated by theSuRE is indeed structure-dependent rather than sequence-dependent.Finally, the linear IRES was converted into a circular IRES bytransplanting the SuRE from the circular IRES to the 40-60 nt positionon the linear IRES (FIGS. 411 and 4I). The results above suggest thatthe 40-60 nt SuRE on the IRES can indeed facilitate circRNA translation.

Together, the results above along with the 18S rRNA profiling suggestthat two key regulatory elements on circRNA IRES, the 18S rRNAcomplementarity and 40-60 nt SuRE on the IRES, can facilitatecap-independent translation on circRNA. In line with this model, amongthe 17,201 eGFP(+) oligos captured by the screen, 12,091 of them (˜70%)harbor high 18S rRNA complementarity (18S rRNA complementarity (+)) or40-60 nt SuRE (SuRE(+)) (FIG. 4J), which suggests that these tworegulatory elements can facilitate the exogenous reporter circRNAtranslation. To further validate if these two regulatory elements canalso facilitate endogenous circRNA translation, the polysome-associatedcircRNAs (translating circRNAs) captured in HEK-293 cells (Ragan et al.,2019) were examined, and it was found that 123 out of 165 endogenoustranslate circRNAs (˜75%) are 18S rRNA complementarity (+) or 40-60 ntSuRE(+) circRNAs (FIG. 4J), indicating that these two regulatoryelements are common features among the endogenous translated circRNAs.These results suggest that the 18S rRNA complementarity and 40-60 ntSuRE can facilitate the translation of both exogenous reporter circRNAsand endogenous circRNAs. Nevertheless, no preferential localization ofthe 18S complementary sequence to the 5′ or 3′ of the SuRE was observed(FIG. 13C); this suggests that the SuRE on the IRES may cause a pausefor RNA unwinding, increasing the chance for the 18S complementarysequence on the IRES to interact with the 18S 25 rRNA on the ribosome,and facilitate cap-independent translation on circRNAs (FIG. 4K).

Example 6

This example demonstrates that the IRES elements facilitate translationinitiation of endogenous circRNAs.

To examine if the key regulatory elements identified on the IRES, suchas the 18S rRNA complementary sequence and the SuRE at the 40-60 ntposition, can facilitate translation of human endogenous circRNAs, alocked nucleic acid (LNA) was utilized to disrupt these key elements onthe IRES because LNA has been utilized to specifically disrupt thefunctional regions on the HCV IRES and inhibit HCV IRES activity.Anti-sense LNAs were designed targeting (i) the 18S rRNA complementarysequence on the IRES to block 18S rRNA binding to the IRES (LNA-18S),(ii) the SuRE at the 40-60 nt position to disrupt the SuRE on the IRES(LNA-SuRE), and (iii) random position downstream of the LNA-18S orLNA-SuRE on the IRES (LNA-Rnd) for identified IRESs (FIG. 5A). The LNAswere then co-transfected with the oligo-split-eGFP-circRNA reporterconstruct containing the corresponding IRES, respectively, andtranslation activity of the eGFP reporter was measured by its normalizedfluorescence signal intensity. It was found that co-transfecting LNA-18Sor LNA-SuRE can indeed disrupt the cap-independent translation activityof all IRESs (10 out of 10 LNAs), while most of the LNA-Rndco-transfection did not affect the translation activity of the IRES (4out of 5 LNAs) (FIG. 5B). It was also confirmed that the result was notconfounded by the change of circRNA expression level becauseco-transfecting the LNAs generally did not change the circRNA expressionlevel (FIG. 15A). The result suggests that disrupting the key elementson the IRES with LNA can affect the cap-independent translation activityof the exogenous reporter circRNA.

To further examine if the identified key regulatory elements on the IREScan also facilitate translation of human endogenous circRNAs, the cellswere transfected with the corresponding anti-sense LNA and quantifiedtranslating circRNAs by the QTI method. Specifically, to isolatetranslating RNAs, LNA-transfected cells were treated with lactimidomycin(LTM) followed by puromycin (PMY) treatment, ribosome-associated RNAswere sedimented with sucrose cushion, and the translating RNAs werepurified (FIG. 5C). The level of translating endogenous circRNA was thenquantified, which contains the LNA-targeted IRES by qRT-PCR using thedivergent primers spanning across the back-splicing junction of thecircRNA. It was found that disrupting the key regulatory elements byLNA-18S or LNA-SuRE on the IRES of the endogenous circRNA can in generalcause decreased translation activity of the circRNAs (8 out of 10 LNAs),while all the LNA-Rnd did not influence the translation activity of theendogenous circRNAs (5 out of 5 LNAs) (FIG. 5D). It was also confirmedthat the LNA transfection did not change the expression level of theendogenous circRNAs (FIG. 15B). Since QTI method specifically capturedthe RNAs that are at the initiation stage of translation, it suggestedthat the decrease of endogenous circRNA translation observed upon LNAtransfection came from the decrease in translation initiation. Theresults were further validated by quantifying the protein level producedfrom the endogenous circRNAs by Western blotting. The Western blottingresult matched what was observed in the QTI-qRT-PCR result—disruptingthe key regulatory elements on the IRES of the endogenous circRNAgenerally reduces the protein level produced from the circRNA (3 out of4 LNAs) (FIG. 5E). The results above suggest that the key elementsidentified on the IRES, such as the 18S rRNA complementary sequence andthe SuRE at the 40-60 nt position, are important for facilitatingtranslation initiation of endogenous circRNAs.

Example 7

This example describes the identification of possible endogenousprotein-coding circRNAs. Introducing synthetic IRES on circRNAs issufficient to initiate cap-independent translation, suggesting thatendogenous circRNAs harboring the active circular IRES may have thepotential of producing proteins with cap-independent translation. Thus,to determine the potential circRNA proteome, the eGFP(+) oligo sequencescaptured in the screens to the human circRNA database (circBase) (Glazaret al., RNA 20, 1666-1670 (2014)) to identify the endogenous circRNAswhich harbor the active IRES. Data was gated against false positive byonly considering circRNAs that have been annotated by two differentcircRNA prediction algorithms, and only including circRNAs with highmapping score in this analysis. The result suggested a high proportionof the endogenous circRNAs are potentially protein-coding: Out of 2,052endogenous circRNAs containing the oligo sequences from the syntheticlibrary used for the screening assay, 979 circRNAs (˜48%) contain one ormore eGFP(+) oligo sequences (IRES(+) circRNAs) (FIG. 6A, FIG. 16A,Table 6). These circRNAs were generated from various parent genes whichshowed a fairly homogenous distribution across the genome (Giniindex=0.38) (FIG. 6B). To further determine if these IRES(+) circRNAsare associated with cancer progression, the cancer-specific circRNAdatabase (CSCD) (Xia et al., Nucleic Acids Res 46, D925-D929 (2018)) wasexamined, which contains the collection of potential cancer-associatedcircRNAs by analyzing the RNA-seq data of 228 cancer and normal celllines. Interestingly, it was discovered that 294 of 979 IRES(+) circRNAs(˜30%) are expressed specifically in either non-transformed cell lines(n=141 cell lines) or cancer cell lines (n=87 cell lines across 19cancer types), respectively (FIG. 6C), indicating their potentialassociation with cancer progression.

It was discovered that most IRES(+) circRNAs contain only one IRES (FIG.6D) and most eGFP(+) oligos map to only one circRNA (FIG. 6E),suggesting a specific one-to-one relationship between these IRES(+)circRNAs and the proteins encoded by them. This result is expected inpart based on the library design. In addition, for 159 transcripts forwhich oligos tiling across the entire transcripts were designed, apreponderance of one IRES per circRNA was observed (FIGS. 16B and 16C).Thus, circRNA IRES would have been difficult, if impossible, to discoverby comparative sequence analysis across circRNAs, but can be discoveredby unbiased functional screening. The result also suggests that circRNAIRES activity may require long RNA sequences which are more likely toshow up once per transcript, rather than very short or repetitivesequences that would show up multiple times per transcript. Furthermore,it was discovered that the position of mapped eGFP(+) oligos on circRNAsis most frequently near the back-splicing junction of the circRNA(within 100-200 nt from the junction), while the average position ofGC-matched oligos (the 174 nt oligos on the IRES-mapped circRNA with thesame GC content as the mapped eGFP(+) oligo) showed a randomdistribution across a wide range of distance from the back-splicingjunction on the circRNAs (100 to 2000 nt from the junction) (FIG. 16D).This result suggests that the cap-independent translation activity ofthe IRES on the circRNA is back-splicing dependent—the IRES element orits downstream open reading frame (ORF) is only assembled uponback-splicing. This requires the IRES to be located in the proximity ofthe junction to facilitate its cap-independent translation activity.Finally, gene ontology (GO) analysis of the parent genes of thesecircRNAs suggested that they are enriched in stress-response andtranslation regulation (FIG. 6F). Above all, these results demonstratedthat with the identified eGFP(+) oligo sequences, it is possible todetermine endogenous circRNAs with potential cap-independent translationactivity that may encode new protein isoforms.

Example 8

This example describes the identification of potential endogenouscircRNA-encoded polypeptides.

In order to determine the polypeptide sequence of proteins encoded byRNA, protein-coding sequence on the RNA were defined. This is commonlyachieved by ORF analysis. However, ORF analysis on circRNAs oftenreturns a large number of results due to the lack of information ofwhere translation initiates on the circRNA. The data presented hereincan map the position of eGFP(+) oligo sequences on the circRNA, whichallows for determination of the regions on circRNAs where thetranslation start sites may be located. Thus, to determine the potentialpolypeptide sequence of the proteins encoded by the endogenous circRNAs,the eGFP(+) oligo sequences were mapped to the sequence of eachindividual high-confident circRNA in the circBase (pre-gated the highconfident circRNAs as described above) to determine the location of theIRES on each circRNA (FIG. 6G). Predicted polypeptide sequences of theprotein(s) encoded by each circRNA were then generated by performing ORFanalysis from the immediate downstream translation initiation codon(AUG) of the mapped IRES location (FIG. 6G). Because many IRES have beenreported to be able to initiate translation from non-canonicalinitiation codons, ORF analysis was also performed on the top threeframes (+1 to +3) with non-canonical initiation codons from the mappedIRES position (FIG. 6G). With this method, a list of predictedpolypeptide sequences encoded by human endogenous circRNAs (circORFs)was generated. To be conservative, micropeptides encoded by linear RNAswere also examined and any overlapped circORFs were excluded in thefinal list (n=5 overlapped circORFs). The final list contains 958potential circORFs encoded by endogenous circRNAs (FIG. 6G, SEQ ID NO:32954-33911, Tables 7A and 7B).

By analyzing the circORF sequences and mapped IRES position on thecircRNAs, it was discovered that some circRNAs contain the IRES sequenceoverlapping the translated region of the ORF (n=457; ˜48%) (FIG. 16E).The IRES-overlapping ORF has been observed in some endogenouscircRNA-encoded proteins, which suggests some regulatory mechanisms mayexist between the initiation and the elongation of circRNA translation.Interestingly, among these circRNAs with IRES-overlapping ORFs, some ofthem contain in-frame ORFs without stop codons (n=82; ˜18%), formingrecursive ORFs which may be the mechanism of amplifying the expressionlevel of the circRNA-encoded proteins (FIG. 16F). It was furtherdemonstrated that the in-frame IRES can indeed produce recursive ORF onthe eGFP circRNA reporter (FIG. 16G).

Next, it was the general functions of these potential circORFs werecharacterized by searching for conserved motifs on the predictedpolypeptide sequences. Pfam analysis revealed that a substantial numberof circORFs contain conserved motifs. The top motifs are DNA bindingmotifs, translation elongation factors binding motifs, protein kinasedomains, and protein dimerization domains (FIG. 611 ), suggesting thatcircORFs may play roles in regulating various biological functionsincluding signal transduction, transcription, and translation. The sizeof most of these potential circORFs was small (<100 amino acids) (FIG.1611 ), which suggests that the majority of them may be the truncatedforms of the proteins generated from their parent linear transcripts.

To further validate the potential circORFs, the short open reading frame(sORFs) database was examined (Olexiouk et al., Nucleic acids research46, D497-D502 (2017)), which contains the polypeptide sequences (<100amino acids) from the identified sORFs aggregated by multiple ribosomeprofiling studies, to checked if the polypeptide sequences of thesesORFs can match the circORFs. The sORFs were first mapped to the currentproteome database (UniProt) and those sORFs that completely matched theORFs of the annotated linear transcripts were excluded. The remainingsORFs were then mapped to the potential circORFs. 317 predicted circORFswere identified, which can be matched by the sORFs (˜33%) (FIG. 16I),suggesting that the mapped IRES ORF analysis method can identifyendogenous circORF efficiently. On the other hand, traditional ORFanalysis on the same circRNAs, which takes all possible translationinitiation locations, gives a huge number of predicted polypeptides(n=426,439), where only a very small fraction of those polypeptides werecaptured by sORF studies (n=9,970; ˜2%) (FIG. 16I). Thus, knowledge ofthe circRNA IRES led to an ˜15-fold improvement in predicting circRNAderived sORFs. Together, the result suggests that in comparison totraditional ORF analysis, the mapped IRES ORF analysis is able toidentify endogenous circORFs more efficiently.

Subsequently, peptidomic analyses was performed on the tandem massspectrometry (MS/MS) datasets to validate the endogenous expression ofthe circORFs. Specifically, the predicted circORF list was appended tothe current proteome database (UniProt; linear proteome) and generated acombined proteome database (circORFs+linear proteome). The raw MS/MSdata was then taken from a wide range of cell lines, including K562,H358, U2OS, subcellular compartments SubCellBarCode (SCBC) database, and32 normal human tissues from the GTEx collection and performedpeptide-spectrum match (PSM) against the combined proteome database(FIG. 6I). To distinguish circORFs from the linear proteome, thecircORFs were excluded if the circORFs are matched by the trypticpolypeptides that can also match the linear proteome (FIG. 6I). 118circORFs harboring MS-matched unique tryptic polypeptides (FIG. 6J) werecaptured, in which 22 circORFs harboring MS-matched tryptic polypeptidesspanning across the circRNA back-splicing junction (BSJ) (FIG. 6K). Inaddition to the transformed cell lines, circORFs in the peptidomics ofnormal human tissues were captured (Jiang et al., 2020), suggesting thatthese circORFs are expressed in normal human cells. Moreover, parallelreaction monitoring-MS (PRM-MS) was performed to provide high resolutionvalidation of the circORF expression in K562 and U205. Specifically, theheavy isotope-labeled reference polypeptides of the unique region of thecircORFs identified from the K562 and U2OS MS/MS peptidomics weredesigned and synthesized, the labeled reference polypeptides were spikedin to the tryptic polypeptide samples, and precursor and transition ionsdetection was performed according to the labeled reference polypeptides(FIG. 6L, SEQ ID NO: 32954-33911, and Tables 7A and 7B). The PRM-MSfurther validates the existence of 6 out of 8 targeted circORFs (FIG.6L, SEQ ID NO: 32954-33911, and Tables 7A and 7B). The MS/MS and thePRM-MS peptidomics provide strong evidence demonstrating the circORFsare indeed expressed endogenously. As a complementary approach, theribosome footprinting (RFP) data was examined in human iPSCs (Chen etal., Science (2020) 367(6482):1140-1146), and it was found that 7 MS/MSdetected circORFs contain at least one RFP fragment overlapping uniquelywith the circRNA back-splicing junction (FIG. 16J). Together, theseresults suggest that it is possible to build a putative circORF listusing the circRNA IRES screening assay which can be validated by genomicand peptidomic analyses.

To further examine if the circORFs are involved in antigen presentation,the human leukocyte antigen I (HLA1)-associated peptidomics was analyzed(Bassani-Sternberg et al., 2015). Two HLA1-associated circORFs wereidentified (FIG. 6J). In silico HLA1 binding predictor NetMHC4.1analysis (Reynisson et al., 2020) suggests that these two circORFs areindeed strong HLA1 binder to the HLA1 variants expressed in the cellline used in HLA1 peptidomics (HLA-A03:01 for circORF_674 in fibroblast;HLA-007:02 for circORF_917 in JY) (Tables 7A and 7B). The resultindicates a new functional role of circORFs that some of the circORFsmay enter the HLA-I presentation pathway and contribute to the antigenrepertoire.

Notably, circORF detection by MS-based peptidomics is limited by (i)insufficient power to capture low abundance circORFs arising from lowcircRNA expression level in general, (ii) potential instability ofcircRNA-encoded polypeptides, (iii) the intrinsic difficulties to detectgenerally short circORFs, (iv) the number of cell lines/types ofpeptidomic datasets available, and (v) the narrow reference space ofcircORF unique polypeptides since all the regions that are shared bycircORF and the linear proteome were excluded. Given the limitations ofcircORF peptidomics, identification of circORFs was interpreted aspositive validation; the absence of detection in MS proteomic data doesnot rule out the translational potential for circRNA candidates. In linewith the limitations above, when the same limitations were applied toproteins encoded by known mRNAs, matching for expression level and thecell line examined, and down-sampled reference space, it was found thatcurrent peptidomic data can only recover ˜5% polypeptides of the proteinencoded by the mRNA with the same RPKM as the mean circRNA RPKM (FIGS.16K and 16L). Moreover, the expected discovery rate of circORFs isestimated to be ˜4% since, since only the circORF unique regions aresearched. The fact that it is possible to validate ˜12.3% (118 out of958) circORFs with peptidomics, which is much higher than the expecteddiscovery rate for circORFs, further highlights that the approachdisclosed herein can efficiently identify candidate endogenous circORFs,and supports the contention that circRNAs widely encode polypeptidessimilar to moderately expressed mRNAs.

Example 9

This example demonstrates that circFGFR1p suppresses cell proliferationunder stress conditions through a dominant-negative regulation.

To evaluate the potential functions of the expanded circRNA proteome, anexample of a potential protein-coding circRNA, hsa_circ_0084007, waschosen, and the function of its encoded protein was further examined.The circRNA is generated from the back-splicing of the exon 2 and theexon 7 of the human Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1)transcript; hence the names circFGFR1 and circFGFR1p were used to referto this circRNA and its encoded protein, respectively. Down-regulationof circFGFR1 has been observed in clinical cancer patient samples, whichmay suggest its role in regulating important biological processes.CircFGFR1 harbors an IRES showing strong eGFP expression in thescreening assay (top 2%), located in the 5′ UTR region of FGFR1 followedimmediately by an annotated AUG translation start codon (FIG. 7A). ORFanalysis using the immediate downstream AUG revealed that theback-splicing generates a de novo stop codon within the IRES ofcircFGFR1, resulting in an ORF that partially overlaps with the IRES(circORF_949) (FIG. 7A). To better characterize the phenotype and thefunction regulated by circFGFR1, a non-transformed human cell line, BJfibroblasts, was utilized for subsequent analysis. This cell line has adiploid genome for better phenotypic analysis and high FGFR1 expression.First, it was checked whether circFGFR1 expression can be detected in BJcell by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing usingthe divergent primers flanking the back-splicing junction of the exon 2and the exon 7 on circFGFR1 (FIG. 7B). The results demonstrated thatcircFGFR1 expression in BJ cells can successfully be detected.

Analysis of the predicted protein sequence indicated that circFGFR1pencodes a truncated form of FGFR1, which has an intact extracellularfibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) ligand-binding site, part of thedimerization domain (IgI, IgII, and partial N′ terminus of IgIII) butlacks the intracellular FGFR1 tyrosine kinase domain (FIG. 7C).CircFGFR1p also harbor a unique region due to circFGFR1 back-splicing,where the polypeptide sequence of this region does not present in thelinear proteome (UniProt) database (FIG. 7C). Western blotting using anantibody against the common region of circFGFR1p and FGFR1 (Ab-both)showed signals at the corresponding size of circFGFR1p (˜38 kDa) andFGFR1 (70-90 kDa) (FIG. 7K). ENCODE data demonstrated an absence ofchromatin signature of promoters (H3K4me3) near circFGFR1p IRES (FIG.17A), suggesting the protein was not generated from the truncated lineartranscript due to hidden promoters located in the exon 2 of FGFR1. Inline with the observation above, the circFGFR1 IRES identified (oligoindex: 8228) does not display promoter activity from the linear RNA IRESreporter screens (score=0) (Weingarten-Gabbay et al., 2016).

To validate endogenous circFGFR1p expression, a custom antibody againstthe unique region of circFGFR1p was generated. circFGFR1p was isolatedby immunoprecipitation (IP) using the custom antibody, and proteins(size selected ˜30-45 kDa on a polyacrylamide gel to separate circFGFR1pfrom FGFR1) were subjected to liquid chromatography with tandem massspectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (FIG. 7D). While no circFGFR1p polypeptides weredetected in the IgG control sample, it was possible to detect thetryptic polypeptides of the unique region of circFGFR1p as well as thetryptic polypeptides overlapped with the linear FGFR1 in the IP-LC-MS/MSsample (FIG. 7D). The result suggests that circFGFR1p is indeedexpressed and can be captured by the circFGFR1p antibody. To furtherconfirm circFGFR1p expression in high resolution, PRM-MS was performedusing a synthetic heavy isotope-labeled reference polypeptide of thecircFGFR1p unique region. It was possible to identify the correspondingprecursor and transition ions of the labeled reference polypeptide andthe sampling tryptic polypeptide from BJ cells, respectively (FIG. 7E).Collectively, the IP-MS and the PRM-MS provide the strong evidencedemonstrating endogenous circFGFR1p expression.

Upon binding to FGF, full-length FGFR1 dimerizes and autophosphorylatesthe kinase domain, which further triggers the downstream signalingpathway and facilitates cell proliferation. By co-expressing HA-taggedFGFR1 and FLAG-tagged circFGFR1p in HEK-293T cells and co-staining HA-and FLAG-tag to label FGFR1 and circFGFR1p respectively, it wasconfirmed that circFGFR1p is localized at the cell membrane in patchydomains and endosomes similarly to FGFR1 (FIG. 7F and FIG. 17B).CircFGFR1 contains the FGFR1 dimerization/ligand-binding domain butlacks the kinase domain, suggesting circFGFR1p may function as adominant-negative regulator of FGFR1 that suppresses cell proliferation.Moreover, lower circFGFR1 expression level was found in the tumorsamples of different subtypes of breast cancer in comparison to thenormal adjacent samples from studies analyzing the RNA-sequencing datafrom The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (FIG. 17C). In addition, circFGFR1expression was detected specifically in the non-transformed cell lines(n=5 unique non-transformed cell types out of 141 non-transformed cellline samples), but not in the cancer cell lines (n=87 cancer cell linesout of 87 cancer cell line samples) on the CSCD database (Xia et al.,2018) (FIG. 17D). These studies suggest that reduced circFGFR1expression level may be associated with cancer progression byupregulating cell proliferation. Thus, circFGFR1p appears to function asa negative regulator of FGFR1 through a dominant-negative mechanism thatsuppresses cell proliferation.

To test this hypothesis, circFGFR1 was first knocked down specificallywith siRNAs targeting the back-splicing junction of circFGFR1 (FIG. 7G).It was discovered that knockdown of circFGFR1 can indeed facilitate cellproliferation upon FGF addition (FIG. 711 ), suggesting that circFGFR1negatively regulates FGFR1 function of facilitating cell proliferation.To confirm that the cell proliferation phenotype that was observedresulted from the downregulation of circFGFR1p protein rather thancircFGFR1 RNA, the cell proliferation phenotype was further examinedupon downregulating circFGFR1p protein specifically by disrupting thecap-independent translation of circFGFR1p IRES. Since the translationinitiation is typically the rate limiting step of translation, theanti-sense LNA targeting the 18S rRNA complementary sequence on thecircFGFR1 IRES (LNA-185 of IRES-8228) was utilized, which was found toeffectively blocks circFGFR1p translation initiation (FIGS. 5B and 5D),to knock down circFGFR1p specifically without altering the level ofcircFGFR1 or FGFR1 RNA (FIG. 7G). LNA-mediated inhibition of circFGFR1IRES caused a lower expression level of circFGFR1p and a higher level ofphosphorylated FGFR1 (FIG. 7G), suggesting that knocking downcircFGFR1p, but not circFGFR1 RNA, can indeed lead to an increase inFGFR1 phosphorylation, leading to a higher level of active FGFR1(phosphorylated FGFR1). It is also in line with the observation thatknocking down circFGFR1p leads to a higher cell proliferation rate (FIG.711 ). Interestingly, the depletion of circFGFR1p also leads to a higherlevel of total FGFR1 protein (FIG. 7G). The result suggests thatcircFGFR1p functions not solely as a dominant-negative of FGFR1 signaltransduction, but circFGF1p also somehow inhibits full-length FGFR1accumulation, perhaps by increasing FGFR1 turnover or degradation. Asimilar FGFR1 degradation phenotype has also been observed whendominant-negative variants of FGFR1 are expressed in vivo. Conversely,it was checked if circFGFR1 overexpression in cells can suppress cellproliferation by encoding circFGFR1p with a FLAG epitope tag. Then, itwas cloned it into a linear mRNA expression plasmid driven by CMVpromoter to effectively overexpress circFGFR1p, and the circFGFR1pexpression plasmid was transfected into BJ cells (FIG. 7I). The resultsdemonstrated that circFGFR1p overexpression (circFGFR1pOE) can indeedsuppress cell proliferation (FIG. 7I). In addition, when FGFR1 andcircFGFR1p were co-overexpressed in cells (FGFR1OE+circFGFR1pOE), thephenotype of cell proliferation suspension was partially rescued (FIG.7I), which further suggests the antagonistic function of circFGFR1p forFGFR1. These results suggest that circRNA-encoded circFGFR1p cansuppress cell growth by interacting with FGFR1 through adominant-negative mechanism.

In comparison to FGFR1, the expression level of circFGFR1p is relativelylow (FIGS. 7J and 7K), which indicates that circFGFR1p may not be astrong regulator under normal conditions. Nevertheless, many IRESs havebeen reported to have steady cap-independent translation activity understress conditions, including the IRES of some endogenous protein-codingcircRNAs, such as circZNF-609. Thus, the cap-independent translationactivity of circFGFR1 IRES under stress conditions, such as underheat-shock, was further examined. First, cells were transfected witholigo-split-eGFP-circRNA reporter construct driven by circFGFR1 IRES andquantified the circFGFR1 IRES activity with or without the heat-shock.The results demonstrated that the cap-independent translation activityof 15 FGFR1 IRES remains steady during the heat-shock (FIG. 17E). Then,the FGFR1 and circFGFR1p protein levels were examined under theheat-shock condition. It was observed that FGFR1 protein level wasdownregulated after the heat-shock (FIGS. 7J and 7L), which is likelydue to the global reduction in cap-dependent translation caused by thechanges in the phosphorylation states of many eukaryotic initiationfactors and the sequestration of eIF4G by Hsc70 during the heat-shock.On the other hand, the circFGFR1p level, which is regulated bycap-independent translation, remained steady after the heat-shock (FIG.7J, 7L and FIGS. 17F and 17G). The result suggests that during heatshock although the global FGFR1 cap-dependent translation reduction isnot directly caused by the circFGFR1p level, the reduced FGFR1 level andstable circFGFR1p level enhances the circFGFR1p dominant negative effectand further lower the cell growth rate. Moreover, FGFR1 has been shownto form homomultimers when induced by cell adhesion molecules. Thenature of FGFR1 oligomerization may further enhance thedominant-negative effect of circFGFR1p because one circFGFR1p can joinand “poison” the signaling ability or lead to degradation of more FGFR1molecules. These phenomena may explain how lowly expressed circFGFR1pcan effectively regulate highly expressed FGFR1 and suppress cellproliferation under heat shock or other forms of cell stress conditions(FIGS. 17H and 17I).

Interestingly, while the circFGFR1 IRES (oligo index: 8228) displayedstrong cap-independent translation activity on the circRNA (top 2%), thesame IRES showed very weak cap-independent translation activity on thelinear RNA (bottom 10%) (Weingarten-Gabbay et al., 2016). Thisobservation suggests that the cap-independent translation activity ofcircFGFR1 IRES is preferentially activated on circFGFR1 rather than thelinear FGFR1 transcripts. This circRNA-biased IRES activity of circFGFR1IRES may also explain how under the heat-shock condition circFGFR1 IREScan selectively produce the steady amount of circFGFR1p withoutincreasing the level of FGFR1 protein isoforms produced from thecap-independent activity of circFGFR1 IRES on the linear FGFR1transcripts, allowing circFGFR1p to regulate FGFR1 functions moreeffectively. In sum, the findings presented above demonstrated that withthe disclosed methods, not a novel circRNA-encoded protein, circFGFR1p,was discovered that negatively regulates FGFR1 and suppresses cellproliferation through a dominant-negative mechanism under stressconditions. This study also reveals an important regulatory mechanism ofcircRNAs and their encoded proteins.

Various embodiments of this invention are described herein, includingthe best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention.Variations of these embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinaryskill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventorsexpect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, andthe inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than asspecifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes allmodifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in theclaims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, anycombination of the above-described elements in all possible variationsthereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicatedherein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All references, including publications, patent applications, andpatents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the sameextent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicatedto be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entiretyherein.

NUMBERED EMBODIMENTS

Notwithstanding the appended claims, the following numbered embodimentsalso form part of the instant disclosure.

1. A polynucleotide sequence encoding a circular RNA molecule; whereinthe circular RNA molecule comprises a protein-coding nucleic acidsequence region and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequenceregion operably linked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence,wherein the IRES sequence region comprises: at least one sequence regionhaving an RNA secondary structure element; and a sequence region that iscomplementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA); wherein the IRES sequenceregion has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9 kJ/mol and amelting temperature of at least 35.0° C.; and wherein the RNA secondarystructure element is formed from the nucleotides at about position 40 toabout position 60 of the IRES, wherein the first nucleic acid at the 5′end of the IRES is considered to be position 1.

2. The polynucleotide sequence of embodiment 1, wherein the proteincoding nucleic acid sequence region is operably linked to the IRESsequence region in a non-native configuration.

3. The polynucleotide sequence of embodiment 1 or 2, wherein thepolynucleotide sequence is a DNA sequence.

4. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-3, whereinthe sequence that is complementary to an 18S rRNA is any one SEQ ID NO:28977-28983.

5. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-4, whereinthe at least one RNA secondary structure element is located 5′ to thesequence region that is complementary to an 18S rRNA.

6. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-4, whereinthe at least one RNA secondary structure element is located 3′ to thesequence region that is complementary to an 18S rRNA.

7. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-6, whereinthe at least one RNA secondary structure element is a stem-loop.

8. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-7, whereinthe at least one RNA secondary structure element comprises any one ofthe nucleic acid sequences listed in Table 2.

9. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-8, whereinthe IRES sequence region is about 100 to about 1000 nucleotides inlength.

10. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-8, whereinthe IRES sequence region is about 200 to about 800 nucleotides inlength.

11. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-8, whereinthe IRES sequence is between 150-200 nucleotides, between 160-180nucleotides, or between 200-210 nucleotides in length.

12. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-11,comprising at least one non-coding functional sequence.

13. The polynucleotide sequence of embodiment 12, wherein the non-codingfunctional sequence comprises one or more (a) microRNA binding sites or(b) RNA binding protein binding sites.

14. The polynucleotide sequence of any one of embodiments 1-11, whereinthe DNA sequence comprises an aptamer.

15. A recombinant circular RNA molecule encoded by the polynucleotidesequence of any one of embodiments 1-14.

16. A DNA sequence encoding a circular RNA molecule; wherein thecircular RNA molecule comprises a protein-coding nucleic acid sequenceregion and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequence regionoperably linked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence; wherein theIRES sequence region comprises any one of the nucleic acid sequenceslisted in SEQ ID NO: 1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201, or a nucleic acidsequence having at least 90% or at least 95% identity or homologythereto.

17. The DNA sequence of embodiment 16, wherein the protein-codingnucleic acid sequence is operably linked to the IRES sequence region ina non-native configuration.

18. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-17, wherein the IRESsequence region has a G-C content of at least 25%.

19. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-18, wherein the IRESsequence region comprises any one of the nucleic acid sequences of SEQID NO: 1-228.

20. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-18, wherein the IRESsequence region comprises any one of the nucleic acid sequences of SEQID NO: 229-17201.

21. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-20, wherein the IRESsequence region comprises the nucleic acid sequence of any one of SEQ IDNOs: 531, 2270, 2602, 3042, 3244, and 33948.

22. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-21, wherein the IRESsequence region comprises a human IRES.

23. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-22, wherein theprotein coding-nucleic acid sequence region encodes a therapeuticpeptide or protein.

24. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-23, wherein thecircular RNA molecule comprises between about 200 nucleotides and about10,000 nucleotides.

25. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 13-24, wherein thecircular RNA molecule comprises a spacer between the IRES sequenceregion and a start codon of the protein-coding nucleic acid sequenceregion.

26. The DNA sequence of embodiment 25, wherein the length of the spaceris selected to increase translation of the protein-coding nucleic acidsequence region relative to translation of a circular RNA having eitherno spacer or a spacer that differs from the selected spacer.

27. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-26, wherein the IRESsequence region is configured to promote rolling circle translation.

28. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-26, wherein theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence region lacks a stop codon.

29. The DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-26, wherein (i) theIRES sequence region is configured to promote rolling circletranslation, and (ii) the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence regionlacks a stop codon.

30. A recombinant circular RNA molecule encoded by the DNA sequence ofany one of embodiments 16-29.

31. A viral vector comprising the polynucleotide of any one ofembodiments 1-14 or the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29.

32. The viral vector of embodiment 31, which is selected from the groupconsisting of an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector, an adenovirusvector, a retrovirus vector, a lentivirus vector, a vaccinia and aherpesvirus vector.

33. The viral vector of embodiment 31 or 32, wherein the viral vector isan AAV.

34. The viral vector of embodiment 33, wherein the AAV serotype isselected from the group consisting of AAV1, AAV2, AAV3, AAV4, AAV5,AAV6, AAV8, AAV9, AAVrh10 or any variant thereof having substantiallythe same tropism.

35. A viral-like particle comprising the polynucleotide of any one ofembodiments 1-14 or the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29.

36. A nonviral-like particle comprising the polynucleotide of any one ofembodiments 1-14 or the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29.

37. A closed-ended DNA sequence comprising the polynucleotide of any oneof embodiments 1-14 or the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29.

38. A plasmid comprising the polynucleotide of any one of embodiments1-14 or the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29.

39. A mini-intronic plasmid vector comprising the polynucleotide of anyone of embodiments 1-14 or the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments16-29.

40. A composition comprising the polynucleotide of any one ofembodiments 1-14, the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29, or arecombinant circular RNA molecule of embodiment 15 or 30.

41. The composition of embodiment 40, wherein the lipid nanoparticle isdecorated.

42. A host cell comprising the polynucleotide of any one of embodiments1-14, the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29, or a recombinantcircular RNA molecule of embodiment 15 or 30.

43. A method of producing a protein in a cell, the method comprisingcontacting a cell with (a) the polynucleotide of any one of embodiments1-14, (b) the DNA sequence of any one of embodiments 16-29, (c) thecircular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments 15 or 30, (d) the viralvector of any one of embodiments 31-34, (e) the viral like particle ofembodiment 35, (f) the nonviral-like particle of embodiment 36, (g) theclosed-end DNA sequence of embodiment 37, (h) the plasmid of embodiment38, (i) the mini-intronic plasmid vector of embodiment 39, or (j) thecomposition of any one of embodiments 40-41 under conditions whereby theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence of the circular RNA is translatedand the protein is produced in the cell.

44. The method of embodiment 43, wherein 5′ cap-dependent translation inthe cell is impaired or nonexistent.

45. The method of embodiment 43 or 44, wherein the cell is in vivo.

46. The method of embodiment 45, wherein the cell is a mammalian cell.

47. The method of embodiment 46, wherein the mammalian cell is derivedfrom a human.

48. The method of any one of embodiments 45-46, wherein production ofthe protein is tissue-specific.

49. The method of embodiment 48, wherein the tissue specificity islocalized to a tissues selected from the group consisting of muscle,liver, kidney, brain, lung, skin, pancreas, blood, and heart.

50. The method of embodiment 43 or 44, wherein the cell is in vitro.

51. The method of any one of embodiments 43-48, wherein the protein isexpressed recursively in the cell.

52. The method of any one of embodiments 43-51, wherein the half-life ofthe circular RNA in the cell is about 1 to about 7 days.

53. The method of any one of embodiments 43-55, wherein the protein isproduced in the cell for at least about 10%, at least about 20%, or atleast about 30% longer than if the protein-coding nucleic acid sequenceis provided to the cell in a linear format RNA or encoded fortranscription as a linear RNA.

54. A protein produced by the method of any one of embodiments 43-53.

55. A recombinant circular RNA molecule comprising a protein-codingnucleic acid sequence and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES)operably linked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence, wherein theIRES comprises: at least one RNA secondary structure; and a sequencethat is complementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA); wherein the IREShas a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9 kJ/mol and a meltingtemperature of at least 35.0° C.

56. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of embodiment 55, wherein theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence is operably linked to the IRES in anon-native configuration.

57. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of embodiment 55 or 56,wherein the sequence that is complementary to an 18S rRNA is encoded byany one of SEQ ID NO: 28977-28983.

58. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-57, wherein the at least one RNA secondary structure is located 5′ tothe sequence that is complementary to an 18S rRNA.

59. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-57, wherein the at least one RNA secondary structure is located 3′ tothe sequence that is complementary to an 18S rRNA.

60. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-59, wherein the at least one RNA secondary structure is a stem-loop.

61. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-59, wherein the at least one RNA secondary structure comprises asequence encoded by any one of the DNA sequences listed in Table 2.

62. The recombinant circular RNA of any one of embodiments 55-61,wherein the IRES is about 100 to about 1000 nucleotides in length.

63. The recombinant circular RNA of any one of embodiments 55-61,wherein the IRES is about 200 to about 200 nucleotides in length.

64. The recombinant circular RNA of any one of embodiments 55-61,wherein the IRES sequence is between 150-200 nucleotides, between160-180 nucleotides, or between 200-210 nucleotides in length.

65. The recombinant circular RNA of any one of embodiments 62-64,wherein the RNA secondary structure is formed from the nucleotides atabout position 40 to about position 60 of the IRES, relative to the 5′end thereof.

66. The recombinant circular RNA of any one of embodiments 55-65,comprising at least one non-coding functional sequence.

67. The recombinant circular RNA of embodiment 66, wherein thenon-coding functional sequence comprises one or more (a) microRNAbinding sites or (b) RNA binding protein binding sites.

68. The recombinant circular RNA of any one of embodiments 55-65,wherein the circular RNA comprises an aptamer.

69. A recombinant circular RNA molecule comprising a protein-codingnucleic acid sequence and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES)operably linked to the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence; wherein theIRES is encoded by any one of the DNA sequences listed in SEQ ID NO:1-228 or SEQ ID NO: 229-17201, or a DNA sequence having at least 90% orat least 95% identity or homology thereto.

70. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of embodiment 69, wherein theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence is operably linked to the IRES in anon-native configuration.

71. The recombinant circular RNA of any one of embodiments 55-70,wherein the recombinant circular RNA comprises a back-splice junction,and wherein the IRES is located within about 100 to about 200nucleotides of the back-splice junction.

72. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-71, wherein the IRES has a G-C content of at least 25%.

73. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-72, wherein the IRES is encoded by any of the DNA sequences of SEQ IDNO: 1-228.

74. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-72, wherein the IRES is encoded by any one of the DNA sequences ofSEQ ID NO: 229-17201.

75. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of embodiment 74, wherein theIRES is encoded by any one of the DNA sequences shown in SEQ ID NO: 531,2270, 2602, 3042, 3244, 33948.

76. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-75, wherein the IRES is a human IRES.

77. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-76, wherein the protein coding-nucleic acid sequence encodes atherapeutic peptide or protein.

78. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-77, wherein the circular RNA comprises between about 200 nucleotidesand about 10,000 nucleotides.

79. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-78, wherein the circular RNA molecule comprises a spacer between theIRES sequence region and a start codon of the protein-coding nucleicacid sequence region.

80. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of embodiment 79, wherein thelength of the spacer is selected to increase translation of theprotein-coding nucleic acid sequence region relative to translation of acircular RNA having either no spacer or a spacer that differs from theselected spacer.

81. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-78, wherein the IRES sequence region is configured to promote rollingcircle translation.

82. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-78, wherein the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region lacks astop codon.

83. The recombinant circular RNA molecule of any one of embodiments55-78, wherein (i) the IRES sequence region is configured to promoterolling circle translation, and (ii) the protein-coding nucleic acidsequence region lacks a stop codon.

84. A composition comprising the recombinant circular RNA molecule ofany one of embodiments 55-83.

85. A host cell comprising the recombinant circular RNA molecule of anyone of embodiments 55-83 or the composition of embodiment 84.

86. A method of producing a protein in a cell, the method comprisingcontacting a cell with the recombinant circular RNA molecule of any oneof embodiments 55-83, or the composition of embodiment 84 underconditions whereby the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence istranslated and the protein is produced in the cell.

87. The method of embodiment 86, wherein 5′ cap-dependent translation inthe cell is impaired or nonexistent.

88. The method of embodiment 86 or 87, wherein the cell is in vivo.

89. The method of embodiment 86 or 87, wherein the cell is a mammaliancell.

90. The method of embodiment 89, wherein the mammalian cell is derivedfrom a human.

91. The method of any one of embodiments 55-90, wherein production ofthe protein is tissue-specific.

92. The method of embodiment 91, wherein the tissue specificity islocalized to a tissues selected from the group consisting of muscle,liver, kidney, brain, lung, skin, pancreas, blood, and heart.

93 The method of embodiment 86 or 87, wherein the cell is in vitro.

94. The method of any one of embodiments 86-93, wherein the protein isexpressed recursively in the cell.

95. The method of any one of embodiments 86-94, wherein the half-life ofthe circular RNA in the cell is about 1 to about 7 days.

96. The method of any one of embodiments 86-94, wherein the protein isproduced in the cell for at least about 10%, at least about 20%, or atleast about 30% longer than if the protein-coding nucleic acid sequenceis provided to the cell in a linear format RNA or encoded fortranscription as a linear RNA.

97. A protein produced by the method of any one of embodiments 86-96.

98. An oligonucleotide molecule comprising a nucleic acid sequence thathybridizes to an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) present on acircular RNA molecule and inhibits translation of the circular RNAmolecule.

99. The oligonucleotide molecule of embodiment 98, wherein the circularRNA is a recombinant circular RNA.

100. The oligonucleotide molecule of embodiment 98, wherein therecombinant circular RNA is the recombinant circular RNA of any one ofembodiments 55-83.

101. The oligonucleotide molecule of embodiment 98, wherein the circularRNA is a naturally occurring circular RNA.

102. The oligonucleotide molecule of any one of embodiments 98-101,wherein the oligonucleotide is an antisense oligonucleotide.

103. The oligonucleotide of embodiment 102, wherein the antisenseoligonucleotide is a locked nucleic acid oligonucleotide (LNA).

104. The oligonucleotide of any one of embodiments 98-103, wherein theoligonucleotides is chemically modified at its 5′ and/or its 3′ end.

105. A method of inhibiting translation of a protein-coding nucleic acidsequence present on a circular RNA molecule, which method comprisescontacting the circular RNA molecule with an oligonucleotide molecule ofany one of embodiments 98-104, whereby the oligonucleotide moleculehybridizes to the RNA secondary structure and/or the nucleic acidsequence complementary to 18S rRNA present on the IRES of the circularRNA molecule and inhibits translation of the circular RNA molecule.

106. The method of embodiment 105, wherein the oligonucleotidehybridizes to the RNA secondary structure or the nucleic acid sequencethat is complementary to 18S rRNA.

107. The method of embodiment 105, wherein the oligonucleotidehybridizes to the RNA secondary structure and the nucleic acid sequencethat is complementary to 18S rRNA.

108. The method of embodiment 105, wherein a first oligonucleotidehybridizes to the RNA secondary structure and a second oligonucleotidehybridizes to the nucleic acid sequence that is complementary to 18SrRNA.

1.-16. (canceled)
 17. A polynucleotide comprising a protein-codingnucleic acid sequence and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES)sequence region operably linked to the protein-coding nucleic acidsequence, wherein the IRES sequence region comprises, (i) at least oneRNA secondary structure element, and (ii) a sequence that iscomplementary to an 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), wherein the IRES sequenceregion has a minimum free energy (MFE) of less than −18.9 kJ/mol and amelting temperature of at least 35.0° C., and wherein the at least oneRNA secondary structure element is formed by the nucleotidescorresponding to about positions 40-60 of the IRES in which the firstnucleotide at the 5′ end of the IRES sequence is considered to beposition
 1. 18. The polynucleotide of clam 1, wherein the at least oneRNA secondary structure element is a stem-loop.
 19. The polynucleotideof clam 1, wherein the sequence that is complementary an 18S rRNAcomprises a sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 28977-28983.
 20. Thepolynucleotide of clam 1, wherein the at least one RNA secondarystructure element is located 5′ to the sequence that is complementary toan 18S rRNA, or 3′ to the sequence that is complementary to an 18S rRNA.21. The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polynucleotide is a DNAsequence, or a linear RNA sequence.
 22. The polynucleotide of claim 5,wherein the polynucleotide is a DNA sequence.
 23. The polynucleotide ofclaim 6, wherein the DNA sequence is comprised in a viral vector, aviral like particle, or a non-viral vector.
 24. The polynucleotide ofclaim 7, wherein the DNA sequence is comprised in a viral vector, andwherein the viral vector is an adeno-associated virus (AAV), anadenovirus vector (AV), a retrovirus vector, a lentivirus vector, avaccinia, or a herpesvirus vector.
 25. The polynucleotide of claim 1,wherein the IRES is about 200 to about 1,000 nucleotides in length. 26.The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the polynucleotide comprises twoself-splicing intron fragments flanking the protein-coding nucleic acidand IRES sequence region, and wherein self-splicing the intron fragmentsmakes a circular RNA.
 27. A polynucleotide comprising a protein-codingnucleic acid sequence and an internal ribosome entry site (IRES)sequence region operably linked to the protein-coding nucleic acidsequence, wherein the IRES sequence region comprises a nucleic acidsequence at least 90%, at least 95%, or 100% identical to any one of thesequences in the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs. 1-228, and SEQ ID NOs.229-17201.
 28. The polynucleotide of claim 11, wherein the IRES sequenceregion is operably linked to the IRES sequence region in a non-nativeconfiguration.
 29. The polynucleotide of claim 11, wherein the IRESsequence region comprises any one of the nucleic acid sequences of SEQID NOs. 531, 2270, 2602, 3042, 3244 and
 33948. 30. The polynucleotide ofclaim 11, wherein the IRES sequence region has a G-C content of at least25%.
 31. The polynucleotide of claim 11, wherein the polynucleotidecomprises a spacer between the IRES sequence region and a start codon ofthe protein coding nucleic acid sequence region.
 32. The polynucleotideof claim 15, wherein the length of the spacer is selected to increasetranslation of the protein-coding nucleic acid sequence region relativeto translation of a circular RNA having no spacer or a spacer thatdiffers from the selected spacer.
 33. The polynucleotide of claim 11,wherein the IRES sequence region is configured to promote rolling circletranslation.
 34. The polynucleotide of claim 11, wherein thepolynucleotide is a DNA sequence, or a linear RNA sequence.
 35. Thepolynucleotide of claim 18, wherein the polynucleotide is a DNAsequence, and wherein the DNA sequence is comprised in a viral vector, aviral like particle, or a non-viral vector.
 36. The polynucleotide ofclaim 11, wherein the polynucleotide comprises two self-splicing intronfragments flanking the protein-coding nucleic acid and IRES sequenceregion, and wherein self-splicing the intron fragments makes a circularRNA.
 37. A method for producing a protein in a cell comprisingintroducing into the cell the polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein thepolynucleotide produces a circular RNA and wherein the protein codingnucleic acid sequence of the circular RNA is translated to produce theencoded protein in the cell.